On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:04:15AM -0500, John Allen wrote:
> > The main difficulty with server-side DANE is that your zone
> > must be DNSSEC signed. Deployment of DNSSEC is still fairly thin.
> > With a bit of luck DANE might motivate folks to consider DNSSEC.
>
> My interest in TLS
On 13/12/2013 3:50 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:11:38PM -0500, John Allen wrote:
Does anybody know of a good,but simple write up on DANE and TLSA.
It has to be simple enough for me to understand (assume idiot).
An explanation of what DANE TLSA is for[*]?
Or how to set
Am 14.12.2013 00:18, schrieb Adam Moffett:
> We're doing sender verification for our local domains, so a message sent from
> "f...@plexicomm.net" gets rejected.
> A message with an envelope sender of "va...@spammer.com" with a from: header
> of "f...@plexicomm.net" gets
> accepted. Is there a w
We're doing sender verification for our local domains, so a message sent
from "f...@plexicomm.net" gets rejected. A message with an envelope
sender of "va...@spammer.com" with a from: header of
"f...@plexicomm.net" gets accepted. Is there a way to enable
verification on "from:" header address
>
>
> Quite possibly it is, see:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/DATABASE_README.html#safe_db
>
> The best solution is to use CDB, rather than Berkeley DB for these,
> if your Postfix package supports CDB, use it. CDB performs updates
> atomically and uses less memory, ... If switching to CDB
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:11:38PM -0500, John Allen wrote:
> Does anybody know of a good,but simple write up on DANE and TLSA.
> It has to be simple enough for me to understand (assume idiot).
An explanation of what DANE TLSA is for[*]?
Or how to set up a Postfix to work with it?
If the latter
Does anybody know of a good,but simple write up on DANE and TLSA.
It has to be simple enough for me to understand (assume idiot).
John A
On 12/13/2013 5:55 AM, E.B. wrote:
> Is there anywhere to find a list of the tables used by
> a process like trivial-rewrite?
>
Each postfix man page lists relevant configuration parameters,
including parameters that accept tables.
http://www.postfix.org/trivial-rewrite.8.html
http://www.postfi
> On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 6:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:18:09PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> > I read somewhere on this list that it's not necessary to use
> proxymap
>> > for transport table lookups.
>>
>> It is undesirable with the current a
No. You won't need split DNS unless Postfix(with private IP) is delevering
mails to other internal MTA(with private IP) for which MX records points to
public IP.
And from the perspective of Postfix split DNS is nothing but a DNS server
running with customized DNS zones on internal network.
On Thu
10 matches
Mail list logo
