Re: postfix

2015-02-11 Thread Luigi Rosa
Mohammed Ejaz wrote on 12/02/2015 08:50: Just I wanted to know does postfix mail server has an option to keep the message copy after successfully got delivered, you can start with always_bcc http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#always_bcc -- Ciao, luigi / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Biggest

postfix

2015-02-11 Thread Mohammed Ejaz
hello. Just I wanted to know does postfix mail server has an option to keep the message copy after successfully got delivered, We are using postfix mail application to scan emails only, there are no actual mail box exists in it. Regards, Mohammad Ejaz Assistant Director -

Re: Tracking down a mail forwarding loop

2015-02-11 Thread LuKreme
> On Feb 11, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > LuKreme: >> Received: from thenewestsecret.net (unknown [170.130.246.215]) >>by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E42212DC0 >>for <*bob*@covisp.net>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:53:22 -0700 (MST) >> Delivered-To: *bob*@covis

Re: Tracking down a mail forwarding loop

2015-02-11 Thread Wietse Venema
LuKreme: > Received: from thenewestsecret.net (unknown [170.130.246.215]) > by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E42212DC0 > for <*bob*@covisp.net>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:53:22 -0700 (MST) > Delivered-To: *bob*@covisp.net > Received: by 170.130.246.215 with SMTP id > 998S7h4.

Re: Postscreen rejecting with 450, on postfix restart, gets immediately through

2015-02-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Shawn Heisey: > On 2/11/2015 3:24 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > just don't enable deep protocol tests if you don't want 450 rejects and > > rob0's example is nice but don't blindly follow howtos without real > > understanding > > > > http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html > > http://www.p

Re: Postscreen rejecting with 450, on postfix restart, gets immediately through

2015-02-11 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 12.02.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Shawn Heisey: On 2/11/2015 3:24 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: just don't enable deep protocol tests if you don't want 450 rejects and rob0's example is nice but don't blindly follow howtos without real understanding http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html ht

Re: Postscreen rejecting with 450, on postfix restart, gets immediately through

2015-02-11 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 2/11/2015 3:24 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > just don't enable deep protocol tests if you don't want 450 rejects and > rob0's example is nice but don't blindly follow howtos without real > understanding > > http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html > http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README

Re: Postscreen rejecting with 450, on postfix restart, gets immediately through

2015-02-11 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 11.02.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Shawn Heisey: Currently my production mail relay for work (sitting between Exchange and the Internet) uses Postfix 2.9.3 on Debian 6. I'm building up a new system using Postfix 2.11.0 on Ubuntu 14, and incorporating postscreen as the first line of defense. Almos

Postscreen rejecting with 450, on postfix restart, gets immediately through

2015-02-11 Thread Shawn Heisey
Currently my production mail relay for work (sitting between Exchange and the Internet) uses Postfix 2.9.3 on Debian 6. I'm building up a new system using Postfix 2.11.0 on Ubuntu 14, and incorporating postscreen as the first line of defense. Almost all the software is installed with distro packa

Re: Overwrite From Header with Envelope Address

2015-02-11 Thread Christian Rößner
> Am 11.02.2015 um 17:35 schrieb Mohammad Isargar : > > Hi there, > > We have a situation where Postfix installed with a single domain, serving a > subnet of local LAN users and SASL authentication enforced in order to send > emails. > > Even though that we know that the actual sender can be

Re: Overwrite From Header with Envelope Address

2015-02-11 Thread Mohammad Isargar
I appreciate your comment, wietse. I will go the Milter way. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mohammad Isargar: > > Hi there, > > > > We have a situation where Postfix installed with a single domain, > serving a > > subnet of local LAN users and SASL authentication enforce

Re: Overwrite From Header with Envelope Address

2015-02-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Mohammad Isargar: > Hi there, > > We have a situation where Postfix installed with a single domain, serving a > subnet of local LAN users and SASL authentication enforced in order to send > emails. > > Even though that we know that the actual sender can be found by checking > full email headers,

Overwrite From Header with Envelope Address

2015-02-11 Thread Mohammad Isargar
Hi there, We have a situation where Postfix installed with a single domain, serving a subnet of local LAN users and SASL authentication enforced in order to send emails. Even though that we know that the actual sender can be found by checking full email headers, but one of our security requiremen

Re: DMARC Reports check

2015-02-11 Thread James B. Byrne
On Wed, February 11, 2015 06:28, John wrote: > So far all the DMARC reports I have received appear to be the result > of somebody posting to a mailing list. Normally one only receives a DMARC report when there is a violation of the SPF or the DKIM signature is invalid for a message signed by your

Postfix as local forwarding

2015-02-11 Thread Patrick Serru Laposte
Hello All, I am a Linux user. I have a domain hosted a mutualised way, in an other country. The hoster proposes SMTP(AUTH), POP3 and IMAP servers services. The mail accounts for "the hosted" domain are limited, but it is possible to use a mail box for all "undelivered mails collector".

Re: DMARC Reports check

2015-02-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 11, 2015 6:28:51 AM EST, John wrote: >So far all the DMARC reports I have received appear to be the result of > >somebody posting to a mailing list. >Is it normal for mailing lists cause DMARC reports? >Is there some way of filtering out these reports, which in my opinion >are false?

DMARC Reports check

2015-02-11 Thread John
So far all the DMARC reports I have received appear to be the result of somebody posting to a mailing list. Is it normal for mailing lists cause DMARC reports? Is there some way of filtering out these reports, which in my opinion are false? -- John Allen KLaM ---