Re: Puzzling problem

2014-01-08 Thread Seann
Paul, First thing that caught my eye, is it looks like the reason for the bounce was the filter shell script died: Command died with status 1: "/usr/local/bin/filter.sh". Command output: Jan 9 02:49:28.913 [29829] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.0/32 as it has already been i

Puzzling problem

2014-01-08 Thread Paul Schmehl
I'm working on a website (as a volunteer - www.vvfh.org), and I have a problem sending mail from a web form. Unfortunately, this is on one of those cloud server deals where I have very little access for troubleshooting purposes. I put the files (the script and the contact page) on another ser

Re: transport rule question

2014-01-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:31:37PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Postfix already has a feature that substitutes remote SMTP server > replies (smtp_reply_filter). > > Maybe it's possible to implement a similar substitution for DNS > server responses. If we want to use a regexp-based approach that

Re: transport rule question

2014-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:44:15PM +, Aaron Bennett wrote: > > > Thanks, Wietse. I don't want soft_bounce=yes for everything so > > I'll probably created a dedicated transport for that host. Does > > that seem reasonable? > > You'll also have messages addressed to invalid

Re: transport rule question

2014-01-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:44:15PM +, Aaron Bennett wrote: > Thanks, Wietse. I don't want soft_bounce=yes for everything so > I'll probably created a dedicated transport for that host. Does > that seem reasonable? You'll also have messages addressed to invalid recipients (if any) queued up

Re: transport rule question

2014-01-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:02:17PM +, Aaron Bennett wrote: > For reasons beyond my control, one of the hosts we need to relay > to is occasionally dropping out of dns. We relay to it based on > an ldap map which returns: > > relay:[office365relay.clarku.edu] > > That host is a CNAME for an

Re: transport rule question

2014-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Aaron Bennett: > > Postfix bounces because the DNS server replies that this DNS > > record DOES NOT EXIST. > > > > To work around, use soft_bounce=yes and watch your queue > > carefully for mail piling up. > > Thanks, Wietse. I don't want soft_bounce=yes for everything so > I'll probably created

RE: transport rule question

2014-01-08 Thread Aaron Bennett
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema > Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 4:13 PM > To: Postfix users > Subject: Re: transport rule question > Postfix would defer when it receives no DNS reply. >

Re: transport rule question

2014-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Aaron Bennett: > Hi, > > For reasons beyond my control, one of the hosts we need to relay > to is occasionally dropping out of dns. We relay to it based on > an ldap map which returns: > > relay:[office365relay.clarku.edu] > > That host is a CNAME for an external vendor. It's not hard to guess

Re: canonical maps

2014-01-08 Thread R. Berger
Wietse Venema schreef op 8-1-2014 21:46: R. Berger: R. Berger: It's not exactly a catchall. @domain.nl%1...@otherdomain.nl means that somen...@domain.nl is send to somen...@otherdomain.nl I wrote that you will accept mail for non-existent recipients in otherdomain.nl. That is bad. You

transport rule question

2014-01-08 Thread Aaron Bennett
Hi, For reasons beyond my control, one of the hosts we need to relay to is occasionally dropping out of dns. We relay to it based on an ldap map which returns: relay:[office365relay.clarku.edu] That host is a CNAME for an external vendor. It's not hard to guess which one. When it drops out,

Re: canonical maps

2014-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
R. Berger: > > R. Berger: > >> It's not exactly a catchall. > >> @domain.nl%1...@otherdomain.nl > >> means that somen...@domain.nl is send to somen...@otherdomain.nl > > I wrote that you will accept mail for non-existent recipients in > > otherdomain.nl. > > That is bad. > > Your system wil

Re: canonical maps

2014-01-08 Thread R. Berger
Wietse Venema schreef op 8-1-2014 20:47: R. Berger: It's not exactly a catchall. @domain.nl%1...@otherdomain.nl means that somen...@domain.nl is send to somen...@otherdomain.nl I wrote that you will accept mail for non-existent recipients in otherdomain.nl. That is bad. Your system w

Re: canonical maps

2014-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
R. Berger: > It's not exactly a catchall. > @domain.nl%1...@otherdomain.nl > means that somen...@domain.nl is send to somen...@otherdomain.nl I wrote that you will accept mail for non-existent recipients in otherdomain.nl. That is bad. Your system will be sending backscatter mail to inno

Re: canonical maps

2014-01-08 Thread R. Berger
Wietse Venema schreef op 8-1-2014 20:20: R. Berger: hi, I have the following problem coming from sendmail: This is how it is set up in virtusertable: @domain.nl %1...@otherdomain.nl us...@domain.nl localuser1 us...@domain.nl localuser2 us...@domain.nl localuser3 If you can explai

Re: canonical maps

2014-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
R. Berger: > hi, > > I have the following problem coming from sendmail: > This is how it is set up in virtusertable: > @domain.nl %1...@otherdomain.nl > us...@domain.nl localuser1 > us...@domain.nl localuser2 > us...@domain.nl localuser3 If you can explain what the above means for Se

canonical maps

2014-01-08 Thread R. Berger
hi, I have the following problem coming from sendmail: This is how it is set up in virtusertable: @domain.nl %1...@otherdomain.nl us...@domain.nl localuser1 us...@domain.nl localuser2 us...@domain.nl localuser3 I am using postfixadmin and the local users are working. But how do I fo

Re: relay mail - smtp_generic_maps

2014-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
pgala: > but when i use generic file rewriting is field "mail from" and "recipient". I > want disabled recipient rewriting and rewrite only field "mail from". Is it > possible? > .* wildcard is ok when i use regexp, i tested it. The use case of smtp_generic_maps is to replace all "internal" addres

Re: relay mail - smtp_generic_maps

2014-01-08 Thread pgala
but when i use generic file rewriting is field "mail from" and "recipient". I want disabled recipient rewriting and rewrite only field "mail from". Is it possible? .* wildcard is ok when i use regexp, i tested it. -- View this message in context: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/relay-mail-

Re: relay mail - smtp_generic_maps

2014-01-08 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/8/2014 8:31 AM, pgala wrote: > Hi, > > i want be able to relay mail sent by all of postfix server users. I try do > it by smtp_generic_maps. > My generic file is: > " > /.*/myrelaym...@domain.com > " > > my problem is that rewriting is also recipient addres so the mails is send > to

relay mail - smtp_generic_maps

2014-01-08 Thread pgala
Hi, i want be able to relay mail sent by all of postfix server users. I try do it by smtp_generic_maps. My generic file is: " /.*/myrelaym...@domain.com " my problem is that rewriting is also recipient addres so the mails is send to myrelaym...@domain.com. I know that i can set generic f

Re: postfix-2.11 stable release candidate available

2014-01-08 Thread Andreas Schulze
Zitat von wie...@porcupine.org: Postfix 2.11.0 stable release candidate 1 is uploaded to ftp.porcupine.org and will appear on mirror sites in the next 24 hours. 2.11x is running here on different hosts without problems. Andreas