Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
> > I do not know whether there is a email server there, but dk. has a A
> > record, thus user@dk might be a valid email address...
>
> Though "technically" valid, it is in practice unusable. Almost
> all senders w
On 16 Jun 2014, at 17:22, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
>> I do not know whether there is a email server there, but dk. has a A
>> record, thus user@dk might be a valid email address...
>
> Though "technically" valid, it is in practice u
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> I do not know whether there is a email server there, but dk. has a A
> record, thus user@dk might be a valid email address...
Though "technically" valid, it is in practice unusable. Almost
all senders will rewrite this to . Getting
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:12:03AM +0200, Per Thorsheim wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane/
> "In WG Last Call"
>
> Any estimate on when this might become final Viktor?
With any luck, around July IETF. The WG chairs are trying to
coordinate progress on both
Serkan ?zen:
> When I redirect incoming mail that has 3 recipients to my script,
> I see that my script (it reads mail from stdin and creates file
> with the stream coming from stdin.) creates 3 files in total, one
> for each recipient. What I really want is that to create only one
> file.
In that
Am 16.06.2014 09:45, schrieb Alessandro Vesely:
> I tag it OT, as the comment is on the policy itself.
>
> On Sun 15/Jun/2014 22:11:29 +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>> Am 15.06.2014 22:01, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru:
>>> I Have been reading:
>>> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.h
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane/
"In WG Last Call"
Any estimate on when this might become final Viktor?
After Google named & shamed Comcast for not having starttls, many
well-known services are now establishing RFC 3207 starttls support.
Additionally people are bec
I tag it OT, as the comment is on the policy itself.
On Sun 15/Jun/2014 22:11:29 +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 15.06.2014 22:01, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru:
>> I Have been reading:
>> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
>> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
>> h
Le 16/06/2014 04:02, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:29:03AM +0900, Akihiro Koike wrote:
>
>> We are a registry operator of new generic top-level domain(gTLD).
>> Therefore we are interested in the impact of new gTLDs.
>> I'd like your thoughts on what kind of impact the appe
