Re: Suppress specific restriction in reject message

2014-10-03 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:19:24PM +0200, Henrik Larsson wrote: > If you reject a message in helo, sender or recipient restrictions, the > specific restriction is shown in the reject message as shown below: > 554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Rejected > 554 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: Reject

Suppress specific restriction in reject message

2014-10-03 Thread Henrik Larsson
If you reject a message in helo, sender or recipient restrictions, the specific restriction is shown in the reject message as shown below: 554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Rejected 554 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: Rejected 554 5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Rejected Is it possible to

Re: Splitting email.

2014-10-03 Thread Wietse Venema
giacomo: > > > > > I would like to split this email on the relative folder of the > > > > > target user of domain. The internal mail server use postfix. The > > > > > server work fine with virtual user sending e receiving mail > > > > > internally. It's possible this operation? Is there any progr

Re: Splitting email.

2014-10-03 Thread giacomo
On 01.10.14, 15:29, Wietse Venema wrote: > giacomo: > > On 30.09.14, 16:26, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > giacomo: > > > > Hello at all, > > > > I would like to split email from an external mail server (from my ISP) > > > > to > > > > an internal mail server. The ISP receive all mail of the domain i

Re: FYI: blocking attachment extensions

2014-10-03 Thread LuKreme
> On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:26 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > > Am 03.10.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Philip Prindeville: >> I don’t necessarily trust just the extension of the filename. >> >> I’d also look at the file’s magic (same as the OS does) as well as the >> content-type. >> Can’t be too thorough

Re: FYI: blocking attachment extensions

2014-10-03 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Philip Prindeville: > I don’t necessarily trust just the extension of the filename. > > I’d also look at the file’s magic (same as the OS does) as well as the > content-type. > Can’t be too thorough that topic is not a matter of trusting it's a matter of put diff

Re: FYI: blocking attachment extensions

2014-10-03 Thread Philip Prindeville
On Sep 18, 2014, at 7:45 AM, terrygalant.li...@fastest.cc wrote: > I've been reading the discussion here and the various approaches to blocking > extensions > > I'd gotten this from a friend awhile ago, and have been using it > > With > > postfix_header_checks = pcre:/path/to/custom_hea

Re: Return-Path Configuration

2014-10-03 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 08:56:30AM -0400, Ronnie Tartar wrote: > > > I am doing some custom headers, specifically the Return-Path header. But > > Postfix strips out the header and puts the reply to address in there. RFC 5321, section 4.4, Trace Information: A message-origi

Re: Return-Path Configuration

2014-10-03 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 08:56:30AM -0400, Ronnie Tartar wrote: > I am doing some custom headers, specifically the Return-Path header. But > Postfix strips out the header and puts the reply to address in there. Correct. The "Return-Path" header is not for end-to-end transmission. It is added by

Return-Path Configuration

2014-10-03 Thread Ronnie Tartar
Hi, I am using Postfix on Centos 6. I am doing some custom headers, specifically the Return-Path header. But Postfix strips out the header and puts the reply to address in there. I have searched and cannot seem to find a solution for this. I would like to something up that will accept the head

Re: Forwarding mail to hotmail.com

2014-10-03 Thread Dave Jones
I filter mail for a lot of mailboxes where I normally see 20+ messages from account-security-nore...@account.microsoft.com per day. The last one I see is on 10/1/14 at 13:25 GMT-5 (Central US). On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > [ Bcc to someone at Microsoft who may be abl