On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:57:30PM -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> Postfix seems happy with a domain name in mynetworks. I put IPs
> in there earlier and it didn't seem to work, but the domain names
> did -- I found how to fix my problem with an ASCII domain name in
> the config.
Apparently happy o
On Jun 1, 2014, at 8:39 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Thanks a lot, Victor, for looking through that mess of a config. I was in a bit
of an anxiety attack when I wrote the original message.
I've changed 'most everything you suggested (a lot of them were that way before
I started trying to figure
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/1/2014 1:52 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic
>> wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tonight, while checking Postfix config, I have stumbled upon something
>>> weird.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I
On 6/1/2014 4:22 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic wrote:
> Hello Viktor,
>
> I admit, I am not a guru in Postfix but I am trying.
> I do not understand where the confusion is?
>
> Using both my examples (mime_header_checks and header_checks), my executable
> (.bat) is blocked when I send a test e
On 6/1/2014 1:52 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic
> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>>
>>
>> Tonight, while checking Postfix config, I have stumbled upon something
>> weird.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am blocking executables and potentially dangerous extensions with
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 07:56:17PM -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> debug_peer_level = 5
Drop this down to 2, so you'll actually be able to see useful
logging, rather than low-level noise.
> debug_peer_list = bouldermedicaladvocate.com aerco.net
> mydestination =
> localhost, localdomain, localho
Hi Viktor,
Terrific advice. Much appreciated.
Cheers.
Andy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:26:47AM +1000, tswmmeejsdad . wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <
> postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On M
I have users who have virtual domains on my server. They both use them for web
sites and email. A little while ago, postfix stopped sending email. One of them
can send mail from his office to me, and can receive from anywhere. But he
can't send anywhere outside my domain.
The other one seems u
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:26:47AM +1000, tswmmeejsdad . wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:35:25AM +1000, tswmmeejsdad . wrote:
> >
> > > May 19 16:06:50 smtp01 postfix/smtpd[21940]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE
> > > from unknown[1
Thanks for the info Viktor. That sounds like a rather bold statement and I
don't think customers at times are willing to concede that it's something
on their end causing it.
Is there anything else that we could do further to prove to the customer
that it was their application that as you have said
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:35:25AM +1000, tswmmeejsdad . wrote:
> May 19 16:06:50 smtp01 postfix/smtpd[21940]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE
> from unknown[10.84.72.227]
The SMTP client neither closes the TCP socket nor sends QUIT after
completing a message delivery. Fix the client.
--
Am 02.06.2014 00:35, schrieb tswmmeejsdad .:
> We run a postfix STMP relay for customers. One customer is saying that their
> application is showing lots of
> timeouts on their end when it is trying to send emails via our STMP relay. We
> are also seeing the timeout errors in
> the mail log (sh
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:22:14AM +0300, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic wrote:
> I admit, I am not a guru in Postfix but I am trying.
> I do not understand where the confusion is?
The patterns in header_checks need to be identical to the patterns
in mime_header_checks. Usually, one simply has:
Hi All,
We run a postfix STMP relay for customers. One customer is saying that
their application is showing lots of timeouts on their end when it is
trying to send emails via our STMP relay. We are also seeing the timeout
errors in the mail log (shown below).
How do I troubleshoot something like
Hello Viktor,
I admit, I am not a guru in Postfix but I am trying.
I do not understand where the confusion is?
Using both my examples (mime_header_checks and header_checks), my executable
(.bat) is blocked when I send a test email from Outlook with the correct
REJECT text.
But, when testing from
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:54:48AM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> I merely pointed him down one possible path, did what I could to illuminate
> it without , and then left the rest to him.
s/down one possible path/up the garden path/
--
Viktor.
On Jun 2, 2014 4:18 AM, "Viktor Dukhovni"
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:52:44AM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
>
> > I'm not really familiar with the usage of pcre with postfix, but
> > [...]
>
> Therefore, you should not be adding to the OP's confusion.
Perhaps you can clear up the confu
Perhaps you can clear up the confusion here. You know everything and can
speak for the OP.
I merely pointed him down one possible path, did what I could to illuminate
it without , and then left the rest to him.
On Jun 2, 2014 4:18 AM, "Viktor Dukhovni"
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:52:44AM
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:52:44AM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> I'm not really familiar with the usage of pcre with postfix, but
> [...]
Therefore, you should not be adding to the OP's confusion.
--
Viktor.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic
wrote:
> Hello
>
>
>
> Tonight, while checking Postfix config, I have stumbled upon something
> weird.
>
>
>
> I am blocking executables and potentially dangerous extensions with
> header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
>
>
Wietse Venema:
> LaMont Jones:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:33:08AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Postfix snapshot 20140530 now supports dynamically-loadable database
> > > plugins, and Postfix shared libraries.
> > > The Postfix build/installation procedure has changed a bit, but
> > > there
Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic skrev den 2014-06-01 07:11
/^CONTENT-(DISPOSITION|TYPE).*NAMES*=S*"?(.*(.|=2E)(ADE|ADP|ASP|BAS|BAT|CHM|CMD|COM|CPL|CRT|DLL|EXE|HLP|HT[AT]|INF|INS|ISP|JSE?|LNK|MD[BETW]|MS[CIPT]|NWS|{[[:XDIGIT:]]{8}(?:-[[:XDIGIT:]]{4}){3}-[[:XDIGIT:]]{12}}|OPS|PCD|PIF|PRF|REG|SC[FRT]|S
On 06/01/2014 12:24 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:11:42AM +0300, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic wrote:
>
>> I am blocking executables and potentially dangerous extensions with
>> header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
>>
>> Inside header_checks.pcre I have:
>>
23 matches
Mail list logo
