* Muhammad Yousuf Khan :
> > and mime_header_checks with:
> > /filename=\"(.*)\.(...)\"$/ WARN Attachment $1.$2
>
> Thanks for the help. but any suggestion for the attachment size.
Not possible with postfix alone. If you put Amavis in the loop, you
get to see the attachment names & sizes at log
i am using my ISP relay. and i don't receive NDRs for any invalid or
unknown account. is this default. or i must be doing some config
mistakes.
however, in log files i can see that my message has been relayed to
the ISP smtp. but i do not receive any NDR. any idea. please help?
Thanks
MYK
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Muhammad Yousuf Khan :
>
>> is there any way that i can collect reports in which i can check who
>> is the "sender" who is the "receiver" what was the mail "subject", if
>
> You can log this using
>
> header_checks with:
> /^Subject:/ WA
[cut]
> Postfix has built-in "WARN" actions in header_checks that can log
> message subjects and attachment names, but there is no built-in
> support to log details such as attachment sizes.
if not built-in then any workaround would you like to suggest.
[cut]
On 11/21/2012 11:14 PM, Jumping Mouse wrote:
> I am using a inbound gateway: postfix smtp server to deliver email locally
> and forward email to Google Servers for Google apps email accounts.
> I would like to make sure that all email that is forwarded to the google
> servers passes through an
I am using a inbound gateway: postfix smtp server to deliver email locally and
forward email to Google Servers for Google apps email accounts.
I would like to make sure that all email that is forwarded to the google
servers passes through an encrypted connection. Does postfix do this by
defau
HI Robert,
Please find mail.info of my mail server.
--
From
Kamlesh Verma
On 11/21/2012 08:26 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 21.11.2012 15:46, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 21.11.2012 14:45, schrieb kamleshverma:
Every day i m seeing hundreds of mails in mailq, all they are having
unkn
Alex:
> Nov 21 19:39:14 mail01 postfix/postscreen[9111]: PASS OLD
> [198.41.120.10]:47864
>
> They were later all tagged as spam, but it would definitely be nice to
> be blocking these outright with postscreen. I've now added an iptables
Postscreen "forgets" DNSBL lookup results after one hour.
Hi,
>>> Nov 19 20:39:03 mail01 postfix/smtpd[19820]: lost connection after
>>> CONNECT from listserver.translateplanmulti.info[198.41.120.7]
>>
>> Your server is too slow, so that connections pile up in front of
>> it.
>
> translateplanmulti.info is a snowshoe domain, 198.41.120.0/24, and
> everyo
On 11/21/12 23:44, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark:
>> postfix/smtp[49073]: warning: SASL authentication failure: GSSAPI Error:
>> Miscellaneous failure (see text) (open(/tmp/krb5cc_125): No such file
>> or directory)
>
> Postfix is the messenger that reports bad news from the SASL libr
Per olof Ljungmark:
> postfix/smtp[49073]: warning: SASL authentication failure: GSSAPI Error:
> Miscellaneous failure (see text) (open(/tmp/krb5cc_125): No such file
> or directory)
Postfix is the messenger that reports bad news from the SASL library.
The name /tmp/krb5cc* is normally used to s
Hi,
Got this error after changing the sasl_password in sasl_passwd. This is
on a host that relays all mail to one destination as specified in
"relayhost =". Nothing else was changed.
Same thing happened now on four different boxes and the only item
changed on all of them was the password in sasl_
On 11/20/2012 6:06 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alex:
>> Nov 19 20:39:03 mail01 postfix/smtpd[19820]: lost connection after
>> CONNECT from listserver.translateplanmulti.info[198.41.120.7]
>
> Your server is too slow, so that connections pile up in front of
> it.
translateplanmulti.info is a snows
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:14:25AM +0200, Ali Jawad wrote:
> Sorry that should have been telnet ip 587 not telnet ip 25 as you can
> not connect to port 25.
Well, your configuration settings *are* for port 25. So testing
port 587 is futile.
> >> x.x.x.x:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
> >> -o
On 11/21/2012 11:45 AM, Sam Jones wrote:
> Thank you so much Noel.
>
> That was exactly it, and to confuse matters even more it had been in my
> old config like that for a year with no warning coming up.
That's exactly why the "unused parameter" feature was invented; to
warn you that postfix mig
Thank you so much Noel.
That was exactly it, and to confuse matters even more it had been in my
old config like that for a year with no warning coming up.
