Re: Support of read receipts

2014-06-15 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:51:43AM +0530, hyndavirap...@bel.co.in wrote: > Does postfix support Read receipts? If so, how to do? Yes, mostly by doing nothing (except perhaps rewriting the requested notification address as a sender address via canonical_maps or smtp_generic_maps). Read receipts a

[THREAD CLOSED]: REG:DSN Configuration in postfix

2014-06-15 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:48:10AM +0530, thirumalkumarkanakur...@bel.co.in wrote: > > thirumalkumarkanakur...@bel.co.in wrote: > > > > > In that case how to ensure that the mail has reached destination. > > > > You can't. Success notices are at the discretion of the destination, > > and there

Support of read receipts

2014-06-15 Thread hyndavirapuru
HI, Does postfix support Read receipts? If so, how to do? Hyndavi Every 3000 Sheets of paper costs us a tree.. Save trees... Conserve Trees. Don't print this email or any Files unless you really need to Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic messag

Re: REG:DSN Configuration in postfix

2014-06-15 Thread thirumalkumarkanakurthi
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 03:31:21PM +0530, > thirumalkumarkanakur...@bel.co.in wrote: > >> In that case how to ensure that the mail has reached destination. >> Because in my case relay server is sending success notification even it >> is >> unable to deliver the mail to the destination. > >

Re: impact of new gTLDs

2014-06-15 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:29:03AM +0900, Akihiro Koike wrote: > We are a registry operator of new generic top-level domain(gTLD). > Therefore we are interested in the impact of new gTLDs. > I'd like your thoughts on what kind of impact the appearance of new > gTLDs has on software implementation.

impact of new gTLDs

2014-06-15 Thread Akihiro Koike
Dear All, We are a registry operator of new generic top-level domain(gTLD). Therefore we are interested in the impact of new gTLDs. I'd like your thoughts on what kind of impact the appearance of new gTLDs has on software implementation. Best regards. -- Akihiro

RE: Before rushing into writing my own policy daemon for postfix, what are the options?

2014-06-15 Thread Marius Gologan
Hi, "From:" is a value in the header, it is passed during DATA. You need to build a script (for Postfix) to compare From: against sender=, sasl_sender= (parameters in Postfix). Explicit rejections are good for ISPs and legit senders, not for spammers. If you return a SMTP rejection, the spammer w

Re: Before rushing into writing my own policy daemon for postfix, what are the options?

2014-06-15 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 15.06.2014 23:53, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru: > On 06/15/2014 11:11 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >> what you describe is*the minimum* requirement of a sane MTA >> you must not allow senders you would not accept incoming messages >> and no - there are no exceptions for whatever user > I am not su

Re: Before rushing into writing my own policy daemon for postfix, what are the options?

2014-06-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, June 16, 2014 00:53:14 Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > On 06/15/2014 11:11 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > what you describe is*the minimum* requirement of a sane MTA > > you must not allow senders you would not accept incoming messages > > and no - there are no exceptions for whatever user >

Re: Before rushing into writing my own policy daemon for postfix, what are the options?

2014-06-15 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 06/15/2014 11:11 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: what you describe is*the minimum* requirement of a sane MTA you must not allow senders you would not accept incoming messages and no - there are no exceptions for whatever user I am not sure you understand it but there is little doubt we are talkin

Re: Postfix inserts artifacts when logging headers

2014-06-15 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 15.06.2014 22:48, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: >> header_checks is not designed for such things >> it's just limited basic functionality >> >> consider to use a policy-daemon with more features > > Rather: a milter. A policy-daemon doesn't see the mails' contents. agreed - until now no need for

Re: Postfix inserts artifacts when logging headers

2014-06-15 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
> header_checks is not designed for such things > it's just limited basic functionality > > consider to use a policy-daemon with more features Rather: a milter. A policy-daemon doesn't see the mails' contents. -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 Mün

Re: Before rushing into writing my own policy daemon for postfix, what are the options?

2014-06-15 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 15.06.2014 22:01, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru: > I Have been reading: > http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html > http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html > http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html > > And I am still unsure on how to go one step forward.. > I wa

Before rushing into writing my own policy daemon for postfix, what are the options?

2014-06-15 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
I Have been reading: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html And I am still unsure on how to go one step forward.. I want to allow my local SMTP authenticated users to be able to s

Re: filename format for maildir messages

2014-06-15 Thread Wietse Venema
> My preferred format would look something > like this: > > 2014-06-14__14-01-23.sender_subject.hostname Other people have already pointed out that this breaks when two messages arrive in the same second. And what should happen when a sender address contains a "_" character? If the idea is to