On 10/27/2014 08:45 PM, Chris wrote:
> Does someone happen to know, what the issue is?
Sorry, I didn't remember the correct syntax in my
smtpd_sender_login_maps=proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-sender-login-maps.cf
configuration.
--
Gruß,
Christian
Chris:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm trying to configure postfix as a smarthost. It rewrites the sender
> address with sender_canonical_maps.
>
> : Sender address rejected:
That is the SMTP "MAIL FROM" address/
> not owned by user
> strohh...@example2.com (in reply to RCPT TO command)
And that is the S
Dear All,
I'm trying to configure postfix as a smarthost. It rewrites the sender
address with sender_canonical_maps.
: host smtp.example2.com[1.2.3.4] said: 553 5.7.1
: Sender address rejected: not owned by user
strohh...@example2.com (in reply to RCPT TO command)
I'm surprised that both address
Just for info
http://www.dnsbl.com/2014/10/status-of-rblorbitrblcom-dead.html
...
If you're actually using this RBL in your MTAs, now's a good time to
stop. (this RBL is broken on 5 out of it's 6 delegated nameservers
across 3 separate providers)."
...
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
On 27.10.2014 13:58, Ronnie Tartar wrote:
> Is there any way to configure postfix to drop without a bounce emails with
> destination @test.com?
For testing it's usually better if you can see the mails. If your test
setup has it's own postfix just use the follow virtual_alias_maps (pcre)
which will
On 22.10.2014 04:03, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> as for 'cleanup' : if this user's home PC is 'infected/hacked', if I just
> issue a new password, spam will start again ?
Do you limit the amount of mails a user can send per time slot? (like
100 mails in a 6 hour period). If not, please do, you can u
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:42:38PM +0100, Gabor Lenart wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:13:10AM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> > query_filter = (&(ObjectClass=dNSDomain)(dc=%2))
> [...]
> > [root@mta03 /opt/local/etc/postfix]# postmap -v -q balius
> > ldap:/opt/local/etc/postfix/ldap_virtual_m
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:13:10AM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> query_filter = (&(ObjectClass=dNSDomain)(dc=%2))
[...]
> [root@mta03 /opt/local/etc/postfix]# postmap -v -q balius
> ldap:/opt/local/etc/postfix/ldap_virtual_mailbox_domains.cf
I guess, since you used %2 in the query_filter,
Ronnie Tartar:
> Or in this case, without an undeliverable message being generated.
With Mr Schetter's solution, Postfix rejects the recipient at the
SMTP port. It is the responsibility of the remote SMTP client to
send (or not send) the non-delivery notification.
WQietse
I'm setting up LDAP to be used by Postfix, Dovecot, etc. for mail and other
stuff. I'm not understanding why postfix is failing to find the virtual domain
in question. I've got Dovecot setup and working against it, at least for
authentication at this point.
[root@mta03 /opt/local/etc/postfix
Am 27.10.2014 um 13:58 schrieb Ronnie Tartar:
We use postfix to send out all of our emails from our web applications.
When programmers test, they seem to always use @test.com email addresses.
Is there any way to configure postfix to drop without a bounce emails with
destination @test.com?
fi
Or in this case, without an undeliverable message being generated.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ronnie Tartar
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 8:58 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Drop outboun
Am 27.10.2014 um 13:58 schrieb Ronnie Tartar:
> We use postfix to send out all of our emails from our web applications.
> When programmers test, they seem to always use @test.com email addresses.
>
> Is there any way to configure postfix to drop without a bounce emails with
> destination @test.com
We use postfix to send out all of our emails from our web applications.
When programmers test, they seem to always use @test.com email addresses.
Is there any way to configure postfix to drop without a bounce emails with
destination @test.com?
Thanks
On 10/26/2014 11:56 PM, ferriswheel wrote:
> yes, that was the problem. maximal_queue_lifetime and
> bounce_queue_lifetime were set to '0' regards john
So, maybe you should post postconf -n output and see if there any other
obviously massive fails in your config?
Hi,
On 10/22/2014 04:03 AM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
[snip]
is monitoring blacklists just 'a good idea'? a must ? or?
[snip]
I use this:
http://whmscripts.net/tips/2010/rbl-check-initial-release/
HTH,
Mikael
16 matches
Mail list logo