Re: "generic_maps" problem

awingnut: > Thanks. I was hoping qmgr was after smtp so that really tells me nothing > then. I don't see any thing in the log with the string > otheraddr...@mydomain.com. I followed the instructions for generic > mapping but it seems to not be working. Mail is being refused by my ISP > because it i

Re: "generic_maps" problem

On 4/13/2013 6:45 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > awingnut: >> I having some trouble debugging a generic_maps problem. My master.conf >> contains this: >> >> smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic >> >> /etc/postfix/generic contains this (sanitized): >> >> myaddr...@mydomain.comothera

Re: "generic_maps" problem

awingnut: > I having some trouble debugging a generic_maps problem. My master.conf > contains this: > > smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic > > /etc/postfix/generic contains this (sanitized): > > myaddr...@mydomain.comotheraddr...@mydomain.com As documented, this is a Post

Re: Another sanity check request

On Apr 13, 2013, at 17.10, Russell Jones wrote: > > On 4/13/2013 3:44 PM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: >> you offer no service whatsoever on port 25? postfix is not listening on >> that port? if that's truly the case, then, to be pedantic, you're running >> an msa, not an mta, in which case you

"generic_maps" problem

I having some trouble debugging a generic_maps problem. My master.conf contains this: smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic /etc/postfix/generic contains this (sanitized): myaddr...@mydomain.comotheraddr...@mydomain.com In the log, when I send email from myaddr...@mydomain.c

Re: Another sanity check request

On 4/13/2013 3:44 PM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: you offer no service whatsoever on port 25? postfix is not listening on that port? if that's truly the case, then, to be pedantic, you're running an msa, not an mta, in which case you could argue that is an exception to the rule, and such global

Re: Another sanity check request

On Apr 13, 2013, at 16.40, Reindl Harald wrote: > > that your "discourage use of permit_mynetworks" is far from reality as > also "do not use SASAL and submission on port 25" as well if someone > asks for ANOTHER sanity check after upgrade to a new version? i'm not sure why it seems to be so ha

Re: Another sanity check request

On Apr 13, 2013, at 16.03, Russell Jones wrote: > > really, neither of permit_mynetworks nor permit_sasl_authenticated belong > > in any global restrictions. > smtp auth [e.g sasl] is for submission clients, which should be using > submission/587, and these days, > > > This is contrary to w

Re: Another sanity check request

Am 13.04.2013 22:36, schrieb b...@bitrate.net: >> fine - in the real life you start not from scratch > > in the real world, both [and more] things happen. and "another" in the subject is a clear sign >> have fun calling hundrets and thousands of users especially with broken >> clients like a i

Re: Another sanity check request

On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.48, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 13.04.2013 21:42, schrieb b...@bitrate.net: >> >> On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.33, Russell Jones wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity >>> check to ensure my (fairly simple)

Re: Another sanity check request

On 4/13/2013 2:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: i would ALWAYS include "reject_unauth_destination" BEFORE "check_client_access" here Thanks Reindl! It was before, however I read on the Postfix docs that reject_unauth_destination is no longer necessary in the recipient_restrictions section, hen

Re: Another sanity check request

Am 13.04.2013 21:42, schrieb b...@bitrate.net: > > On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.33, Russell Jones wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity >> check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup is sane with the new >> smtpd_relay_restrictions? Th

Re: Another sanity check request

On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.33, Russell Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity > check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup is sane with the new > smtpd_relay_restrictions? Thanks :-) > > smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks

Re: Another sanity check request

Am 13.04.2013 21:33, schrieb Russell Jones: > Hi all, > > Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity > check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup > is sane with the new smtpd_relay_restrictions? Thanks :-) if your setup was safe before it is now also and with

Another sanity check request

Hi all, Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup is sane with the new smtpd_relay_restrictions? Thanks :-) smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated reject_unauth_destination smtpd_rec

Re: SMTPS 465

Le 13/04/2013 13:40, mouss a écrit : > Le 12/04/2013 23:05, Joan Moreau a écrit : > Please don't top-post. I do not understand smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1 is > sufficient for debugging. ok 2013-04-12T21:49:03.160443+02:00 server > postfix/smtpd[12238]: warning: TLS library problem: 12238:error:140

Re: SMTPS 465

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 03:40:59PM +0200, mouss wrote: > >> 2013-04-12T21:49:03.160443+02:00 server postfix/smtpd[12238]: > >> warning: TLS library problem: 12238:error:1409D08A:SSL > >> routines:ssl3_setup_key_block:cipher or hash unavailable:s3_enc.c:423: > >> > >> This suggests your TLS library

Sending mail with specific address in own domain to relay.

