On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:19:24PM +0200, Henrik Larsson wrote:
> If you reject a message in helo, sender or recipient restrictions, the
> specific restriction is shown in the reject message as shown below:
> 554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Rejected
> 554 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: Reject
If you reject a message in helo, sender or recipient restrictions, the
specific restriction is shown in the reject message as shown below:
554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Rejected
554 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: Rejected
554 5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Rejected
Is it possible to
giacomo:
> > > > > I would like to split this email on the relative folder of the
> > > > > target user of domain. The internal mail server use postfix. The
> > > > > server work fine with virtual user sending e receiving mail
> > > > > internally. It's possible this operation? Is there any progr
On 01.10.14, 15:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> giacomo:
> > On 30.09.14, 16:26, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > giacomo:
> > > > Hello at all,
> > > > I would like to split email from an external mail server (from my ISP)
> > > > to
> > > > an internal mail server. The ISP receive all mail of the domain i
> On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:26 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.10.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
>> I don’t necessarily trust just the extension of the filename.
>>
>> I’d also look at the file’s magic (same as the OS does) as well as the
>> content-type.
>> Can’t be too thorough
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> I don’t necessarily trust just the extension of the filename.
>
> I’d also look at the file’s magic (same as the OS does) as well as the
> content-type.
> Can’t be too thorough
that topic is not a matter of trusting
it's a matter of put diff
On Sep 18, 2014, at 7:45 AM, terrygalant.li...@fastest.cc wrote:
> I've been reading the discussion here and the various approaches to blocking
> extensions
>
> I'd gotten this from a friend awhile ago, and have been using it
>
> With
>
> postfix_header_checks = pcre:/path/to/custom_hea
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 08:56:30AM -0400, Ronnie Tartar wrote:
>
> > I am doing some custom headers, specifically the Return-Path header. But
> > Postfix strips out the header and puts the reply to address in there.
RFC 5321, section 4.4, Trace Information:
A message-origi
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 08:56:30AM -0400, Ronnie Tartar wrote:
> I am doing some custom headers, specifically the Return-Path header. But
> Postfix strips out the header and puts the reply to address in there.
Correct. The "Return-Path" header is not for end-to-end transmission.
It is added by
Hi,
I am using Postfix on Centos 6.
I am doing some custom headers, specifically the Return-Path header. But
Postfix strips out the header and puts the reply to address in there.
I have searched and cannot seem to find a solution for this. I would like
to something up that will accept the head
I filter mail for a lot of mailboxes where I normally see 20+ messages from
account-security-nore...@account.microsoft.com per day.
The last one I see is on 10/1/14 at 13:25 GMT-5 (Central US).
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> [ Bcc to someone at Microsoft who may be abl
11 matches
Mail list logo