Andy Howell skrev den 2013-10-30 22:42:
I'm using openSuSE 13.1 system,
http://www.opensuse.org/ its still first released in now 19 days, so how
did you get it ? :)
Andy Howell:
> I should probably just disable ipv6 on the interfaces, as its not needed.
>
> In main.cf, I have inet_interfaces = all. The only place I see a ipv6 address
> in in
> mydestination. I added that while troubleshooting.
>
> mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost,
Am 30.10.2013 22:42, schrieb Andy Howell:
> I'm using openSuSE 13.1 system, running as a virtual machine. I'm not married
> to that
> disto. I started with CentOS 6.4, but the postfix there is 3+ years old. I
> wanted an RPM
> based disto with more recent versions. SuSE 13.1 seemed reasonable. I
On 10/30/2013 02:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andy Howell:
>> I was using telnet on the host to test it out, ie
>>
>> telnet localhost 10025
>>
>> That is resolving localhost to ::1. Doing:
>>
>> telnet 127.0.0.1 10025
>>
>> works fine.
>
> Not to criticize you in particular, but why was IPv6 ena
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:48:44PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> How would postscreen know that the client makes no mistakes
> over the duration of the entire SMTP session?
Oh, of course. I guess a zombie still might proceed with DATA, or any
other number of errors. Seems to be a bug with the cli
Erik Gr?tnes:
> If I understand correct, I need to let all servers that should be
> able to send mail out be part of mynetworks. Is that correct? The
> problem is that when the servers are part of mynetworks, all the
> throttling and antispam check stops - it is just trusted...
>
> I would like to
Hi.
I work together with Rune, and will try to describe what we want to achieve:
We want the throttling and spamhaus lookup to be forced for all email except a
few servers.
Our environment consists of several mailservers.
We have a postfix server that is used for relaying email and doing an initi
/dev/rob0:
> A non-whitelisted client which hit both primary MX (.211) and
> secondary (.214) in proper sequence is getting deferred by
> postscreen, both times.
>
> Oct 30 20:30:16 harrier postfix/postscreen[551]: CONNECT from
> [216.150.190.51]:35507 to [207.223.116.211]:25
> Oct 30 20:30:22
A non-whitelisted client which hit both primary MX (.211) and
secondary (.214) in proper sequence is getting deferred by
postscreen, both times.
Oct 30 20:30:16 harrier postfix/postscreen[551]: CONNECT from
[216.150.190.51]:35507 to [207.223.116.211]:25
Oct 30 20:30:22 harrier postfix/tlsproxy[
Andy Howell:
> I was using telnet on the host to test it out, ie
>
> telnet localhost 10025
>
> That is resolving localhost to ::1. Doing:
>
> telnet 127.0.0.1 10025
>
> works fine.
Not to criticize you in particular, but why was IPv6 enabled in
main.cf? Is this a mis-feature of your Linux dis
On 10/29/2013 11:29 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:21:06PM -0500, Andy Howell wrote:
>> I'm trying to setup amavis. I can't connect from postfix on port
>> 10025, configured as:
>>
>> localhost:10025 inet n-n--smtpd -vv
>
> Make that 127.0.0.1:10025, and d
David Schraeder:
> Hi,
>
> I was wanting to know if anybody has done any header rewrite for a
> content type. I am looking to work around and exchange bug where people
> on exchange are sending calendar invites and they are set as
> multipart/alternative. They do not show up in our clients(thund
is there any book which contains all the postfix features and third party
components like roundcube, ldap,dovecot mysql, spamfilter etc"
Thanks,
Myk
Rudy Gevaert:
> On 10/29/2013 01:11 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I have a patch that should also work with other Postfix releases at
> > ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20131028-check-sasl-access-patch
>
> I saw there was a newer one
> ftp://ftp.porcu
On 10/29/2013 01:11 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
.
I have a patch that should also work with other Postfix releases at
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20131028-check-sasl-access-patch
I saw there was a newer one
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix
Hi,
I was wanting to know if anybody has done any header rewrite for a
content type. I am looking to work around and exchange bug where people
on exchange are sending calendar invites and they are set as
multipart/alternative. They do not show up in our clients(thunderbird,
roundcube, outlook ex
Roman Gelfand:
> Looking at the tcp stream, below, of a smtp conversation, it appears
> there is 5 second delay before the actual smtp conversation begins.
> Is this normal behavior. If not, any ideas what/where specifically,
> in networking, I should be troubleshooting? No change was done to the
On 10/30/2013 3:11 AM, Rune Elvemo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We are implementing postfix as “front mail servers”. Their job will
> be to relay email to our inside servers, and be the “smart host” for
> all internal servers.
>
> I thought that as long a domain was registered as a relay-domain,
> postfix wo
Looking at the tcp stream, below, of a smtp conversation, it appears
there is 5 second delay before the actual smtp conversation begins.
Is this normal behavior. If not, any ideas what/where specifically,
in networking, I should be troubleshooting? No change was done to the
server or any other ma
Andy Howell skrev den 2013-10-30 04:21:
-o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8
Any idea why localhost is not matching?
smtp is trying connect from ipv6, but your networks is just ipv4
restricted
multiple ways of solving :)
Christophe Denuzi?re - Sutunam:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to have all mail sent via pickup (php, command line, ...) to
> be send throught another postfix instance.
> This instance act as a relay to the first instance. The idea is to apply
> policies on these mails.
>
> I've setuped multipostfix inst
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:16:41AM +, Ed W wrote:
> Hi, I would like to experiment with disallowing smtp connections
> from setting up tls from certain IP addresses, whilst allowing all
> other connections to do as they please. Any thoughts on how I could
> configure this please?
http://w
Hi, I would like to experiment with disallowing smtp connections from
setting up tls from certain IP addresses, whilst allowing all other
connections to do as they please. Any thoughts on how I could configure
this please?
Someone will likely ask why, so for completeness: Sure, right now
ever
Hi,
I would like to have all mail sent via pickup (php, command line, ...) to
be send throught another postfix instance.
This instance act as a relay to the first instance. The idea is to apply
policies on these mails.
I've setuped multipostfix instance and both work like a charm.
Now I try witho
Hi.
We are implementing postfix as “front mail servers”. Their job will be
to relay email to our inside servers, and be the “smart host” for all
internal servers.
I thought that as long a domain was registered as a relay-domain,
postfix would send emails both ways for this domain. But I disc
25 matches
Mail list logo
