Wietse
> When the above [transport map entry and dedicated transport] works
> as documented, then Postfix will deliver that mail in parallel
> with other deliveries. Only a statistical analysis over a longer
> time would reveal that some recipients are delivered via this
> dedicated master.cf SMTP
Thank you. What should I do to see that the deliveries to this particular
domain doesn't disturb the regular outbound mails? Is relay_transport is
advisable and if yes then can I just assign the same transport table to the
relay_transport.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postf
KK Patnaik:
> Hi,
>
> I have kept a transport map for the exclusive delivery of abcdmail.com but
> its again going along with the regular outbound mails. Please suggest.
>
> #Cat /etc/postfix/transport
>
> abcdmail.com abcd:abcdmail.com
>
> I added the below line in master.cf
>
> abcd unix -
Okay, I remember getting caught like this before.
I thought the -d was for 'display' when it means 'defaults' I thought I
was listing the current settings. I quickly read the man page, saw the
word 'Print' and thought "BINGO!!! That's my parameter"
> 07.04.2014 16:34, Timothy D. Legg:
>
>> On
Hi,
I have kept a transport map for the exclusive delivery of abcdmail.com but
its again going along with the regular outbound mails. Please suggest.
#Cat /etc/postfix/transport
abcdmail.com abcd:abcdmail.com
I added the below line in master.cf
abcd unix - - n
I don't see any reason to complicate things by implementing HA solution,
when you can simply have multiple MX records.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Ramesh wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Presently we have primary MX and backup MX servers, when primary goes
down mails will be queued in secondary MX,
Miles Fidelman:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Miles Fidelman:
> >>> Have you considered the following:
> >>>
> >>> - Inbound mail spends a fraction of a second in the queue.
> >>>
> >>> - Inbound mail spends days or weeks or more in the mailbox.
> >>>
> >>> - If an MTA goes down, mail flows via altern
Wietse Venema wrote:
Miles Fidelman:
Have you considered the following:
- Inbound mail spends a fraction of a second in the queue.
- Inbound mail spends days or weeks or more in the mailbox.
- If an MTA goes down, mail flows via alternate MX hosts.
- If the mailbox store goes down, then you
07.04.2014 16:34, Timothy D. Legg:
> On my system, lets say the /etc/hostname is assigned to be 'example'.
> This is not a FQDN, which would require $myhostname to be set as something
> more exact. In my main.cf, I have a line:
>
> myhostname = example.com
>
> but when I run postconf -d myhost
Am 07.04.2014 16:34, schrieb Timothy D. Legg:
> myhostname = example.com
>
> but when I run postconf -d myhostname, I get an output that I didn't expect:
>
> myhostname = example.localdomain
re-read the manual
postconf -d: default settings
postconf -n: current active settings
Hello,
My installation works fine. I am wanting to understand how Postfix works
better so that I can extend my installation's capabilities in the future.
I have Postfix: The Definitive Guide ebook that I bought and downloaded
from O'Reilly and have been using it, as well as the postfix.org websi
On Mon 07/Apr/2014 16:01:44 +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 07.04.2014 15:42, schrieb Richard Laysell:
>> Apr 7 12:52:42 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[1519]: lost connection after
>> AUTH from unknown[78.188.45.153]
>> Apr 7 12:52:42 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[25494]: lost connection after
>> AUTH fr
Am 07.04.2014 15:42, schrieb Richard Laysell:
> Apr 7 12:52:40 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[24765]: lost connection after
> AUTH from unknown[78.188.45.153]
> Apr 7 12:52:41 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[9398]: lost connection after
> AUTH from unknown[78.188.45.153]
> Apr 7 12:52:42 polyphemus postfix
On 4/7/2014 8:42 AM, Richard Laysell wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> What is the best way of dealing with pests like this?
>
> Apr 7 12:52:40 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[24765]: lost connection after
> AUTH from unknown[78.188.45.153]
> Apr 7 12:52:41 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[9398]: lost connection aft
Hello all,
What is the best way of dealing with pests like this?
Apr 7 12:52:40 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[24765]: lost connection after
AUTH from unknown[78.188.45.153]
Apr 7 12:52:41 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[9398]: lost connection after
AUTH from unknown[78.188.45.153]
Apr 7 12:52:42 polyphem
Chris:
> Hi all.
> We have a postfix setup with recipient_bcc_maps and sender_bcc_maps enabled
> for
> each mailbox and delivering to another mta for archiving.
>
> We've maintained the same mailbox namings and added a suffix
> incoming "u...@company.com" bccs to "user-in@company.local"
> outgoin
Hi all.
We have a postfix setup with recipient_bcc_maps and sender_bcc_maps enabled for
each mailbox and delivering to another mta for archiving.
We've maintained the same mailbox namings and added a suffix
incoming "u...@company.com" bccs to "user-in@company.local"
outgoing "u...@company.com" bcc
Miles Fidelman:
> > Have you considered the following:
> >
> > - Inbound mail spends a fraction of a second in the queue.
> >
> > - Inbound mail spends days or weeks or more in the mailbox.
> >
> > - If an MTA goes down, mail flows via alternate MX hosts.
> >
> > - If the mailbox store goes down, t
Good morning Wietse,
I found that this was user error and simply adding "username/" in my vmaps
file worked like a charm.
Additionally, I had to make sure Dovecot could access my mailboxes by
explicitly setting my UID/GID to vmail/vmail in
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf
Thank you for your cont
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:55:49PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is on topic or not. I can't tell whether
> this is mailman issue or a postfix issue.
>
> I have set up mailman.
The simple way to do Postfix and Mailman is to put your lists
subdomain[s] in $mydestination, an
Wietse Venema wrote:
Miles Fidelman:
To find solutions, open your favorite search engine and try "cyrus
mailbox replication", "dovecot meailbox replication", and so on.
I've been wondering about this too, and it strikes me that "mailbox
replication" is only relevant to local delivery. What abo
Miles Fidelman:
> > To find solutions, open your favorite search engine and try "cyrus
> > mailbox replication", "dovecot meailbox replication", and so on.
>
> I've been wondering about this too, and it strikes me that "mailbox
> replication" is only relevant to local delivery. What about replic
On 7/4/2014 8:17 πμ, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
On Linux use DRBD to replicate mail queues between a pair of machines and crm
to control a second Postfix instance that will be started locally to pickup
any remaining mails once the partner machine dies.
Hmm, I think DRBD is only advised in case
23 matches
Mail list logo
