Noel Jones:
> > Cons: you are going to see the routers internal interface on every
> > connection, this configuration discards any filter or rate that you
> > may use based on IP address.
>
> **DANGER**
> Using SNAT is an easy way to make yourself an open relay. One must
> insure that the router's
On 1/10/2014 3:25 PM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> On 1/10/14, 9:18 AM, Andy Rowe wrote:
>>
>> #
>>
> I understand that you want to keep the connection on that belongs to
> each router right?
>
> if so your issue is because you have asymmetric routing and may be
> your firewall is bloc
Alexandre Ellert:
> But I got :
> fatal: bad configuration
> in mail.log
Show the complete logfile record!
Wietse
> I made more tests and greylisting is still a problem.
>
> I've tried with :
> unverified_recipient_tempfail_action = permit
> in main.cf
>
> But I got :
> fatal: bad configuration
> in mail.log
>
> How can I tell Postfix to queue the mail in case of remote reply 4xx ?
>
I answer to myself, i
On 1/10/14, 9:18 AM, Andy Rowe wrote:
Hello:
I have a production mail / web server for a couple very low volume
domains. (CentOS 6.4, apache, postfix) I have a production exchange
server for another small domain. I want to set the CentOS server up to
serve mail to its current clients as wel
> Wietse :
> If the remote SMTP server uses greylisting, then the address
> verification result will be "don't know" (*) and the Postfix SMTP server
> will reply with 4xx (unless you configure Postfix otherwise).
>
> Wietse
> (*) The Postfix SMTP client does not distiunguish between differen
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Lanfeust troy wrote:
> my.host.name.dom
> host.name.dom
> name.dom
> .dom
> u...@my.host.name.dom
>
> Do someone know howto disable this.
>
> thanks
>
>
In our Postfix LDAP configuration, we use the following:
domain = mydomain.com
This seems to restrict the sea
> Wietse :
> If the remote SMTP server uses greylisting, then the address
> verification result will be "don't know" (*) and the Postfix SMTP server
> will reply with 4xx (unless you configure Postfix otherwise).
>
> Wietse
> (*) The Postfix SMTP client does not distiunguish between differe
Alexandre Ellert:
[reject_unverified_recipient]
> Can you confirm that in case of greylisting at the destination
> SMTP, it will work fine ?
If the remote SMTP server uses greylisting, then the address
verification result will be "don't know" (*) and the Postfix SMTP server
will reply with 4xx (un
Hi list,
I have a postfix configured as virtual mailbox, domain no user account
In my openldap.log i have a lotof request
for example if send a mail to postfix via perl script.Postfix create LDAP
request as:
Jan 10 15:16:10 ldap-int-qo slapd[27062]: conn=4031 fd=17 ACCEPT from
IP=IP_postfix:575
> This works like a charm.
>
> One last thing, concerning order of smtpd_recipient_restrictions, I currently
> have this in master.cf :
>
> submission inet n - - - - smtpd
> ...
> -o
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
> Wietse :
> In that case use:
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>...
>check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
>...
>
> /etc/postfix/sender_access:
>x...@example.com reject_unverified_recipient
>example.net reject_unverif
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:33 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: two routers into postfix
>
> On 1/10/2014 9:18 AM, Andy Rowe wrote:
> >
On 1/10/2014 9:18 AM, Andy Rowe wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have a production mail / web server for a couple very low volume
> domains. (CentOS 6.4, apache, postfix) I have a production exchange
> server for another small domain. I want to set the CentOS server up
> to serve mail to its current clients
On 1/10/14, 9:18 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jim?nez:
On 1/9/14, 10:07 PM, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
10.01.2014 3:56 "Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jim?nez"
mailto:are...@ibossmonitor.com>> ???:
Hi Everyone.
Is it posible to validate users before deliver? The thin
Hello:
I have a production mail / web server for a couple very low volume
domains. (CentOS 6.4, apache, postfix) I have a production exchange
server for another small domain. I want to set the CentOS server up to
serve mail to its current clients as well as act as a gateway for
content filtering
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jim?nez:
> On 1/9/14, 10:07 PM, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> >
> >
> > 10.01.2014 3:56 "Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jim?nez"
> > mailto:are...@ibossmonitor.com>> ???:
> > >
> > > Hi Everyone.
