Charles Marcus:
> Hello all,
>
> We finally ditched postini for MailDistiller for our anti-spam service,
> and are mostly happy, but we're having a problem receiving certain
> emails from a site affiliated with our Bank of America accounts...
Looking at mail that *is delivered* won't tell you w
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 03:29:31 PM John Allen wrote:
> On 31/01/2013 6:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> > i wanted to have an experienced suggestion from Pros. i have been
> > going through from different steps deploying clamav and spamassassin,
> > one is "mailscanner" and seccond one i
Hello all,
We finally ditched postini for MailDistiller for our anti-spam service,
and are mostly happy, but we're having a problem receiving certain
emails from a site affiliated with our Bank of America accounts...
Here is the headers for a message that did actually get through today,
but
Thanks all for all your support :) its been very helpful
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:29 AM, John Allen wrote:
>
> On 31/01/2013 6:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
> i wanted to have an experienced suggestion from Pros. i have been
> going through from different steps deploying clamav and spamass
On 31/01/2013 6:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
i wanted to have an experienced suggestion from Pros. i have been
going through from different steps deploying clamav and spamassassin,
one is "mailscanner" and seccond one is "clamd with clamsmtp"
in your expert opinion which one is the right t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/31/2013 1:40 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> * Noel Jones 2013.01.31 18:23:
>
>> Other than the obvious?
>
> That is a tad bit vague. When I looked at the milter some
> (long) time ago, it was far less intuitive than a dedicated
> SMTP interface. I
* Noel Jones 2013.01.31 18:23:
> Other than the obvious?
That is a tad bit vague. When I looked at the milter some (long) time ago, it
was far less intuitive than a dedicated SMTP interface. It also gave very
little to no messages indicating it actually processed mail. I went with
clamsmtp at
On 1/31/2013 8:26 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, January 31, 2013 06:33:45 AM Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 1/31/2013 5:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>>> i wanted to have an experienced suggestion from Pros. i have been
>>> going through from different steps deploying clamav and spamassas
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 06:33:45 AM Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/31/2013 5:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> > i wanted to have an experienced suggestion from Pros. i have been
> > going through from different steps deploying clamav and spamassassin,
> > one is "mailscanner" and seccond one is
On 1/31/2013 7:21 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>> Mailscanner is "not recommended" for use with postfix. clamsmtp is
>> more complicated than using the bundled clamav-milter.
>>
> since i am new and just trying to explore things so would you please
> share why not mailscanner? for my learning
>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/31/2013 5:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>> i wanted to have an experienced suggestion from Pros. i have been
>> going through from different steps deploying clamav and spamassassin,
>> one is "mailscanner" and seccond one is "clamd wit
On 1/31/2013 5:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> i wanted to have an experienced suggestion from Pros. i have been
> going through from different steps deploying clamav and spamassassin,
> one is "mailscanner" and seccond one is "clamd with clamsmtp"
> in your expert opinion which one is the rig
* Asa Gage [2013-01-30 17:07:47 -0500]:
> I seem to be missing smtp log events regarding delivery status for TLS
> enabled mail when smtp_tls_loglevel = 3. I see a ton of TLS data as
> expected, but the actual smtp result is no longer present. Is there any
> explanation for this behavior?
> ma
13 matches
Mail list logo
