Re: postfix+ejabberd

2013-07-03 Thread btb
On Jul 3, 2013, at 16.31, Dejan Doder wrote: > Hi group , > sorry because I have general question > Did anyone have experience with integration posfix and ejabberd ? integration how? what is your goal?

postfix+ejabberd

2013-07-03 Thread Dejan Doder
Hi group , sorry because I have general question Did anyone have experience with integration posfix and ejabberd ? BR Dejan

Re: postfix rejecting valid mail server

2013-07-03 Thread Téssio Fechine
The problem was a broken /etc/apt/sources.list in debian. Someone changed one of the repositories to wheezy, and left the others as squeeze. A broken package dependency made the postfix resolver stop working, apparently. After the system was fully upgraded to wheezy, postfix started working as expe

Re: Virtual aliases pointing to non-existent virtual mailboxes

2013-07-03 Thread Axel Luttgens
Le 3 juil. 2013 à 16:23, Wietse Venema a écrit : > [...] > > If you want immediate verification, use reject_unverified_recipient. > This does a lot of work behind the scenes and then caches the result. > http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient > > Having Postfix do full

Re: Virtual aliases pointing to non-existent virtual mailboxes

2013-07-03 Thread Wietse Venema
Axel Luttgens: > 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown > in virtual mailbox table > > On the other hand, typing: > > rcpt to: > > allows to go ahead and the message will be queued, then bounced > because the LMTP service ultimately rejects the target address > . > > S

Virtual aliases pointing to non-existent virtual mailboxes

2013-07-03 Thread Axel Luttgens
Hello, Let's consider following config (presentation based on VIRTUAL_README): /etc/postfix/main.cf : virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/path/name virtual_mailbox_domains = example.com virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox

Re: Postscreen temporary blacklisting

2013-07-03 Thread Wietse Venema
v.dimit...@synergetic.ag: > Hi All, > > I understand that maintaining a (small) temporary whitelisting is > more appropriate way, but still for me also make sence to have a > temporary blacklisting maintained the same way postscreen temporary > whitelisting does. Can you use rbldnsd or memcached?

Re: multiple auth methods for smtpd

2013-07-03 Thread LuKreme
On 03 Jul 2013, at 01:29 , "Bart J. Smit" wrote: > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ram > Sent: 03 July 2013 05:44 > To: Postfix users > Subject: multiple auth methods for smtpd > > Is it possible to use 2 different methods of authen

Postscreen temporary blacklisting

2013-07-03 Thread V.Dimitrov
Hi All, I understand that maintaining a (small) temporary whitelisting is more appropriate way, but still for me also make sence to have a temporary blacklisting maintained the same way postscreen temporary whitelisting does. Is it possible to provide a command line tool, which trough proxymap

RE: multiple auth methods for smtpd

2013-07-03 Thread Bart J. Smit
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ram Sent: 03 July 2013 05:44 To: Postfix users Subject: multiple auth methods for smtpd Is it possible to use 2 different methods of authentication on smtpd based on userids Some users authentication aga