Re: postfix 2.9.x and smtpd_recipient_restrictions in the main.cf and master.cf

2013-11-11 Thread Wijatmoko U. Prayitno
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:55:57 +0100 Josef Karliak wrote: >But postfix complains for everything after "check_recipient_access > hash:/etc/postfix/alias_list". Maybe he do not like space char. So there is a > question - how do you solve it on your postfix ? >And why I want it ? I want to a

postfix 2.9.x and smtpd_recipient_restrictions in the main.cf and master.cf

2013-11-11 Thread Josef Karliak
Good morning, I ve a firewall with 3 network card - WAN, LAN and DMZ. I want to have diferend smtpd_recipient_restrictions on the WAN card, so I've set it in the master.cf 193.11.123.9:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_

Re: Catch-all virtual alias

2013-11-11 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2013-11-11 2:30 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: It is not entirely unreasonable to expect address validation to handle 1-to-1 aliasing of @example.org with @example.net. Postfixadmin, an excellent tool for managing userdbs in mysql/postgresql, has had 1-to-1 domain aliasing for a long time, and

Re: postfix 2.7.1 debian - does not query DNS

2013-11-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, November 11, 2013 20:41:05 Hans Spaans wrote: > Stan Hoeppner schreef op 2013-11-09 04:22: > > On 11/8/2013 4:05 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > >> there are only rare situations where a chrooted postfix > >> makes sense and so they should not making a problematic > >> default which gains

Re: postfix 2.7.1 debian - does not query DNS

2013-11-11 Thread Hans Spaans
Stan Hoeppner schreef op 2013-11-09 04:22: On 11/8/2013 4:05 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: there are only rare situations where a chrooted postfix makes sense and so they should not making a problematic default which gains nothing on 999 out of 1000 setups The reason for chrooting Postfix is du

Re: Catch-all virtual alias

2013-11-11 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 07:18:01PM +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: > > I consider this a bug, not a feature. Neither the manual for > > virtual_mailbox_maps nor the one for virtual_alias_maps says that the > > restriction from virtual_mailbox_maps is being ignored if there is a > > valid virtual_ali

Re: Temporary lookup failure with ldap

2013-11-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Merve Temizer: > If i do not need why i am getting "Temporary lookup failure" for every > attempt while i was sending mail through telnet? Wietse > The reason for the failure is in the MAILLOG file. Postfix does > not provide configuration error details to SMTP clients. Merve Temizer: > i change

Re: Catch-all virtual alias

2013-11-11 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2013-11-11 Christoph Kling wrote: >> User mappings, including catch-alls, should go into the respective >> map. In case of virtual mailboxes you must map the catch-all to an >> existing mailbox in $virtual_mailbox_maps, e.g.: >> >> f...@example.net example.net/foo >> b...@example.net example.

RE: Catch-all virtual alias

2013-11-11 Thread Christoph Kling
Dear Ansgar and everybody else, in short: I think postfix' behavior reflects a bug, not a feature. Please, read again my first email. I hope to make it clear with the following remarks: > $virtual_mailbox_domains lists *domains*, so its content should look like > this: > > example.net I am sor

Re: case-related milter bug

2013-11-11 Thread moparisthebest
That was the ticket, I changed python-libmilter to get the RCPT TO from the R<> part instead of the {rcpt_addr} macro and postfix now deletes the recipient correctly now that the correct case is sent back: https://github.com/crustymonkey/python-libmilter/pull/2 I also noticed that postfix's {rcpt_

Re: AOL won't even talk to me

2013-11-11 Thread LunarZone
IP reputation can be a difficult issue, especially in the first couple months. Can you telnet to: mailin-01.mx.aol.com 25 ? (That will give you some indication) How is your SPF Record ?

Re: Temporary lookup failure with ldap

2013-11-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Merve Temizer: > If i do not need why i am getting "Temporary lookup failure" for every > attempt while i was sending mail through telnet? The reason for the failure is in the MAILLOG file. Postfix does not provide configuration error details to SMTP clients. Wietse

Temporary lookup failure with ldap

2013-11-11 Thread Merve Temizer
Hello, Below lines are from: http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html Upon receiving mail for a local address "ldapuser" that isn't found in the /etc/aliases database, Postfix will search the LDAP server listening at port 389 on ldap.exam- ple.com. It will bind anonymously, search for any direc