Hi, after configure Viktor Dukhovnis workaround
like
http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=137824308215202&w=2
...
openssl dhparam -out dh2048.pem 2048
# postconf -e 'smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file =
${config_directory}/dh2048.pem'
...
i had some report from one customer with netscape 7 ( very
On 9/6/2013 11:06 PM, Vishal Agarwal wrote:
> Hi,
> Kindly advise how I can set my SMTP port to 465 TLS instead of 25 ?
Is this what you're looking for?
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_smtps
If not, please be more specific of your needs.
-- Noel Jones
Hi,
Kindly advise how I can set my SMTP port to 465 TLS instead of 25 ?
Regards,
Vishal Agarwal
Just a thought, In order to block more incoming spam you could add more rbl's
to your main.cf file.
I have spamassassin, but it's turned off in favor of the following smtpd
restrictions and domain blocking
in the plesk user interface, or filtering in the Cpanel interface. I have 2
servers which bot
LuKreme:
> Over the last decade all the mail users (well, all but me) are no
> longer willing to use ssh to login to a terminal session and do
> things like edit a .procmailrc, but many of them still want server
> side filtering.
>
> I have +addressing setup, so that helps some, though it is still
Over the last decade all the mail users (well, all but me) are no longer
willing to use ssh to login to a terminal session and do things like edit a
.procmailrc, but many of them still want server side filtering.
I have +addressing setup, so that helps some, though it is still beyond the
abilit
Hi, I'm using postfix 2.9.6 on opensuse12.3. I managed to migrate from
an older version of Postfix ( Debian 5.0 ) the last couple of days. One
thing that I haven't been able to do is restrict outgoing mail to an
entire subdomain only, say for delivering mail only inside the country.
I'm usin
On 9/6/2013 9:05 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wijatmoko U. Prayitno:
>> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:43:27 +0300
>> wiseadmin wrote:
>>
>>> and the same message from postfix logs:
>>>
>>> /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]: A3E8C10BADF:
>>> uid=1018 from=
>> The email came from
All emails are reveived through smtp and then they are passed to
spamd, inspected and delivered.
If I say something stupid, please excuse me, I am experienced with
linux and networking in general bun not to postfix and email
servers.
I sent an email to myself and
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
>>> /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]: A3E8C10BADF:
>>> uid=1018 from=
>> The email came from local user uid 1018 (service pickup).
>
> Good observation. This message did not come via
I installed SA last week and I started to reveive these spams 1-2 months
ago.
# netstat -tupan | grep spam
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:783 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
27752/spamd.pid
What tests should I do next?
This is a production server, I'am starting to become afraid.
What was t
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 21:10 +0700, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
>
> >>> /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]:
> >>> A3E8C10BADF: uid=1018 from=
> >> The email came from local user uid
Wijatmoko U. Prayitno:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:43:27 +0300
> wiseadmin wrote:
>
> > and the same message from postfix logs:
> >
> > /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]: A3E8C10BADF:
> > uid=1018 from=
> The email came from local user uid 1018 (service pickup).
Good o
* LuKreme :
> On 05 Sep 2013, at 23:51 , Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > main.cf, master.cf, dynamicmaps.cf
> >root:postfix 644
> >Must be world readable for sendmail users
>
> do you mean actual real sendmail (we don't have that) or postfix's sendmail
> compatible interface?
I m
Ok, this is a solution. I tried to avoid this because it consumes some
resources.
I have problems ONLY with this specific spam.
I try to find out if there is something like this:
- reject all emails that come from a different server to my server and
have the From: header a local address (on my
And what does it mean?
uid 1018 is the user under witch spamd runs.
#grep 1018 /etc/passwd
spamd:x:1018:1019::/home/spamd:/bin/bash
I don't know how to interpret the fact that is comes from pickup
service. Is my server compromised?
Thanks.
On 09/06/2013 04:51 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno wrote
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:43:27 +0300
wiseadmin wrote:
> and the same message from postfix logs:
>
> /var/log/mail.log.1:Sep 5 17:10:06 cma postfix/pickup[17510]: A3E8C10BADF:
> uid=1018 from=
The email came from local user uid 1018 (service pickup).
--
WUP
wiseadmin:
> I have a postfix server for
> many years. The anti-spam filters were ok, I got in general just a
> couple of spams per day.
>
> Since a month or so, I start getting
> more than 100 spams for every user on a specific account/domain
> per
>
Hello,
I have a postfix server for
many years. The anti-spam filters were ok, I got in general just a
couple of spams per day.
Since a month or so, I start getting
more than 100 spams for every user on a specific account/domain
per
da
On 05 Sep 2013, at 23:51 , Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> main.cf, master.cf, dynamicmaps.cf
>root:postfix 644
>Must be world readable for sendmail users
do you mean actual real sendmail (we don't have that) or postfix's sendmail
compatible interface?
> I use a Makefile to maintai
On Sep 6, 2013, at 04:39, LuKreme wrote:
> All the files in /etc/postfix are 1) owned by root and 2) marked with 644
> permissions.
>
> I'm not sure this is a good idea (though there are no other users who login
> to the shell, there are other users who at least in theory could).
>
> I did ch
21 matches
Mail list logo
