* Wietse Venema :
> Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > Perhaps the list of recommendations could be expanded to recommend sending
> > "postconf -M" output along with "postconf -n". I'd expect this to complement
> > the overall picture.
>
> It is as if it was added yesterday, but in reality it was introduced
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> Perhaps the list of recommendations could be expanded to recommend sending
> "postconf -M" output along with "postconf -n". I'd expect this to complement
> the overall picture.
It is as if it was added yesterday, but in reality it was introduced
with Postfix 2.9, three year
Perhaps the list of recommendations could be expanded to recommend sending
"postconf -M" output along with "postconf -n". I'd expect this to complement
the overall picture.
p@rick
--
[*] sys4 AG
https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft:
Thanks for sharing this i think i have to read more about it.
once again Thanks alot for your support.
MYK
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Mathias Jeschke
wrote:
> Hi Yousuf,
>
> On 2015-04-04 at 22:58 Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
> BTW does it unsure my server if i comment out this like "-o
Hi Yousuf,
On 2015-04-04 at 22:58 Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
BTW does it unsure my server if i comment out this like "-o
smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt'
It depends on your policy/topology/...
Based on your setting in main.cf there is at least STARTTLS offered on
port 25 (smtpd_tls_securi
BTW does it unsure my server if i comment out this like " -o
smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt'
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan
wrote:
> Thanks Mathias Jeschke and Petrick.
>
> Issue is resolved as i commented out the said line.
>
> Thanks,
> yousuf
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at
Thanks Mathias Jeschke and Petrick.
Issue is resolved as i commented out the said line.
Thanks,
yousuf
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Mathias Jeschke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-04-0 at 22:17 Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
> smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
>> #smtp
> That's how we all start. Don't worry about that.
Thanks :)
On which port does your client connect? Once we have that, we can check the
> config on Postfix's end.
>
>
my client is set for port 25 and authentication mode is AUTO client is
outlook. btw issue is not at client side i believe that
Hi,
On 2015-04-0 at 22:17 Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
#smtp inet n - - - 1 postscreen
#smtpd pass - - - - - smtpd
#dnsblog unix - - - -
Mathias,
here is my master.cf
# Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the format
# of the file, see the master(5) manual page (command: "man 5 master").
#
# Do not forget to execute "postfix reload" after editing this file.
#
# ===
* Muhammad Yousuf Khan :
> On which port are you trying to submit the message? Port 587? You likely are
>
> > enforcing TLS on that port.
> >
> > my submitting port is set to 465. there are only 2 ports listening under
> Postfix process. 25 and 465
>
> > In any case either change the smtpd_tls_po
Hi,
On 2015-04-04 at 21:52 Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
my submitting port is set to 465. there are only 2 ports listening under
Postfix process. 25 and 465
In any case either change the smtpd_tls_policy_level to 'may' or
configure the
client failing to use STARTTLS.
my smtpd_tls
On which port are you trying to submit the message? Port 587? You likely are
> enforcing TLS on that port.
>
> my submitting port is set to 465. there are only 2 ports listening under
Postfix process. 25 and 465
> In any case either change the smtpd_tls_policy_level to 'may' or configure
> the
>
Hello,
I'm experiencing an issue with duplicate suppression and recipient
address verification.
Basically I'm looking for a solution to suppress mail duplicates when a
mail is sent to more than one recipient (typically virtual aliases) and
those recipients/aliases are not disjoint, e.g. consider
* Muhammad Yousuf Khan :
> i am newbie to postfix i have just installed ispconfig and mails are
> working as expected.I am using a domain lets say xyz.com, email btw (local
> domain memebers) a...@xyz.com and 1...@xyz.com are working fine. even email i
> am able to receive email from gmail.com
> h
i am newbie to postfix i have just installed ispconfig and mails are
working as expected.I am using a domain lets say xyz.com, email btw (local
domain memebers) a...@xyz.com and 1...@xyz.com are working fine. even email i
am able to receive email from gmail.com
however one of my official email hos
Hi,
Following previous conversations here I have user/pass
authentication working on 587. I am hoping to take this one stage
further by using certificate authentication, perhaps without
user/pass authentication, but I am failing. The client I am using is
K-9 mail
is subject currect ?
https://knowledge.rapidssl.com/support/ssl-certificate-support/index?page=content&actp=CROSSLINK&id=SO26459
should the signed cert be added to the intermidiate file in postfix ?
to get it more clear, should all signed certs be in the intermidiate
file, or can signed files
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 08:36:58AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Strictly speaking, recipient_bcc_maps is redundant
> because the same can be done (more clumsily) with virtual_alias_maps.
If I recall correctly, the handling of DSN and bounces is different
for MTA added BCC recipients. Failure to
@lbutlr:
> I was wondering if it would be possible to use a map for always_bcc that
> would bcc emails for some users and not others, and to bcc to a custom
> address for each user.
>
> right now, I have always_bcc set to back...@covisp.net but I would like to
> set it up to something like:
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