> > >
> > > Is it posible to validate users before deliver? The thing is t
On 1/10/2014 7:13 AM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 06:34:24 -0600
> Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> On 1/10/2014 3:48 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>>> On 2014-01-10 Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:15:38 +0100 Kenneth Qvistgaard Dalbjerg wrote:
> I have this
On 1/9/14, 10:07 PM, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
10.01.2014 3:56 пользователь "Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez"
mailto:are...@ibossmonitor.com>> написал:
>
> Hi Everyone.
>
> Is it posible to validate users before deliver? The thing is that we
have 2 email servers (1 exchange and 1 postfix) with d
pgala:
> i have application where user can set sender and recipient. This application
> dosen't have error check. I want set able relay mail for all user settings,
> independent of correctness. For example corect user are:
> user1@domain1 (default user)
> user2@domain2
>
> i want get situation tha
Wijatmoko U. Prayitno:
> $ cat test.pcre
> if !/^To:.*\@customer\.dk$/
> /^From:.*\@ullabulla\.dk$/ REDIRECT myem...@ourdomain.dk
> endif
You get the exact same result without the IF rule.
Wietse
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 06:34:24 -0600
Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/10/2014 3:48 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> > On 2014-01-10 Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote:
> >> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:15:38 +0100 Kenneth Qvistgaard Dalbjerg wrote:
> >>> I have this in my header_checks files:
> >>>
> >>> /^From:.*\@ullabul
i have application where user can set sender and recipient. This application
dosen't have error check. I want set able relay mail for all user settings,
independent of correctness. For example corect user are:
user1@domain1 (default user)
user2@domain2
i want get situation that if user set user3@d
On 1/10/2014 3:48 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2014-01-10 Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:15:38 +0100 Kenneth Qvistgaard Dalbjerg wrote:
>>> I have this in my header_checks files:
>>>
>>> /^From:.*\@ullabulla\.dk/ REDIRECT myem...@ourdomain.dk
>>>
>>> Thats working fi
jvanb:
> I am really sorry to bother you with this question. I am totally new at
> postfix and would really appreciate a little help.
> I have read the manuals and added sender_canonical_maps=n...@example.com to
> my master.cf file and reloaded postfix. But the return-path is still set to
> the sen
Alexandre Ellert:
> > Wietse :
> > You can push the problem back to the webservers, by using the the
> > Postfix SMTP server's "reject_unverified_recipient" feature.
> >
> > With this, Postfix will make one connection for the recipient
> > address, and then the Postfix SMTP server answers with 5XX
Nikolaos Milas:
> Thank you Wietse,
>
> I contacted them and they seem to have adjusted their software so that
> it behaves more "appropriately". No protocol errors any more.
Actually the bug was that they did not wait for the last line
of the 220 greeting, as per my corrected response. That sof
I am really sorry to bother you with this question. I am totally new at
postfix and would really appreciate a little help.
I have read the manuals and added sender_canonical_maps=n...@example.com to
my master.cf file and reloaded postfix. But the return-path is still set to
the sender address.
Can
Thank you Wietse,
I contacted them and they seem to have adjusted their software so that
it behaves more "appropriately". No protocol errors any more.
Best regards,
Nick
On 9/1/2014 2:01 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
They have a buggy SMTP client.
The client is PIPELINING the SMTP commands, but
> Wietse :
> You can push the problem back to the webservers, by using the the
> Postfix SMTP server's "reject_unverified_recipient" feature.
>
> With this, Postfix will make one connection for the recipient
> address, and then the Postfix SMTP server answers with 5XX to the
> web application when
On 2014-01-10 Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:15:38 +0100 Kenneth Qvistgaard Dalbjerg wrote:
>> I have this in my header_checks files:
>>
>> /^From:.*\@ullabulla\.dk/ REDIRECT myem...@ourdomain.dk
>>
>> Thats working fine, but i will like, if mail sent to *@customer.dk
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:15:38 +0100
Kenneth Qvistgaard Dalbjerg wrote:
> I have this in my header_checks files:
>
> /^From:.*\@ullabulla\.dk/ REDIRECT myem...@ourdomain.dk
>
> Thats working fine, but i will like, if mail sent to *@customer.dk is not
> forwarded to my mail address, but inste
Hi
I have this in my header_checks files:
/^From:.*\@ullabulla\.dk/ REDIRECT myem...@ourdomain.dk
Thats working fine, but i will like, if mail sent to *@customer.dk is not
forwarded to my mail address, but instead is sent to the original recipient.
Is that posible to do?
Regards Kenneth D
33 matches
Mail list logo
