Hi people, I tried to whitelist certain attachments on postfix and I can't
succeed
I tried to blacklist certain attachments and it worked with:
mime_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/mime_header_checks
Append following line:
/name=[^>]*\.(bat|com|exe|dll|vbs)/ REJECT
I tried this:
Appe
micah:
> I completely agree, however it seems we do not agree with the matching
> names should be. That is precisely why I write this message. The postfix
> parameter names and documentation should adopt the standardized names
> that openssl is changing to. As it is written now, the postfix TLS
We
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 06:31:46PM -0500, micah wrote:
>
>> > Given cipherlist class names:
>> >
>> >kEECDH - cipher suites that support Ephemeral ECDH key exchange
>> >kEDH- cipher suites that support Ephemeral DH key exchange
>>
>> I'm sorry, but I have n
Maybe if you explain a little more about what your goal is someone
can offer some advice.
On 1/5/2014 2:47 PM, portos_latinos wrote:
> It seems That ! Doesn t work
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Whitelisting-certain-attachments-on-postfix-t
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 06:31:46PM -0500, micah wrote:
> > Given cipherlist class names:
> >
> > kEECDH - cipher suites that support Ephemeral ECDH key exchange
> > kEDH- cipher suites that support Ephemeral DH key exchange
>
> I'm sorry, but I have no idea what "cipherlist class nam
Hi Viktor,
Thanks for the reply.
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 06:03:40PM -0500, micah wrote:
>
>> I notice that you are using OpenSSL's private terminology (EDH and
>> EECDH) instead of the standard terminology (DHE and ECDHE).
>
> Given cipherlist class names:
>
> k
Postfix 2.11.0 stable release candidate 1 is uploaded to ftp.porcupine.org
and will appear on mirror sites in the next 24 hours.
Below is a copy of the RELEASE_NOTES file. I expect to finalize
Postfix 2.11.0 before the end of this month.
It was unfortunately not possible to support LMDB with thi
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 01:58:30PM +0100, Andreas Schulze wrote:
> the documentation to these parameters refers the NSA website.
> However the links are broken.
That's the trouble with links. Anyone have suggested replacements.
> Also I don't feel very comfortable these days if postfix uses cry
It seems That ! Doesn t work
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Whitelisting-certain-attachments-on-postfix-tp63436p64125.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 05.01.2014 16:22, schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
> to be honest: somebody saying "i do not trust this and that" does
> not interest me as long there is nothing he can show to prove his
> feelings - i am IT specialist and not a priest believing in things
good point, i agree in this !
any comments to
On 2014-01-05 10:42 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
That output above was the result of postconf -Mf
Sorry, in my original email I did say -M, but I meant -Mf
On 2014-01-05 10:17 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
wrote:
Charles Marcus:
I just noticed this and wanted to make sure this is the way it is
supposed to show.
When I do postconf -M, the output shows:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o syslog_name=postfi
Am 05.01.2014 14:40, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
> On 2014-01-05 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>> Am 05.01.2014 13:58, schrieb Andreas Schulze:
>>> the documentation to these parameters refers the NSA website. However
>>> the links are broken. Also I don't feel very comfortable these days
>>> if postfix us
Charles Marcus:
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed this and wanted to make sure this is the way it is
> supposed to show.
>
> When I do postconf -M, the output shows:
>
> > submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> > -o syslog_name=postfix-587 -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
Hello,
I just noticed this and wanted to make sure this is the way it is
supposed to show.
When I do postconf -M, the output shows:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o syslog_name=postfix-587 -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes
-
On 5/01/2014 11:58 PM, Andreas Schulze wrote:
Hello,
the documentation to these parameters refers the NSA website. However
the links are broken.
Also I don't feel very comfortable these days if postfix uses crypto
approved by NSA :-/
Andreas
I don't feel comfortable with the NSA in general,
On 2014-01-05 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 05.01.2014 13:58, schrieb Andreas Schulze:
>> the documentation to these parameters refers the NSA website. However
>> the links are broken. Also I don't feel very comfortable these days
>> if postfix uses crypto approved by NSA :-/
>
> backed by more tha
Am 05.01.2014 13:58, schrieb Andreas Schulze:
> the documentation to these parameters refers the NSA website. However the
> links are broken.
> Also I don't feel very comfortable these days if postfix uses crypto approved
> by NSA :-/
backed by more than FUD?
people tend to forget that the NSA
Hello,
the documentation to these parameters refers the NSA website. However
the links are broken.
Also I don't feel very comfortable these days if postfix uses crypto
approved by NSA :-/
Andreas
19 matches
Mail list logo
