On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:28:24PM +, Xie, Wei wrote:
> > What you're proposing is not viable, and seems to serve no purpose.
> > You should explain the problem you're trying to solve by adding
> > these, rather than the problems you're having doing so.
>
> When the message hits our outbound
Viktor,
>>Even on an MSA the "To:" address may list multiple recipients, which one
>>becomes "Resent-From:"? What happens when the "To:" is a list in your
organization rather than a public list?
>>What you're proposing is not viable, and seems to serve no purpose.
>>You should explain the
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 08:59:44PM +, Xie, Wei wrote:
> If you include mailing list, in general "The To: header does not represent
> the recipient of a message.".
Also when a message is Bcc'd by the sender.
> Now, we only need to consider the simple example below because
> the messages relat
Daniele,
If you include mailing list, in general "The To: header does not represent the
recipient of a message.". Now, we only need to consider the simple example
below because the messages related to mailing lists do not hit our outbound
Postfix servers.
From: a...@yahoo.com
To: test...@osu.
On 05/08/2014 22:30, Xie, Wei wrote:
> Daniele,
>
>>> The To: header does not represent the recipient of a message.
>
> My understanding is "To: header" (test...@osu.edu) represents original
> recipient of a message, right?
No. Look at this same message. I recommend you to document yourself a
b
Daniele,
>> The To: header does not represent the recipient of a message.
My understanding is "To: header" (test...@osu.edu) represents original
recipient of a message, right?
Thanks,
Carl
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
On 05/08/2014 22:18, Xie, Wei wrote:
> For example,
>
> From: a...@yahoo.com
> To: test...@osu.edu (is forwarded to d...@hotmail.com)
>
> In header_checks, I use the rule " /^To: (.*)/ PREPEND Resent-From:
> $1" to extract original recipient test...@osu.edu from the header of
> test emails and
Viktor,
>>Your reply is HTML-formatted, and takes too much work to de-HTML.
>>So I can't reply in detail.
I change my previous email to plain text format and send it to you again.
>>> The most fundamental is that the original recipient that is forwarded often
>>> does not appear in any headers
Viktor,
I change my email to plain text format and send you again.
Thanks,
Carl
From: Xie, Wei
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 12:57 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc: Xie, Wei
Subject: RE: How to fetch From address from header via Postfix head_check?
Viktor,
Sorry to reply to you lately du
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 04:56:57PM +, Xie, Wei wrote:
> Sorry to reply to you lately due to some reasons.
Your reply is HTML-formatted, and takes too much work to de-HTML.
So I can't reply in detail.
> The logic of our requirement or idea is described as the following
> syntax in terms of he
Enabling debug for the Servers IP, here comes.
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 250-ERLAY_HOST
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 250-PIPELINING
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 25
On 05.08.2014 20:08, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/5/2014 12:53 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>> 2014-08-05 14:47 GMT-03:00 Noel Jones :
>>> On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
Hi!
This postfix act as a Relay.
From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For the
On 8/5/2014 12:53 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> 2014-08-05 14:47 GMT-03:00 Noel Jones :
>> On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> This postfix act as a Relay.
>>> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
>>>
>>> # postconf message_siz
On 8/5/14, 1:42 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> 2014-08-05 14:37 GMT-03:00 Glenn Sieb :
>> And was that command run on the relay that is showing SIZE 1000?
>
> The command is from the Server -> Relay. So, yes.
> All other servers (40 or so) the result is the same: 20MB.
>
>>
>> If so, did yo
On 8/5/14, 1:47 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> And this doesn't look like postfix. Either there's some sort of
> proxy interfering with SMTP, or this isn't connecting to the same
> server. Maybe some security software or firewall on the oddball server?
Good point.. I missed the difference in responses
2014-08-05 14:47 GMT-03:00 Noel Jones :
> On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This postfix act as a Relay.
>> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
>>
>> # postconf message_size_limit
>> message_size_limit = 20971520
>>
>>
>> Here is
On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This postfix act as a Relay.
> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
>
> # postconf message_size_limit
> message_size_limit = 20971520
>
>
> Here is the telnet response from all servers
>
> # teln
On 8/5/14, 1:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> This postfix act as a Relay.
> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
>
> # postconf message_size_limit
> message_size_limit = 20971520
And was that command run on the relay that is showing SIZE 1000?
If s
Hi!
This postfix act as a Relay.
>From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
# postconf message_size_limit
message_size_limit = 20971520
Here is the telnet response from all servers
# telnet relay 25
Trying XXX...
Connected to XXX.
Escape character is '^]'.
22
Viktor,
Sorry to reply to you lately due to some reasons.
>>Actually you would not like to this. Because setting "Resent-From:"
>>to duplicate the "From:" address is silly.
I just wanted to do a technical test to see how to fetch From address from
header , not really to do setting "Res
On 05 Aug 2014, at 15:53, Andre Luiz Paiz wrote:
> Quoting Andre Luiz Paiz :
>
>> Is there an alternative?
>
> Good morning,
> Does anybody have some tips to help me?
Yes, I already gave you the 'check_sender_access' option as an
alternative. Also, please do not use HTML to post to lists like
Quoting Alexandre Ellert :
Hello,
You should have a look at DMARC.
If you announce a reject policy in your DNS and configure opendmarc
milter on your inbound MX, that will do what you want.
Alexandre
_Quoting Andre Luiz Paiz :_
_Quoting DTNX Postmaster :_
_On 04 Aug 2014, at 19:2
Hello,
You should have a look at DMARC.
If you announce a reject policy in your DNS and configure opendmarc milter
on your inbound MX, that will do what you want.
Alexandre
Quoting Andre Luiz Paiz :
Quoting DTNX Postmaster :
On 04 Aug 2014, at 19:25, Andre Luiz Paiz wrote:
I´m receiving some
Quoting Andre Luiz Paiz :
Quoting DTNX Postmaster :
On 04 Aug 2014, at 19:25, Andre Luiz Paiz
wrote:
I´m receiving some e-mails coming from outside with the FROM pointing
to my local domain. This causes confusion on my antispam tools.
Ex: I received an e-mail from the internet with
webmas.
Hello.
I need to build SASL with unusual path to plugins. Its "configure"
script contains --with-plugindir option and it works. However,
Postfix does not works with this directory. The error:
postfix/smtpd[5401]: looking for plugins in '/etc/postfix/sasl', failed to open
directory, error: No suc
25 matches
Mail list logo
