Wietse Venema writes:
[join vs union]
I think there is something to be said for either name. It does not matter to
me, I think you should decide on a name, if you should choose to include
such functionality, to ensure it fits with Postfix's naming conventions
best.
That was a question
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:29:47AM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> A good way to check if this bug applies to your case is to "cat /proc/mounts |
> grep unbound". As you can see there are several mounts in place in my example:
I don't see any of these at the present, but will look if / when
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> * Will Yardley :
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:54:11AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > * Your DNS resolution is not functioning, which could also
> > > explain slow login, but in this case, you'd generally max
> > > out the smtpd(8) process limit.
> >
* Will Yardley :
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:54:11AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > * Your DNS resolution is not functioning, which could also
> > explain slow login, but in this case, you'd generally max
> > out the smtpd(8) process limit.
>
> Yes, this one occurred to me too,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:54:11AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> * Your DNS resolution is not functioning, which could also
> explain slow login, but in this case, you'd generally max
> out the smtpd(8) process limit.
Yes, this one occurred to me too, but I did test that specific
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:39:21PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> I've had Postfix seemingly stop responding 3 times on 2 systems over the
> weekend. In all cases, the system is accessible, but logging in is
> sluggish, however, load, iowait, memory usage, etc. all appear perfectly
> normal. Postfix
I've had Postfix seemingly stop responding 3 times on 2 systems over the
weekend. In all cases, the system is accessible, but logging in is
sluggish, however, load, iowait, memory usage, etc. all appear perfectly
normal. Postfix doesn't log any unusual errors / warnings / etc., but
simply seems to
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:17:03AM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> > Yeah, all the time. Each of the company employees when
> > he's out-of-office and connecting remotely.
>
> that is pure bullshit in that case they are using SMTP
> authentication and so they are not affected by MTA rules
> or
Am 14.09.2014 um 01:54 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> On Sep 13, 2014, at 7:35 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>> Am 13.09.2014 um 15:10 schrieb LuKreme:
>>> On 12 Sep 2014, at 13:55 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
>> However, any time I connect vi
