On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:10:55AM +0530, dE wrote:
> On 05/05/15 21:30, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:17:06PM +0530, dE wrote:
> >
> >>if multiple daemons listen on the single port, how is the concurrency
> >>problem handled?
> >TL;DR: Correctly.
> >
> >In detail: Multiple
On 05/05/15 21:30, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:17:06PM +0530, dE wrote:
if multiple daemons listen on the single port, how is the concurrency
problem handled?
TL;DR: Correctly.
In detail: Multiple processes indeed share the acceptor socket,
but only one (otherwise) idle
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:22:42PM +0200, Robert Senger wrote:
> I am having trouble sending mail to a specific smtp host, which is
> configured for sasl authentication on port 25.
This should have no impact on your machine, unless you also configure
smtp_sasl_password_maps non-empty, and configu
Hi Wietse,
thanks, I am using Postfix 2.11, and I assume the parameter is
smtp_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps, right?
I tried that, and it worked for the specific peer, thanks again.
But I wonder why I never received any bounced error message. I've seen
Postfix retrying several times in the l
You can suppress the remote SMTP server's AUTH announcement with
smtp_discard_ehlo_keyword_maps.
Wietse
Hi,
I am having trouble sending mail to a specific smtp host, which is
configured for sasl authentication on port 25.
I have configured Postfix to send smtp mail from a small number of local
domains to the recipient domain's mail exchanger, and to send mail from
non local domains such as gmx.de a
On 27/04/15 6:53 am, Bill Cole wrote:
On 26 Apr 2015, at 17:21, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 1:11 PM, E.B. wrote:
HasStan stopped hosting/maintaining it?
Yes. :(
Like I said, it appears Stan has disappeared.
His last archived post was to the XFS list in January.
I c
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:17:06PM +0530, dE wrote:
> if multiple daemons listen on the single port, how is the concurrency
> problem handled?
TL;DR: Correctly.
In detail: Multiple processes indeed share the acceptor socket,
but only one (otherwise) idle process at a time is monitoring it
for
On 05/05/15 12:24, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 12:12:10PM +0530, dE wrote:
"The maximum number of processes that may execute this service
simultaneously."
The maximum number of daemon processes master(8) will fork/exec to
process incoming requests for the service.
But a
Oops, I missed that Alex had already posted this suggestion. Sorry!
> Am 30.04.2015 um 13:43 schrieb gilbertoferreira:
> > Thanks for your answer, but I need this only for a few accounts...
> > I thing use procmail or .forward rules...
>
> Have a look at recipient_bcc_maps:
> http://www.postfix.o
On 01/05/2015 17:45, Benning, Markus wrote:
Hi,
if you are willed to test my pflogsumm fork and to provide some sample
loglines
i'll implement postscreen statistics.
You can find the project at Github:
https://github.com/benningm/saftpresse
I modularized the pflogsumm code into seperate plu
11 matches
Mail list logo
