check if user received messages

Dear Colleagues, is it possible to check in the Postfix logs if user delete/receive message ? Or to check if message was dropped by the server ? Thanks in advance Zalezny

Re: Rate limiting guidance needed

> If it's possible to throttle based on MX record for a domain, I'd really > appreciate your help. I do it with the iptables packet filter (I'm on Linux, but I suspect there are similar packages on other systems). I shuttle incoming packets of the different protocols to individual chains, the

General SPAM Strategy

Hi, I need a better spam setup. Right now I'm using spamd to mark spam and then procmail to put spam in Maildir/.Spam and then run bayes on Maildir/.LearnAsSpam once in a while manually and then I have to delete stuff once in a while manually and so on and so on ad nausium. Can someone give me a

Re: Rate limiting guidance needed

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alex Regan wrote: > If it's possible to throttle based on MX record for a domain, I'd really > appreciate your help. > Hi, Alex. I don't do it that way, but that sounds simpler than the way I do it! Interested to see what others come up with. > If you have a lis

Re: Policy server sender verification

Daniel Miller: > Is there a way for a policy server to validate senders using > Postfix's built-in authentication (like meeting permit_mynetworks > and permit_sasl_authenticated)? ?Or must the necessary checks be > duplicated? Let Postfix do the permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated etc. va

concerning how to configure mail for relay

i'm apparently unable to understand how to correctly configure mail for relay in my particular use case. i need a secondary daemon which clears my content_filter and always uses a particular relayhost. here is where my master.cf currently stands: scan unix - - n - 1

Policy server sender verification

Is there a way for a policy server to validate senders using Postfix's built-in authentication (like meeting permit_mynetworks and permit_sasl_authenticated)?   Or must the necessary checks be duplicated? -- Daniel

Re: IMF envelope behaviour

Ciaran Scolard: > For some reason postfix gives the IMF header priority over the actual RCPT > TO: as the destination. Please share actual concrete evidence for that claim. Wietse

IMF envelope behaviour

Hi All, I have an issue where a mail is sent to a distribution group on a mail server (Exchange 2010) and is then forwarded to my postfix server. I ran a wireshark trace and I can see that the mail comes in with the destination set to the expanded members of the distribution group (as expected,

Re: encrypt incoming emails with my public gpg key

* on the Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 01:21:44PM +0200, Michael Ströder wrote: >> I would suggest using Ciphermail / Djigzo for this. >> But I think you are solving your problem in a very incorrect way. Since the >> hosting company do have access to the VM, they could easy listen on the >> memory >> befo

Re: encrypt incoming emails with my public gpg key

Sebastian Nielsen wrote: > I would suggest using Ciphermail / Djigzo for this. > But I think you are solving your problem in a very incorrect way. Since the > hosting company do have access to the VM, they could easy listen on the memory > before the mail is encrypted, just after it has been decryp