On 11/10/14 13:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
Nagy, Attila:
Hi,
What is the most effective way of giving back a 4XX temporary error for
all mails in postfix, but in a way that they are delivered to milter
programs (including message body, so smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions
doesn't work)?
Give the app
On 2014-11-10 21:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
You're looking for an SRS milter. Make sure you get one that's well
designed.
Hi Viktor,
I've been using pfix-srsd from the pfixtools GitHub repo:
https://github.com/Fruneau/pfixtools
Perhaps it's simply the nature of SRS or I have it misconfigure
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:31:32 -0500
"shamu...@gmail.com" wrote:
> I want postfix to rewrite this message's Sender as
> exam...@my-domain.com so that other-domain.com's mail server doesn't
> marked this mail as spam.
>
are you sure if changed the sender will not mark it as
spam?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:31:32PM -0500, shamu...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have a virtual alias table like this
>
> exam...@my-domain.com exam...@other-domain.com
>
> other-domain.com is not controlled by me, it could be gmail.com or
> hotmail.com
>
> if a sender some...@sender-domain.com sends an
I have a virtual alias table like this
exam...@my-domain.com exam...@other-domain.com
other-domain.com is not controlled by me, it could be gmail.com or
hotmail.com
if a sender some...@sender-domain.com sends an email to
exam...@my-domain.com, postfix forwards this message correctly to
exam...@o
Martin Vegter:
> I am using body checks as a very simple spam filter. It catches most of
> the marketing emails, with no false positives (so far):
>
> If a message is rejected, I can see it in my logs, i.e.:
>
> message content rejected
>
> But I am wondering what would happen, if a false posi
I am using body checks as a very simple spam filter. It catches most of
the marketing emails, with no false positives (so far):
If a message is rejected, I can see it in my logs, i.e.:
message content rejected
But I am wondering what would happen, if a false positive occurs. in
that case, I wo
shamu...@gmail.com:
> Thank you Wietse.
>
> What if I change the requirement so all emails sent by non-authorized
> senders to these protected addresses, should be delivered to
> ad...@bitbridge.com. No rejection.
Postfix does not implement arbitrary mail delivery policies. Instead
of implement
Thank you Wietse.
What if I change the requirement so all emails sent by non-authorized senders
to these protected addresses, should be delivered to ad...@bitbridge.com. No
rejection.
What can I do to get it implemented. Thanks again.
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:10 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wi
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:28:17AM +0100, Lars Heide wrote:
> > Was there a prior connection shortly before that where the handshake
> > failed for some other reason?
>
> No, there is no prior connection according to our logs, which is
> strange, now that you mention it.
A possible cause is that
shamu...@gmail.com:
> hello all, I have a server with postfix and I want the following setup:
>
> 1. Only certain sender addresses can send email to patterned email
> addresses.
> For example, protecte...@example.com and protecte...@example.com only allow
> the following senders
> a...@domain.com
There may be other ways to do this, but I use a (locally written) milter to
do this.
John
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:00 AM, shamu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> hello all, I have a server with postfix and I want the following setup:
>
> 1. Only certain sender addresses can send email to patterned email
>
hello all, I have a server with postfix and I want the following setup:
1. Only certain sender addresses can send email to patterned email
addresses.
For example, protecte...@example.com and protecte...@example.com only allow
the following senders
a...@domain.com
d...@domain.com
2. if any sender
ma...@nucleus.it:
> The problem is that cyrus is not expecting user@domain1@domain2 like
> senders but investigating further i founded rfc 2822.
>
> According to rfc2822 Appendix B:
> Routes in addresses not allowed
> Routes in return path not allowed
>
> I searched in the mans and documentatio
Nagy, Attila:
> Hi,
>
> What is the most effective way of giving back a 4XX temporary error for
> all mails in postfix, but in a way that they are delivered to milter
> programs (including message body, so smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions
> doesn't work)?
Give the appropriate reply in the Milter
Am 10.11.2014 um 13:12 schrieb Nagy, Attila:
What is the most effective way of giving back a 4XX temporary error for
all mails in postfix, but in a way that they are delivered to milter
programs (including message body, so smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions
doesn't work)?
So basically I would like
Hi,
What is the most effective way of giving back a 4XX temporary error for
all mails in postfix, but in a way that they are delivered to milter
programs (including message body, so smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions
doesn't work)?
So basically I would like to temporary fail all messages which g
Hi all,
checking the logs of a mailserver we found a bounce to an external
sender with "routed sender", a sender with double @ like
user@domain1@domain2 .
Postfix 2.10.3 is configured to deliver the mail to a local Cyrus with
the deliver command and the problem is that postfix pipe process bounced
Am 07.11.2014 um 16:00 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
>
> Was there a prior connection shortly before that where the handshake
> failed for some other reason?
No, there is no prior connection according to our logs, which is
strange, now that you mention it.
>
>> They use Kerio Connect 8.4.0 RC 1. Accord
19 matches
Mail list logo
