André Peters:
I run a smtpd_milter to sign mail via OpenDKIM. This happens
before-queue, right?
in your setup, right.
Next this signed mail goes through a Spamassassin content-filter, which
adds some X-Headers after-queue.
How can this mail still have a valid DKIM signature?
OpenDKIM don'
Hello,
I am a bit curious about this:
I run a smtpd_milter to sign mail via OpenDKIM. This happens
before-queue, right?
Next this signed mail goes through a Spamassassin content-filter, which
adds some X-Headers after-queue.
How can this mail still have a valid DKIM signature? Don't get me wro
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:56:29PM -0600, helices wrote:
> I am tasked to design, build and maintain a new MTA. The company has one
> special requirement, for which I'm investigating the simplest solution:
>
> For each incoming message received, every outgoing "reply" must use the
> "To:" addres
I am tasked to design, build and maintain a new MTA. The company has
one special requirement, for which I'm investigating the simplest solution:
For each incoming message received, every outgoing "reply" must use the
"To:" address from the incoming received message as the "From:" address
in t
Viktor
Thank you for your response which clarifies all my concerns.
Paul
On 02/03/2015 22:05, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:40:17PM +, Paul wrote:
I have a Ubuntu Postfix (2.11) setup which only delivers locally submitted
mail. I have enabled outgoing TLS support
Sebastian Nielsen:
> What exactly is wrong with my MIME?
>
> Wietse and A Schulze says my MIME mail is not properly formatted, but in
> which way?
>
> I did this now (look in mimeparser.pl), this milter is placed before
> signing-milter.
> What it does, is take the whole mail and put into a loo
What exactly is wrong with my MIME?
Wietse and A Schulze says my MIME mail is not properly formatted, but in which
way?
I did this now (look in mimeparser.pl), this milter is placed before
signing-milter.
What it does, is take the whole mail and put into a loose MIME Parser, and then
reencodes
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:40:17PM +, Paul wrote:
> I have a Ubuntu Postfix (2.11) setup which only delivers locally submitted
> mail. I have enabled outgoing TLS support
It seems to be working just fine.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/249429
http://permalink.gma
On 02/03/2015 21:19, Wietse Venema wrote:
Paul:
root@rowan:/etc/postfix# posttls-finger -F
You should never run this test as root, if only because the Postfix
SMTP client does not run as root.
If that does not explain the difference, try turning off chroot
in master.cf:
# service type priv
Paul:
> root@rowan:/etc/postfix# posttls-finger -F
You should never run this test as root, if only because the Postfix
SMTP client does not run as root.
If that does not explain the difference, try turning off chroot
in master.cf:
# service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command
Hi list
I have a Ubuntu Postfix (2.11) setup which only delivers locally
submitted mail.
I have enabled outgoing TLS support
root@rowan:/etc/postfix# postconf -n | grep tls
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
smtp_tls_loglevel = 1
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes
smtp_tls_se
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:26:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > If you want to *replace* those recipients, you could use
> > >
> > > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > > recipient_canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_canonical
> > > recipient_canonical_classes = envelope_recipient
>
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:42:27AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > Is there a way that I can still use the REDIRECT statement to achieve
> > > the same result but without braking delivery?
> >
> > If you want to *replace* those recipients, you could use
> >
> > /etc/post
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:42:27AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Is there a way that I can still use the REDIRECT statement to achieve
> > the same result but without braking delivery?
>
> If you want to *replace* those recipients, you could use
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> recipient_cano
Rudy Gevaert:
> Hallo,
>
> I configured smtpd_recipient_restrictions to look in an access table. I
> was intending to use the REDIRECT statement to redirect mails for
> certain recipients.
>
> unfortunately, after a selected roll out into production we noticed that
> this has issues for messa
On 3/2/2015 7:59 AM, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I configured smtpd_recipient_restrictions to look in an access
> table. I was intending to use the REDIRECT statement to redirect
> mails for certain recipients.
>
> unfortunately, after a selected roll out into production we noticed
> that t
Hallo,
I configured smtpd_recipient_restrictions to look in an access table. I
was intending to use the REDIRECT statement to redirect mails for
certain recipients.
unfortunately, after a selected roll out into production we noticed that
this has issues for messages sent to multiple recipie
17 matches
Mail list logo
