Re: Postfix 2.8.x and archive options

2012-10-10 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 11.10.2012 07:28, schrieb Josef Karliak: > Good morning, > I know about Postfix's "always_bcc" that sends all emails to another > email mailbox. But are there some other options to archive emails ? For > example all emails will be copied to a some direcotory. How do you solve > your emails a

Postfix 2.8.x and archive options

2012-10-10 Thread Josef Karliak
Good morning, I know about Postfix's "always_bcc" that sends all emails to another email mailbox. But are there some other options to archive emails ? For example all emails will be copied to a some direcotory. How do you solve your emails archoves ? Thanks and best regards J.Karlia

Re: Is postscreen really this good?

2012-10-10 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On October 10, 2012 10:37:26 AM -0500 Noel Jones wrote: add your -o content_filter override to the new smtpd pass service. Thanks, Brian and Noel. I appreciate the help. I read all the readme files, but some of this stuff is above my pay grade. I get confused and am not sure what to

Re: Is postscreen really this good?

2012-10-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/10/2012 10:04 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > In reading the docs it says to comment out the smtp line and > uncomment the one that routes to postscreen. I have both uncommented. > Yes, that's important, only one will have control of port 25. > # grep -v "#" /usr/local/etc/postfix/master.cf |

Re: Is postscreen really this good?

2012-10-10 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 10/10/2012 11:04 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I think I may not what's wrong. Here's the master.cf settings: > > In reading the docs it says to comment out the smtp line and uncomment > the one that routes to postscreen. I have both uncommented. > > # grep -v "#" /usr/local/etc/postfix/master.cf

Re: Is postscreen really this good?

2012-10-10 Thread Paul Schmehl
I think I may not what's wrong. Here's the master.cf settings: # grep -v "#" /usr/local/etc/postfix/master.cf smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=filter:dummyr smtpsinet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes

Re: AW: How to change queue id?

2012-10-10 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 10/03/2012 11:30 PM, Steffen Schebesta wrote: Thanks for all the insightful answers. So, I actually use the long_queue_ids options and I save the queue_ids to a database to later compare them to the queue_ids found in the mail log to parse and mark the bounces. The problem - and thus the sour

Re: Is postscreen really this good?

2012-10-10 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On October 10, 2012 7:12:19 AM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: The Stovebolt Geek: Recently I found out about postscreen on this list. After reading about it, I implemented it in pretty much the default configuration (copied below.) postscreen_bare_newline_action = ignore postscreen_bare_new

Re: postscreen on Debian

2012-10-10 Thread Simon Deziel
On 12-10-10 09:56 AM, Peter Berghold wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Peter Berghold > wrote: > > Am I missing something here or is postscreen missing from Debian > 6.0.3? At what version of postfix is postscreen included? > > > OK... found my a

Re: postscreen on Debian

2012-10-10 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On 10.10.2012 15:56, Peter Berghold wrote: OK... found my answer on my own. Nevermind. Looks like Debian squeeze is stuck at postfix 2.7.1 so if I want to use postscreen on my inbound mail server I'll have to build from source. http://packages.debian.org/squeeze-backports/postfix -- Herbe

Re: postscreen on Debian

2012-10-10 Thread Duane Hill
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 at 13:43:13 UTC, salty.cowd...@gmail.com confabulated: > Am I missing something here or is postscreen missing from Debian 6.0.3? At > what version of postfix is postscreen included? According to documentation, Postfix version 2.8 and later: http://www.postfix.o

Re: postscreen on Debian

2012-10-10 Thread Peter Berghold
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Peter Berghold wrote: > Am I missing something here or is postscreen missing from Debian 6.0.3? > At what version of postfix is postscreen included? > > OK... found my answer on my own. Nevermind. Looks like Debian squeeze is stuck at postfix 2.7.1 so if I want

Re: Is postscreen really this good?

2012-10-10 Thread k...@rice.edu
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:38:57PM -0500, The Stovebolt Geek wrote: > I've been running postfix with policyd-weight and spamassassin for > years on a small hobby domain that I manage. I usually have a few > hundred spam messages in the spam folder after a few days. > > Recently I found out about

Re: Is postscreen really this good?

2012-10-10 Thread Wietse Venema
The Stovebolt Geek: > Recently I found out about postscreen on this list. After reading about > it, I implemented it in pretty much the default configuration (copied > below.) > postscreen_bare_newline_action = ignore > postscreen_bare_newline_enable = no > postscreen_blacklist_action = ignore