>From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
>On Behalf Of bperrotta
>Sent: Friday, 21 March 2014 11:22 AM
>To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>Subject: No one has responded to either of my posts
>
>I found the answer to my problem.
>Postfix wont mount if you have a b
bperrotta wrote:
I found the answer to my problem.
Postfix wont mount if you have a bad fstab entry
in Suse Linux 12.3. Figured it out from a post
talking about a bad cifs mount in initab in linux forums.
a little disappointed in this mailing list so far.
But dont want to cheese anyone off in cas
21 марта 2014 г. 5:22:24 GMT+04:00, bperrotta wrote
>I found the answer to my problem.
>Postfix wont mount if you have a bad fstab entry
>in Suse Linux 12.3. Figured it out from a post
Wow. Postfix does not mount anything at all, and does not read fstab. However,
if some filesystem on your syste
I found the answer to my problem.
Postfix wont mount if you have a bad fstab entry
in Suse Linux 12.3. Figured it out from a post
talking about a bad cifs mount in initab in linux forums.
a little disappointed in this mailing list so far.
But dont want to cheese anyone off in case I have any
Other
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:36:37PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> > I would leave this at "medium", otherwise you're disabling RC4,
> > which is the best cipher available on older Windows systems
> > (Windows XP)
>
> Windows XP is happy with DES-CBC3-SHA which is not
> that broken as RC4 which
Am 20.03.2014 17:32, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
>> smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/pki/mail/private/hostkey.pem
>> smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = high
>
> I would leave this at "medium", otherwise you're disabling RC4,
> which is the best cipher available on older Windows systems
> (Windows XP)
Windows
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:01:36PM -0400, mizuki wrote:
> IMAP works just fine and they receive emails with no hiccup. Without much
> knowledge of windows mail client softwares, I assume the way windows mail
> clients made to communicate with server is different than other mail
> clients, But I d
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:26:12PM +0530, KK Patnaik wrote:
> I am having issue with my SMTP servers where the mails are taking long time
> before the queue manager.
http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html
> Mar 20 10:43:55 smtp2 postfix/smtp[1
KK Patnaik:
> I am having issue with my SMTP servers where the mails are taking long time
> before the queue manager.
>
> Mar 20 10:43:55 smtp2 postfix/smtp[13548]: 25142124292D: to=,
> relay=aspmx.l.google.com[74.125.142.26]:25, delay=29217,
> delays=29775/1441/0.14/1.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (2
Am 20.03.2014 17:01, schrieb mizuki:
> I'm running Postfix-2.6.6 which is the version coming with latest Redhat6 and
> we have firewall in between the
> public network and campus so we have conduits 465 opened for sending emails
> from outside networks. All mail clients
> work fine except the mai
Hi, I desperately need some help on fixing Windows mail client issues with
Postfix.
I'm running Postfix-2.6.6 which is the version coming with latest Redhat6
and we have firewall in between the public network and campus so we have
conduits 465 opened for sending emails from outside networks. All m
Hi,
I am having issue with my SMTP servers where the mails are taking long time
before the queue manager.
Mar 20 10:43:55 smtp2 postfix/smtp[13548]: 25142124292D: to=,
relay=aspmx.l.google.com[74.125.142.26]:25, delay=29217,
delays=29775/1441/0.14/1.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:23 PM, "li...@rhsoft.net"
wrote:
why do you still post in HTML?
Am 20.03.2014 13:16, schrieb ML mail:
> Sorry my fault, it is working now! I have forgotten to add user
> authentication into my mail client for testing :(
and that is what i said in my first
why do you still post in HTML?
Am 20.03.2014 13:16, schrieb ML mail:
> Sorry my fault, it is working now! I have forgotten to add user
> authentication into my mail client for testing :(
and that is what i said in my first reply:
that is only one log line - where is the evidence that the sender
On , ML mail wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:48 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail wrote:
> Sorry about that.
Here below is the output of a postconf -n:
>
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> biff = no
> config_directory = /etc/post
Am 20.03.2014 13:11, schrieb ML mail:
>> Sorry about that. Here below is the output of a postconf -n:
>>
>> append_dot_mydomain = no
>> biff = no
>> config_directory = /etc/postfix
>> default_transport = smtp
>> inet_interfaces = all
>> inet_protocols = all
>> mailbox_command = procmail -a "$EXTE
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:48 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail wrote:
> Sorry about that. Here below is the output of a postconf -n:
>
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> biff = no
> config_directory = /etc/postfix
> default_transport = smt
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail wrote:
> Sorry about that. Here below is the output of a postconf -n:
>
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> biff = no
> config_directory = /etc/postfix
> default_transport = smtp
> inet_interfaces = all
> inet_protocols = all
> mailbox_command = procmail
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:29 PM, "li...@rhsoft.net"
wrote:
Am 20.03.2014 12:24, schrieb ML mail:
> That's actually the guide I have followed but I thought there must be
> something missing because I alwayse get the
> following Access denied error message:
>
> Mar 20 12:22:38 debian
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail wrote:
> That's actually the guide I have followed but I thought there must be
> something missing because I alwayse get the following Access denied
> error message:
>
>
> Mar 20 12:22:38 debian postfix/submission/smtpd[18467]: NOQUEUE:
> reject:
Am 20.03.2014 12:24, schrieb ML mail:
> That's actually the guide I have followed but I thought there must be
> something missing because I alwayse get the
> following Access denied error message:
>
> Mar 20 12:22:38 debian postfix/submission/smtpd[18467]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from unknown[
That's actually the guide I have followed but I thought there must be something
missing because I alwayse get the following Access denied error message:
Mar 20 12:22:38 debian postfix/submission/smtpd[18467]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[192.168.10.152]: 554 5.7.1 : Client host
rejected:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail wrote:
> Authentication will be done using SASL with type dovecot over a
> dovecot auth service listening on a TCP port on another (mailboxes)
> server.
>
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL
> Is there any guides or best practice
Hi,
I would like to setup a separate postfix server just for mail submission (MSA
on port 587) for the users to be able to send mails. Authentication will be
done using SASL with type dovecot over a dovecot auth service listening on a
TCP port on another (mailboxes) server.
Is there any guides
Pete:
> I'm currently working on getting policyd rate limiting, and outbound
> spam filtering put together, hopefully by the end of the week, but
> in the mean time I'm hoping there is a way to limit sending auth
> sessions to a time limit to help stop the bleeding.
Wietse:
> http://www.postfix.or
Thanks for the reply.
I remove too.gy from mydestination (mydestination = localhost).
This warning disappeared but the problem is still there. :/
On 03/20/2014 02:28 PM, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
There is your hint:
*From:*owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
There is your hint:
Mar 20 09:38:57 ks3100290 postfix/trivial-rewrite[18853]: warning: do not list
domain too.gy in BOTH mydestination and virtual_mailbox_domains
D.
|Ok, here are the postfix logs.
Mar 20 09:38:27 ks3100290 postfix/postfix-script[18843]: starting the Postfix
mail system
Mar 20 09:38:28 ks3100290 postfix/master[18845]: daemon started -- version
2.11.0, configuration /etc/postfix
Mar 20 09:38:57 ks3100290 postfix/smtpd[18849]: connect from
m
28 matches
Mail list logo
