Stan Hoeppner:
> On 12/1/2012 2:26 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Stan Hoeppner:
> >> ...and I have no experience and pay no
> >> attention to what Oracle is doing with Solaris virtualization,
> >> "containers" I believe they call it.
> >
> > Solaris containers are descendants from FreeBSD jails: th
On 12/1/2012 2:26 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> ...and I have no experience and pay no
>> attention to what Oracle is doing with Solaris virtualization,
>> "containers" I believe they call it.
>
> Solaris containers are descendants from FreeBSD jails: they provide
> different userla
IMAP List Administration:
> Summary:
> - upgraded OS
> - upgraded Postfix
> - cut local named out of system
>
> but no change. Anyone have a suggestion as to how to pursue this problem?
Obviously, the above attempts all share the same problem, i.e. the
problem is your network or some
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 09:31:41PM +0100, IMAP List Administration wrote:
> At any rate, we periodically see (1-5 times per day) a "Client host rejected:
> cannot find your hostname" rejection, followed by a successful retry from the
> remote MTA. When we check the DNS records, they always appear
[original post at bottom]
in the meantime I've upgraded the OS to OpenBSD v5.2, which offers 2 postfix
versions as packages:
postfix-2.10.20120630
postfix-2.9.3
I chose v2.9.3.
bind is still "BIND 9.4.2-P2"
On 11/13/2012 10:50 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:55:11PM +
Stan Hoeppner:
> ...and I have no experience and pay no
> attention to what Oracle is doing with Solaris virtualization,
> "containers" I believe they call it.
Solaris containers are descendants from FreeBSD jails: they provide
different userland namespaces(*) on top of a shared OS kernel.
Hardwa
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 11/30/2012 4:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
in the real world submission is useless if IMAP is down
because the client will fail to store in "sent messages"
In the real world most road warriors use POP, not IMAP, and those with
consistent connectivity that do make use of
On 12/1/2012 11:11 AM, Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I would like to know how to stop/forbid this server to send us their emails
>
> The content of received email is
>
> Received: from web-groupsolweb1.aquaray.com (unknown [95.128.42.80])
> by mail.domain.tld (Postfix) wi
Hi Everyone,
I would like to know how to stop/forbid this server to send us their emails
The content of received email is
Received: from web-groupsolweb1.aquaray.com (unknown [95.128.42.80])
by mail.domain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP
for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:56:49 +0100 (CET)
Recei
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 09:51:05AM +0100, wimpunk wrote:
> The reason I searched for this is because I just wanted to make my
> own management easier. I had a .forward+a file which filtered the
> mail to a specific folder in my mailbox. Because I wanted the mail
> send to ${user}+b and ${user}
WebprodsPT:
> On 12/01/2012 10:15 AM, WebprodsPT wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a multiple instance Postfix setup. The first (original) one was
> > configured with dovecot with the property:
> >
> > smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth-client
You can't share a relative pathname. You may, however, be a
wimpunk:
> If you want to check on malicious links, postfix could verify if the
> link it points to is a file with the correct features.
The .forward file is a "program" that can execute arbitrary shell
commands and that can write to arbitrary files, with the privileges
of the recipient (which may
Am 01.12.2012 12:24, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 01.12.2012 03:03, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>> On 11/30/2012 5:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 01.12.2012 00:19, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
In the real world most road warriors use POP, not IMAP, and those with
consistent connectivity tha
Am 01.12.2012 03:03, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 11/30/2012 5:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 01.12.2012 00:19, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>>> In the real world most road warriors use POP, not IMAP, and those with
>>> consistent connectivity that do make use of IMAP do it via web mail. So
>>> the
Am 01.12.2012 02:21, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 11/30/2012 6:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Stan Hoeppner:
>>> That said, given the ongoing clock issues that all the guest/hypervisor
>>> combos have always experienced to some degree, and will forever
>>> experience no matter how good the mitigat
On 12/01/2012 10:15 AM, WebprodsPT wrote:
Hello,
I have a multiple instance Postfix setup. The first (original) one was
configured with dovecot with the property:
smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth-client
This path represents a socket where dovecot listens to postfix
connections (pardon me if this
Hello,
I have a multiple instance Postfix setup. The first (original) one was
configured with dovecot with the property:
smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth-client
This path represents a socket where dovecot listens to postfix
connections (pardon me if this description is not 100% accurate).
No
On 11/30/2012 01:28 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
WebprodsPT:
Hello,
I am the administrator of a Postfix setup with multiple domains,
multiple IP addresses and SSL configured and up and running. Everything
was configured by myself and I have no restrictions on the mail server
machine so basically I
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> wimpunk:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > wimpunk:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I've been wondering why my .forward files didn't worked like I
>> >> expected and finally I found out dotforward doesn't accept linked
>>
19 matches
Mail list logo