I've removed the sleep 1, I have no idea why I put it there but as the
typo would have stopped it working I think it's safe to say I don't nee
On 11/21/2012 11:12 AM, Sam Jones wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> When I start my Postfix up (fresh install I'm trying to commission to
> take over newsletter duties) I'm seeing this:
>
> unused parameter: smtpd_client_restrictons=permit_mynetworks
> sleep 1, warn_if_reject reject_unauth_pipelining?
Good afternoon,
When I start my Postfix up (fresh install I'm trying to commission to
take over newsletter duties) I'm seeing this:
unused parameter: smtpd_client_restrictons=permit_mynetworks
sleep 1, warn_if_reject reject_unauth_pipelining?warn_if_reject
reject_unknown_client?permit
The chunk
On Nov 21, 2012, at 15:10, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Any comments on the following posted queries.
I suggest you read the documentation available, such as;
http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
http://www.postfix.org/CONTENT_INSPECTION_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
htt
* Muhammad Yousuf Khan :
> is there any way that i can collect reports in which i can check who
> is the "sender" who is the "receiver" what was the mail "subject", if
You can log this using
header_checks with:
/^Subject:/ WARN
and mime_header_checks with:
/filename=\"(.*)\.(...)\"$/ WARN Atta
Robert Schetterer:
> Am 21.11.2012 15:51, schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan:
> > Please help your experience advice is required.
> > my management is interested to see some reports from postfix logs,
> > is there any way that i can collect reports in which i can check who
> > is the "sender" who is the
Am 21.11.2012 15:51, schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan:
> Please help your experience advice is required.
> my management is interested to see some reports from postfix logs,
> is there any way that i can collect reports in which i can check who
> is the "sender" who is the "receiver"
pflogsumm or log
Am 21.11.2012 15:46, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 21.11.2012 14:45, schrieb kamleshverma:
>> Every day i m seeing hundreds of mails in mailq, all they are having
>> unknown domain name
>
> how did they get in your server ?
> show logs
>
> try using
>
> reject_unknown_sender_domain
> Rejec
Please help your experience advice is required.
my management is interested to see some reports from postfix logs,
is there any way that i can collect reports in which i can check who
is the "sender" who is the "receiver" what was the mail "subject", if
there is any "attachment" then what was the s
Am 21.11.2012 14:45, schrieb kamleshverma:
> Every day i m seeing hundreds of mails in mailq, all they are having
> unknown domain name
how did they get in your server ?
show logs
try using
reject_unknown_sender_domain
Reject the request when Postfix is not final destination for the
sender a
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:15:32 +0530
kamleshverma articulated:
> Every day i m seeing hundreds of mails in mailq, all they are having
> unknown domain name.
>
> I had changes in my Postfix server but I don't how to restrict this
> unwanted mails and due that my mail server showing blacklist in
> pu
Hi,
Any comments on the following posted queries.
Thanks in advance
Ashish
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Sharma, Ashish
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:35 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: C/C++
HI All,
Every day i m seeing hundreds of mails in mailq, all they are having
unknown domain name.
I had changes in my Postfix server but I don't how to restrict this
unwanted mails and due that my mail server showing blacklist in public
black lists..
Please find below my postfix configurat
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Wietse Venema
> wrote:
>
> > prashuppp p:
> > > I was trying to HOLD all the emails which has more then
> > > 2 recipient's using
> > > header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
> >
> > Use the SMTPD policy plug-in interface. What you ask
> > for will not
i know scripting,so do you refer me any good document or web link
on writing SMTPD policy scripts ?
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> prashuppp p:
> > I was trying to HOLD all the emails which has more then 2 recipient's
> > using header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_
prashuppp p:
> I was trying to HOLD all the emails which has more then 2 recipient's
> using header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
Use the SMTPD policy plug-in interface. What you ask
for will not be implemented in Postfix.
Wietse
yes,But am authorized to use only inbuilt mechanism. That's the reason i
have choosed header_check.But later i came to know that as it name
indicate's it can do only header .
2012/11/21 Ralf Hildebrandt
> * prashanth p :
> > ok..great..Is there any other method to do for envelope also..I need i
* prashanth p :
> ok..great..Is there any other method to do for envelope also..I need it for
> both..
You'd need a policy_daemon for that. Didn't you ask that before?
postfwd can easily do that.
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der
ok..great..Is there any other method to do for envelope also..I need it for
both..
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * prashuppp p :
> > I was trying to HOLD all the emails which has more then 2 recipient's
> > using header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
> >
* prashuppp p :
> I was trying to HOLD all the emails which has more then 2 recipient's
> using header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>
> /^(Cc|To):([^@]*@){2,}/ HOLD
header_checks only apply (AS THE NAME SAYS!) to... the headers.
No header, no match.
> But not working for the below
35 matches
Mail list logo
