Re: bcc depending upon content type

2014-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Ralf Hauser: > Messages with a certain content type should be bcc'd to an additional > address for my use-case at hand. Wietse Venema: > That is currently not built into Postfix, but it could be done with > a Milter: in the header and body event handlers look at the content, > and in the end-of-me

Re: bcc depending upon content type

2014-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Noel Jones: > Maybe I misunderstood... I thought the OP was trying to add a > recipient_bcc_maps on a specific smtpd listener, and it didn't work > as he expected (due to recipient_bcc_maps implemented in cleanup). That is correct. > That's why my example showed setting receive_override_options e

Re: bcc depending upon content type

2014-11-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 11/17/2014 1:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Noel Jones: > [ Charset windows-1252 converted... ] >> On 11/17/2014 11:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> Ralf Hauser: When I define a secondary smtpd in master.cf and give it the -o=recipient_bcc_maps this has no effect. >>> >>> Ta

Re[3]: Try delivery to backup MX if smtp greeting fail - SOLVED

2014-11-17 Thread Michal Kurka
Dne 17.11.2014 v 19:43 Michal Kurka napsal(a): > Dne 17.11.2014 v 19:05 Noel Jones napsal(a): > > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_mx_address_limit > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_mx_session_limit > > Thanks for tips. For "smtp_mx_address_limit" I use default value "

Re: bcc depending upon content type

2014-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Noel Jones: [ Charset windows-1252 converted... ] > On 11/17/2014 11:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Ralf Hauser: > >> When I define a secondary smtpd in master.cf and give it the > >>-o=recipient_bcc_maps > >> > >> this has no effect. > > > > Take a look at: > > http://www.postfix.org/postcon

Re[2]: Try delivery to backup MX if smtp greeting fail

2014-11-17 Thread Michal Kurka
Dne 17.11.2014 v 18:51 Wietse Venema napsal(a): > Michal Kurka: > > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport > > Do you have transport map entries for destination.cz? No. - :~ # cat /etc/postfix/transport relay1.cz smtp:[other.time

Re: Try delivery to backup MX if smtp greeting fail

2014-11-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 11/17/2014 11:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Michal Kurka: >> transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport > > Do you have transport map entries for destination.cz? > > Wietse > And also: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_mx_address_limit and quite likely: http://www.postfix

Re: bcc depending upon content type

2014-11-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 11/17/2014 11:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ralf Hauser: >> When I define a secondary smtpd in master.cf and give it the >>-o=recipient_bcc_maps >> >> this has no effect. > > Take a look at: > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#receive_override_options > > Wietse > But IIRC th

Re: Try delivery to backup MX if smtp greeting fail

2014-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Michal Kurka: > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport Do you have transport map entries for destination.cz? Wietse

Try delivery to backup MX if smtp greeting fail

2014-11-17 Thread Michal Kurka
Hello. I send mails to badly (but apparently RFC compliant) destination. MX of destination are: - :~ # host -t mx destination.cz destination.cz mail is handled by 10 cax.destination.cz. destination.cz mail is handled by 20 cbx.destination

Re: bcc depending upon content type

2014-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Ralf Hauser: > When I define a secondary smtpd in master.cf and give it the >-o=recipient_bcc_maps > > this has no effect. Take a look at: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#receive_override_options Wietse

Re: Virtual Hosting Behavior

2014-11-17 Thread Josh McKee
Thank you both for the confirmation. I suspected this was the behavior however as I'm new to Postfix I wanted to be certain I didn't misconfigure anything. It appears I have everything configured as needed. I will, as recommend, add the @localhost qualifier to the right hand side. You may wish

Re: Virtual Hosting Behavior

2014-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Josh McKee: > The configuration is fairly straightforward and I've copied the appropriate > files from the Sendmail configuration to the Postfix configuration and all > seems to be operating as expected with one exception. If the UNIX user > account on the right hand side of the virtual mapping

Re: Virtual Hosting Behavior

2014-11-17 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 17.11.2014 um 15:58 schrieb Josh McKee: 6postmas...@example.compostmaster 7i...@example.comjoe 8sa...@example.com jane If the UNIX user "joe" does not exist in the UNIX password file mail sent to "i...@example.com" is accepted. With the Sendmail c

Virtual Hosting Behavior

2014-11-17 Thread Josh McKee
I am in the process of moving a mail system from Sendmail to Postfix. The system in question currently handles a small number of domains in a virtual configuration. I am attempting to replicate the existing functionality with Postfix’s virtual domain capability. The specific configuration to be

Re: tlsmgr high io load because of session cache

2014-11-17 Thread Emmanuel Fusté
Le 14/11/2014 18:47, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit : On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 05:20:14PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: So gmail.com and postfix.org offer and actually reuses sessions, On the other hand, storing hotmail, AOL or Yahoo sessions is just a waste of I/O, since they are rarely if ever reusa