On 4 Mar 2013, at 14:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
Maybe I am complacent in my expectation that I can ask for an A record
and receive a CNAME in return, but what else would/could one expect -
isn't this the behavior of CNAMEs?
No. A CNAME record provides the canonical name that should be used
inst
On 3/4/2013 1:42 PM, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 04/03/2013 20:35, Noel Jones a écrit :
>> On 3/4/2013 1:02 PM, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> For a lab test, with several computers sending mail to any domain, I
>>> would like to setup a postfix server accepting and storing
>>> locally to
>
Robert Schetterer wrote the following on 3/4/2013 1:08 PM:
Am 04.03.2013 19:46, schrieb Blake Hudson:
Robert Schetterer wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:37 PM:
Am 04.03.2013 19:31, schrieb Blake Hudson:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with a
Le 04/03/2013 20:35, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 3/4/2013 1:02 PM, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Hello,
For a lab test, with several computers sending mail to any domain, I
would like to setup a postfix server accepting and storing locally to
only one account any mail received. It would be a sort of blac
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:22:39PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
> I still am unsure if it's valid to ask for a PTR record and receive
> a CNAME in return. If it is, I assume that CNAME needs to lead to a
> valid PTR record at some point.
The way it works: when you query for any type and get a CNAM
On 3/4/2013 1:02 PM, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For a lab test, with several computers sending mail to any domain, I
> would like to setup a postfix server accepting and storing locally to
> only one account any mail received. It would be a sort of blackhole
> relay server, but with m
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:02:30PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> For a lab test, with several computers sending mail to any domain,
> I would like to setup a postfix server accepting and storing
> locally to only one account any mail received. It would be a sort
> of blackhole relay server, b
/dev/rob0 wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:56 PM:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 12:31:08PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
KSB wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:13 PM:
On 2013.03.04. 20:06, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a
host (in fact several hos
Am 04.03.2013 19:46, schrieb Blake Hudson:
>
> Robert Schetterer wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:37 PM:
>> Am 04.03.2013 19:31, schrieb Blake Hudson:
>>> OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
>>> a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does
Hello,
For a lab test, with several computers sending mail to any domain, I
would like to setup a postfix server accepting and storing locally to
only one account any mail received. It would be a sort of blackhole
relay server, but with mail kept locally, no mail going out from it.
Any idea on
Am 04.03.2013 19:06, schrieb Blake Hudson:
> Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a host (in
> fact several hosts from the same ISP)
> does not have rDNS, because our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking
> up a PTR record for it. The IP in
> question is 63.171
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 12:31:08PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
> KSB wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:13 PM:
> >On 2013.03.04. 20:06, Blake Hudson wrote:
> >>Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a
> >>host (in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have
> >>rDN
Robert Schetterer wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:37 PM:
Am 04.03.2013 19:31, schrieb Blake Hudson:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
resolve?
yeah ,my dns cache didnt resolved it
had
Pau Amma wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:40 PM:
On Mon, March 4, 2013 6:31 pm, Blake Hudson wrote:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
resolve?
Does for me. *shrug*
$ dig +noall +quest
On Mon, March 4, 2013 6:31 pm, Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
> a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
> resolve?
Does for me. *shrug*
$ dig +noall +question +answer -x 63.171.0.212
;212.0.171.63.in-ad
Am 04.03.2013 19:31, schrieb Blake Hudson:
> OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
> a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
> resolve?
yeah ,my dns cache didnt resolved it
had to be reloaded
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
KSB wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:13 PM:
On 2013.03.04. 20:06, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a host
(in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS, because
our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR record f
Am 04.03.2013 18:52, schrieb motty cruz:
> Hello,
> my company has three domain, our spam filters are running Postfix and
> our IMAP server is also running Postfix.
>
> I want to re-construct our email system to have fault tolerance and
> 99% up time. Any suggestions?
>
> Also, I would like fo
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:06:20 -0600
Blake Hudson wrote:
> Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a
> host (in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS,
> because our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR
> record for it. The IP in question i
On 2013.03.04. 20:06, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a host
(in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS, because
our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR record for it.
The IP in question is 63.171.0.212. From
On 03/04/2013 01:06 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a
> host (in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS,
> because our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR
> record for it. The IP in question is 63.171.0
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a host
(in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS, because
our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR record for it.
The IP in question is 63.171.0.212. From my perspective, this IP does
not have a
Hello,
my company has three domain, our spam filters are running Postfix and our
IMAP server is also running Postfix.
I want to re-construct our email system to have fault tolerance and 99% up
time. Any suggestions?
Also, I would like for our clients to be able to change their E-mail
passwords, I
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:03:03PM +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
> debug_peer_list = 192.168.16.19 192.168.16.141
If this were your configuration, logs for connections from these
clients would be verbose. Are they?
> imap_submit_cred_file = /Library/Server/Mail/Config/postfix/submit.cred
This is an
Quoting jeffrey j donovan :
what version of osx server ? if osx 10.7 or higher and you have
included the " ServerApp " there are two mail configs;
One is for the System
One is for the ServerApp. The setting are located in
/Library/Server/Mail/config/postfix
Thanks for your reply Jeffre
On Mar 4, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the simple requirement to allow email relay from other local machines
> to a (Mac OS X) postfix server.
>
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, [::1]/128, 192.168.16.0/24
>
>
> thanks in advance for any tips,
>
> thanks, Andy.
Greetin
Hi,
I have the simple requirement to allow email relay from other local
machines to a (Mac OS X) postfix server. This is so I can send emails
from shell scripts running on any of the local machines from this
office. So my wish is that I can relay mails from any machine in
subnet 192.168
27 matches
Mail list logo