Hi. The situation is as follows: I get all my mail to my domain to the web hotel where I've registered the domain. I fetch my mail using Fetchmail and deliver it to my server running Dovecot + Postfix. Outgoing mail is relayed to my ISP. The problem is that my wife has an email account at my we

New Postfix log analyzer tool V0.9.11 released (PostgreSQL DB 9.2.x based)

Dear Community, I just released *version 0.9.11* of the tool. This version is the *first one to include Microsoft Exchange Server Logs parsing capabilities*. README including versionning info as well as archive are available there: https://sourceforge.net/projects/x-itools/files/X-Itools%20r

Re: postfix and Berkeley DB

On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 05:10:09 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > ... > In our previous episode (Thursday, 11-Apr-2013), Sahil Tandon said: > > As documented, Postfix uses the default Berkeley DB version that ships > > with your system, which I am assuming is FreeBSD. > > Yes, FreeBSD VeryOld-stable. > >

Re: Serving Dovecot mailbox quota status to Postfix

* Titanus Eramius : > Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:27:26 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt : > > > * Titanus Eramius : > > > > > Very useful, thank you for writing and sharing. May I suggest the > > > english Wiki-article for background on backscatter? > > > > URL? > > > > Sorry, off course > http://en.wiki

Re: New Postfix log analyzer tool, statistics, grapher, ... PostgreSQL DB 9.2.x based

Le 13/04/2013 15:17, /dev/rob0 a écrit : I think the point is that none of the software you mention are Linux-specific. Postfix, PostgreSQL, rsyslog, "apache" (Apache httpd), and php all work and are commonly seen on other Unix and Unix-like systems. It doesn't sound likely that you have done s

Re: SMTPS 465

Le 12/04/2013 23:05, Joan Moreau a écrit : > >> Please don't top-post. > > I do not understand > > >> smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1 is sufficient for debugging. > > ok > > >> 2013-04-12T21:49:03.160443+02:00 server postfix/smtpd[12238]: >> warning: TLS library problem: 12238:error:1409D08A:SSL >> routines

Re: New Postfix log analyzer tool, statistics, grapher, ... PostgreSQL DB 9.2.x based

On Apr 13, 2013, at 8:17 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > I think the point is that none of the software you mention are > Linux-specific. Postfix, PostgreSQL, rsyslog, "apache" (Apache > httpd), and php all work and are commonly seen on other Unix and > Unix-like systems. It doesn't sound likely th

Re: New Postfix log analyzer tool, statistics, grapher, ... PostgreSQL DB 9.2.x based

[ Top-posting fixed ] > Le 13/04/2013 11:31, LuKreme a écrit : > >On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:29, Nicolas HAHN wrote: > >>a Linux server > >It requires Linux? Why would it require Linux? On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:38:07AM +0200, Nicolas HAHN wrote: > Mmhhh... What can I say??? > > If somebody can make

Re: SMTPS 465

Am 13.04.2013 12:43, schrieb Joan Moreau: > This lead to a error 404. > Maybe can you rather explain how "toppost" would solve the SSL problem? you should post your reply BELOW the quote to make a thread readable by people which may come later to it and they may ignore it if it is unreadable for

Re: SMTPS 465

This lead to a error 404. Maybe can you rather explain how "toppost" would solve the SSL problem ? Thank in advance joan Le 12/04/2013 22:14, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit : > --On Friday, April 12, 2013 9:05 PM + Joan Moreau > wrote: > Please don't top-post. I do not understand

Re: SMTPS 465

yes, I kind of agree with you, however, would it be with SSL or STARTTLS, I get the same error (which did not appear before I upgraded my kernel) What could be the solution ? Le 12/04/2013 22:50, b...@bitrate.net a écrit : > On Apr 12, 2013, at 15.25, Joan Moreau wrote: > >> Hi, I am stuc

Re: New Postfix log analyzer tool, statistics, grapher, ... PostgreSQL DB 9.2.x based

Mmhhh... What can I say??? If somebody can make the full product working on another platform, then I would be happy to propose the corresponding archive on Sourceforge available files project page... But for now the best answer is simply "it's like that". ;) Le 13/04/2013 11:31, LuKreme a é

Re: New Postfix log analyzer tool, statistics, grapher, ... PostgreSQL DB 9.2.x based

On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:29, Nicolas HAHN wrote: > a Linux server It requires Linux? Why would it require Linux? -- you'd think you could trust a horde of hungarian barbarians