Now that the FREAK attack is widely disclosed, those of you who
run SMTP servers that peer with clients that authenticate your
server (be it via the traditional PKI or via DANE), might want to
tighten-up your server cipher-suite settings just in-case:
smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers = EXPORT, LOW
On Mar 3, 2015, at 8:55 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/3/2015 9:47 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>> On Mar 3, 2015, at 08:30, Noel Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> To manually test a message, use something like:
>>> postcat -bhq QUEUEID | spamassassin
>>
>> I was surprised that postcat requires a full path to the file,
Charles Orth:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been looking at postfix 2.11.1 code base.
> It appears SMFIR_ADDRCPT_PAR is for the milter to add new recipient with
> parameters to the current message.
When the Milter application receives the END-OF-MESSAGE event, it
invokes the libmilter smfi_addrcpt_par()
Hi All,
I have been looking at postfix 2.11.1 code base.
It appears SMFIR_ADDRCPT_PAR is for the milter to add new recipient with
parameters to the current message.
I need my milter to receive the RCPT TO parameters. Does postfix provide
support for passing these arguments to the milter?
Char
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:56:29PM -0600, helices wrote:
> For each incoming message received, every outgoing "reply" must use the
> "To:" address from the incoming received message as the "From:" address in
> the outgoing reply.
I see you're also asking the same question on the exim-users list.
I am not sure what has gotten through on the mailing list
1) I was unable to patch the Net::DNS version .76 I am running version .78
2( The mail system is happily using about 4 RBLs
Ater updating all involved ports I am still getting
75371-06) _WARN: rules: failed to run NO_DNS_FOR_
On 3/3/2015 9:47 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 08:30, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>> To manually test a message, use something like:
>> postcat -bhq QUEUEID | spamassassin
>
> I was surprised that postcat requires a full path to the file, but thanks for
> the info in the "From " header.
>
I
On Mar 3, 2015, at 08:30, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> To manually test a message, use something like:
> postcat -bhq QUEUEID | spamassassin
I was surprised that postcat requires a full path to the file, but thanks for
the info in the "From " header.
On 3/3/2015 3:58 AM, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> On 03/03/15 10:00, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the possible alternatives.
>>
>> In this case I chose to go with the REDIRECT because we have an
>> option
>> to also do REJECT. (User can chose to redirect or reject through a
>> webinterface). It
On 3/3/2015 9:14 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> When I have a message in the mailq how do I get just the message out to, for
> example, feeding to SpamAssassin? With postcat -bh there is no "From " header.
>
> (I'm not sure if SA uses the "From " header or not)
>
>
The "From " pseudo-header is added dur
When I have a message in the mailq how do I get just the message out to, for
example, feeding to SpamAssassin? With postcat -bh there is no "From " header.
(I'm not sure if SA uses the "From " header or not)
--
Rudy Gevaert:
> I didn't see in the manual that REJECT is limited to one recipient. But
> I should still test it.
It does say that "redirect address" overrides all recipients, but
it does not explicitly describe the result of multiple "redirect"
actions (each "redirect" action overrides previous
Rudy Gevaert:
> I know, I'm asking what is the big difference between REJECT in an
> access map and the relocated maps. The behaviour is the same (as I
> currently can see). What is then different.
SMTP server only: "REJECT The user has moved".
All mail: relocated_maps with "u...@example.com
On 03/03/15 11:09, Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:58:20 +0100
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Could someone tell me if there any other differences
between using
u...@domain.com REJECT The user has moved
and a relocated map with:
u...@domain.com The user has moved
There is no "REJECT" in r
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:58:20 +0100
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Could someone tell me if there any other differences
> between using
> u...@domain.com REJECT The user has moved
>
> and a relocated map with:
> u...@domain.com The user has moved
>
There is no "REJECT" in relocated map...
http://www.post
On 03/03/15 10:00, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Thanks for the possible alternatives.
In this case I chose to go with the REDIRECT because we have an option
to also do REJECT. (User can chose to redirect or reject through a
webinterface). It was nice to do it in one lookup.
I didn't see in the manual
On 03/02/15 17:37, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:26:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
If you want to *replace* those recipients, you could use
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
recipient_canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_canonical
recipient_canonical_classes = envel
I have Postfix/Dovecot with virtual domains, same setup unaltered since
quite a while ago
last month, added a new virtual domain, 'just like before'.
but, today noticed this in the queue/log 'overdrawn his diskspace quota'[1]:
user's Maildir cur has like 48,762,696 bytes (lot less than other u
18 matches
Mail list logo
