Re: unable to resolve host name issue ?

Am 02.03.2013 03:41, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au: > I have postfix 2.6.6 on centos 6, in use about 1 year, no known issues > > couple of weeks ago struck a problem unable to deliver email to any user > on domain "pinewood.ie" with "A record/host not found" (1): > > pinewood.ie mx are on cleanmail0

unable to resolve host name issue ?

I have postfix 2.6.6 on centos 6, in use about 1 year, no known issues couple of weeks ago struck a problem unable to deliver email to any user on domain "pinewood.ie" with "A record/host not found" (1): pinewood.ie mx are on cleanmail02.cdsoft.ie/cleanmail01.cdsoft.ie tried putting MX IP/hostna

An access policy daemon for checking Unix filesystem quotas

Hi, As the subject says, I tried my hand at a very simple Postfix access policy daemon to reject delivery if the (Unix-style) filesystem quota has exceeded. It does nothing if the recipient doesn't look like a local Unix user. I'm not sure if I did it right but it seems to be working here. In c

ldap_table and insignificant spaces

Hi I found that one MTA bounced several mails. The mails where sent to `" test"@example.com' and accepted by Postfix. The backend LMTP then rejected the mails. This is what I found out: - RCPT TO:<" test"@example.com> - The ldap table gets the sanitized address: ` t...@example.com' (note the l

Re: Message delivered despite restrictions

Am 01.03.2013 13:44, schrieb Chris: > On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:28:26 +0100 Reindl Harald > wrote >>> Fair enough, but what if I want to block specifically "adsklix.com" and not >>> the whole hostgator domain? header_checks? >> >> why? >> >> if they ignore abuse-mails and support sending spam bloc

Re: Message delivered despite restrictions

On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:28:26 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote > Am 01.03.2013 13:06, schrieb Chris: > > On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:36:27 +0100 Reindl Harald > > wrote > >> Am 01.03.2013 12:26, schrieb Chris: > Return-Path: > Delivered-To: XXX > [...] > From: adsklix_advertisers-ow...@

Re: Message delivered despite restrictions

Am 01.03.2013 13:06, schrieb Chris: > On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:36:27 +0100 Reindl Harald > wrote > >> Am 01.03.2013 12:26, schrieb Chris: Return-Path: Delivered-To: XXX [...] From: adsklix_advertisers-ow...@adsklix.com To: XXX Subject: XXX Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:

Re: Message delivered despite restrictions

On 3/1/2013 6:06 AM, Chris wrote: > On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:36:27 +0100 Reindl Harald > wrote > >> Am 01.03.2013 12:26, schrieb Chris: Return-Path: Delivered-To: XXX [...] From: adsklix_advertisers-ow...@adsklix.com To: XXX Subject: XXX Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:00:0

Re: Message delivered despite restrictions

On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:36:27 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote > Am 01.03.2013 12:26, schrieb Chris: > >> Return-Path: > >> Delivered-To: XXX > >> [...] > >> From: adsklix_advertisers-ow...@adsklix.com > >> To: XXX > >> Subject: XXX > >> Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:00:08 -0600 > >> Message-ID: > > > I have "a

Re: Message delivered despite restrictions

Chris: > Return-Path: That is the envelope sender address (in SMTP, the MAIL FROM command). > I have "adsklix.com" explicitly listed in > /etc/postfix/domain_user_blocks: That is not the envelope sender address (in SMTP, the MAIL FROM command). Wietse

Re: Message delivered despite restrictions

Am 01.03.2013 12:26, schrieb Chris: >> Return-Path: >> Delivered-To: XXX >> [...] >> From: adsklix_advertisers-ow...@adsklix.com >> To: XXX >> Subject: XXX >> Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:00:08 -0600 >> Message-ID: > I have "adsklix.com" explicitly listed in > /etc/postfix/domain_user_blocks: but the

Message delivered despite restrictions

Hi all. Today this message was delivered to my inbox despite the fact that I've listed the sender in a hash map. I can't figure out why: > Return-Path: > Delivered-To: XXX > [...] > From: adsklix_advertisers-ow...@adsklix.com > To: XXX > Subject: XXX > Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:00:08 -0600 > Message-ID