Wietse:
> This transformation would be needed only when sending mail between
> systems that don't support non-ASCII addresses. Just like MIME
> 8-7bit conversion, the need for it goes away over time.
Viktor Dukhovni:
> There would be a benefit to long-term Punycode localpart addresses.
I don't th
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 07:10:26AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > IMHO Extending punycode to local part may be a good option for "mostly
> > ASCII" charsets (ISO-8859-X) but it may create (too) long names for
> > "completely non ASCII charsets".
Punycode is a rather efficient encoding. There is
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:08:30PM +0100, sca wrote:
> I find posttls-finger very useful. But it isn't installed by default.
> Do I need some special parameters to install binary+manpage when
> building postfix from source?
> (2.11-$latest)
Add the relevant entries to conf/postfix-files.
--
Andreas Kasenides:
> Come to think of it, why don't we go back to using inches, yards,
> miles and pounds? It was, and still is, quite painful converting
> to SI.
If there is no migration path that allows different systems to
interoperate while the transition is being made, then real people
will
Andrzej A. Filip:
> On 12/30/2013 04:55 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:09:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> >> Indeed. SMTPUTF8 support involves more than the 1% that says "I can
> >> do SMTPUTF8" in the EHLO handshake. There is a whole list of RFCs
> >> that need t
Hello,
I find posttls-finger very useful. But it isn't installed by default.
Do I need some special parameters to install binary+manpage when
building postfix from source?
(2.11-$latest)
Andreas
On 29-12-2013 22:05, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Freek Dijkstra :
Hi all,
Postfix does not support international email addresses, such as
josé@example.org, as described by RFC 6530-6532. To be precise, the
SMPTUTF8 (previously: UTF8SMTP) SMTP extension is not announced in the
EHLO re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Viktor Dukhovni said the following on 30/12/2013 04:55:
>> Indeed. SMTPUTF8 support involves more than the 1% that says "I can do
>> SMTPUTF8" in the EHLO handshake. There is a whole list of RFCs that need
>> to be supported first.
>
> I think the RF
On 12/30/2013 04:55 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:09:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Indeed. SMTPUTF8 support involves more than the 1% that says "I can
>> do SMTPUTF8" in the EHLO handshake. There is a whole list of RFCs
>> that need to be supported first.
>
> I t
