Re: Testing DANE

2014-11-27 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: which shows a non-broken DoE response, so it looks your domain is all set. Though sometimes the issue is triggered by a wildcard at the zone apex ("*.example.com") that is incorretly applied to I stopped using wildcards for my active used domains. T

Email Branding Solutions

2014-11-27 Thread Grim Reaper
Hi there I am looking for a email branding solution that can integrate with Postfix. I have been searching, but it has been unsuccessful. The solution must be-able to cater for a ISP environment. Kind Regards

Re: Simultaneously specifying both a recipient and a transport?

2014-11-27 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 09:43:59AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Normally, Postfix makes delivery decisions based on the recipient > address. If you want to deliver the same recipient in multiple > places, then you need to create a backup copy of the message: > > - Either send the backup copy dir

Re: Testing DANE

2014-11-27 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:12:01AM +0100, Dirk St?cker wrote: > after nearly a year I was now able to setup a testing domain which supports > DANE with a German domain provider. Now I'm in the testing stage to see if I > did everything right. > > DNSSEC-validation is fine: > http://dnssec-debugge

Re: Simultaneously specifying both a recipient and a transport?

2014-11-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Nicolas Boullis: > Sorry if it wasn't clear: "anyuser" and "sameuser" where supposed to be > the same local part. > In my current prototype, f...@example.net is copied to > f...@email-backup.example.net, b...@example.net to > b...@email-backup.example.net and so on' > > If I change the local pa

Re: Simultaneously specifying both a recipient and a transport?

2014-11-27 Thread Nicolas Boullis
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 02:59:25PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > no, but you can add a transport for "sameu...@example.net" > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#transport_maps Sorry if it wasn’t clear: "anyuser" and "sameuser" where supposed to be the same local part. In my current p

Re: Simultaneously specifying both a recipient and a transport?

2014-11-27 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 27.11.2014 um 14:54 schrieb Nicolas Boullis: On an e-mail system where the storage is backed up daily, if the mailbox storage fails, I may loose up to one day of e-mail. To avoid this, I am willing back up all incoming emails, so I can replay them if I ever have to restore the mailboxes. Cur

Simultaneously specifying both a recipient and a transport?

2014-11-27 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi, On an e-mail system where the storage is backed up daily, if the mailbox storage fails, I may loose up to one day of e-mail. To avoid this, I am willing back up all incoming emails, so I can replay them if I ever have to restore the mailboxes. Currently, I defined a recipient_bcc map that

Re: Testing DANE

2014-11-27 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Dirk Stöcker : > Hello, > > after nearly a year I was now able to setup a testing domain which > supports DANE with a German domain provider. Now I'm in the testing > stage to see if I did everything right. > > DNSSEC-validation is fine: > http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/cryptedmail.eu

Testing DANE

2014-11-27 Thread Dirk Stöcker
Hello, after nearly a year I was now able to setup a testing domain which supports DANE with a German domain provider. Now I'm in the testing stage to see if I did everything right. DNSSEC-validation is fine: http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/cryptedmail.eu DANE/TLSA existence is fine: