Am 17.03.2014 12:39, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> Fortunately, more and more smtp servers offer STARTTLS.
>> I would like to analyze the certificates used when employing STARTTLS
>> "opportunistically".
there is always the chance to write a script doing tls checks and
perhaps grep log to store resul
On 2014-03-17 Mon 14:46 PM |, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> 20k records may seem like a lot of entries, but it is comparatively
> a tiny Berkeley DB table. You've no reason to care about optimizing
> it.
Thanks.
> If you don't plan incremental updates, I'd like to suggest
> CDB, because the on-dis
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 02:30:32PM +, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> On 2014-03-17 Mon 14:08 PM |, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >
> > > Do btree source files need to be sorted before postmapping?
> >
> > No, but time to insert millions of records may depend on the order
> > of the keys. Do you plan
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:17:01PM +0100, Ralf Hauser wrote:
> > This is not practical. We could optionally log the public key
> > digest of the leaf certificate at a lower log level, or if you
> > really must log the public key digest of each certificate in the
> > chain. What do you actually w
On 2014-03-17 Mon 14:08 PM |, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > Do btree source files need to be sorted before postmapping?
>
> No, but time to insert millions of records may depend on the order
> of the keys. Do you plan to have enormous btree lookup tables?
>
Not this year ~100, maybe eventua
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 02:00:53PM +, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> Do btree source files need to be sorted before postmapping?
>
> [...]
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/17650/
In that thread I pointed out that bulk testing btree *lookup*
performance is best done with lookup k
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 02:00:53PM +, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> Do btree source files need to be sorted before postmapping?
No, but time to insert millions of records may depend on the order
of the keys. Do you plan to have enormous btree lookup tables?
--
Viktor.
Do btree source files need to be sorted before postmapping?
DATABASE_README says about btree: "A sorted, balanced tree structure."
http://www.postfix.org/DATABASE_README.html#types
>From the 8/11 year old archives below, I think:-
With an unsorted source file, postmap produces a "sorted" btree
d
>
> For a more scalable approach, you can use an external policy service
> such as postfwd, or write your own.
All,
I did it with postfwd.
Thank you.
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
> http://www.postfix.org/addon.html#policy
>
> Or use a milter. There are probably existing mi
Hello,
I'm trying to configure postfix to send mail by amazon ses services, I
follow this steps of Amazon Docs, but unsuccessful.
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/DeveloperGuide/postfix.html
The objective is a transactional mail server, so, just a app server can
send mail using this postfix
Sorry
I am using Postfix with Amasvid-new/spam assassin and Dovecot
Over all doing pretty good catching stuff but this is combination is new to
me and the only guides that discuss it seem to be trying to sell
a product
On Mar 15, 2014, at 3:10 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 15/3/2014 8:28
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:39:52PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 17.03.2014 12:36, schrieb Alexandre Ellert:
> > Some of our customers have bad malling practices and I want to limit the
> > max number of Cci recipient.
> > I already use smtpd_recipient_limit but I would like to use a lower
Am 17.03.2014 12:36, schrieb Alexandre Ellert:
> Some of our customers have bad malling practices and I want to limit the max
> number of Cci recipient.
> I already use smtpd_recipient_limit but I would like to use a lower value for
> Cci.
> Do you know how can I achieve this using Postfix?
on
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 05:04:11PM +0100, Ralf Hauser wrote:
> Fortunately, more and more smtp servers offer STARTTLS.
> I would like to analyze the certificates used when employing STARTTLS
> "opportunistically".
What does "analyze" mean? Certificate chains are often multi-kilobyte
objects (at
Hello,
Some of our customers have bad malling practices and I want to limit the max
number of Cci recipient.
I already use smtpd_recipient_limit but I would like to use a lower value for
Cci.
Do you know how can I achieve this using Postfix ?
Thanks.
Alexandre
Oriental Sensation:
smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_milters=inet:smtp:10025
I used to define macros for each milter in main.cf:
dkim_milter = inet:[127.0.0.1]:10025
dmarc_milter = inet:[127.0.0.1]:10026
and use them in master.cf:
smtp inet
Birta,
Thanks for the prompt input. I think the correct way is the following,
though:
smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_milters=inet:smtp:10025
Which basically will apply DKIM signatures but jump over DMARC auth.
This was easy indeed, thanks :)
/
On 17/03/2014 10:32, Oriental Sensation wrote:
Hello group,
I have an issue with Postfix, Dovecot, OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC
cooperating together to achieve the following: Enable me to send Email
from my phone device after authenticating my identity with SASL.
It seems OpenDMARC is not recognizing
Hello group,
I have an issue with Postfix, Dovecot, OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC
cooperating together to achieve the following: Enable me to send Email
from my phone device after authenticating my identity with SASL.
It seems OpenDMARC is not recognizing the IP (obviously an arbitrary
one where my devi
In an older episode, on 2014-03-17 07:22, Thomas Harold wrote:
GMail has the ability where those users could setup GMail to pull from
your POP3 server. There's no need for you to be forwarding mail to a
GMail account. (It's under Settings, Accounts in GMail.)
Note: That means that users woul
lists:
To get a "+", the descriptions says:
"Your system requires authentication (AUTH) on port 587 before the
MAIL FROM command is issued"
that is pure nonsense
+1
you cannot enforce any client to not send any command.
but you can enforce proper answers.
Andreas
21 matches
Mail list logo
