On 9/11/2012 3:30 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * gsom :
>> Hello!
>>
>> I wish to anonimize my users' mail and cut of some headers. But only
>> from my clients authenticated throw smtp auth. Mail from others domains
>> not mine should not be affected cause it breaks dkim checks (for example
>>
On 9/11/2012 4:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> David J. Weller-Fahy:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
>> * Noel Jones [2012-09-10 23:23 -0400]:
>>> On 9/10/2012 9:20 PM, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
1) Am I correct that blocking recipient addresses which consist of
an existing user with an
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:45:03PM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> Long ago I saw a request from a customer that wanted to be able
> to send out 1M in an hour I believe it was.
$ echo 10 6 ^ 3600 / p | dc
277
This is 277 messages per second, and does not require any extreme
measur
David J. Weller-Fahy:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Noel Jones [2012-09-10 23:23 -0400]:
> > On 9/10/2012 9:20 PM, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> > > 1) Am I correct that blocking recipient addresses which consist of
> > > an existing user with an extension not defined by that user (in a
> >
* Noel Jones [2012-09-10 23:23 -0400]:
> On 9/10/2012 9:20 PM, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> > 1) Am I correct that blocking recipient addresses which consist of
> > an existing user with an extension not defined by that user (in a
> > .forward-extension file) is not possible using Postfix using j
I don't think the problem will be with the "marketing" software, i.e. the
component generating the messages, that is the easy part. The harder part is
on the MTA to deliver those. Long ago I saw a request from a customer that
wanted to be able to send out 1M in an hour I believe it was. I th
* gsom :
> Hello!
>
> I wish to anonimize my users' mail and cut of some headers. But only
> from my clients authenticated throw smtp auth. Mail from others domains
> not mine should not be affected cause it breaks dkim checks (for example
> from gmail).
> I've tried headers_check but it changes h
Hello!
I wish to anonimize my users' mail and cut of some headers. But only
from my clients authenticated throw smtp auth. Mail from others domains
not mine should not be affected cause it breaks dkim checks (for example
from gmail).
I've tried headers_check but it changes headers in all letters.
Asai:
Greetings,
Trying to send email from an iPad which fails consistently. I'm trying
to send via port 587, TLS (self-signed cert, which is installed on
iPad). iPad tells me that "Password" authentication isn't supported.
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks = $mynetwo
> Thanks, I routinely use a "double word" detector, but I don't have
> a "double multi-word" detector.
>
> Wietse
>
I'm glad I was of help :)
Have a nice day!
Fabio
Fabio Sangiovanni:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to point out a possibile typo at
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#qmgr_message_recipient_limit:
>
> [?] the maximal *size of the size* of the short-term, in-memory
> "dead" destination status cache.
Thanks, I routinely use a "double word" detector, bu
Hi,
I'd like to point out a possibile typo at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#qmgr_message_recipient_limit:
[…] the maximal *size of the size* of the short-term, in-memory "dead"
destination status cache.
Thanks,
Fabio Sangiovanni
DN Singh:
> We some trouble with rediff deliveries, and therefore were trying this
> combination. While searching the archives, we found that rediff does not
> like connection caching, and about the recipient_limit option. The rate
With recipient_limit=1, the Postfix scheduler will try to deliver
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:54:52PM +0300, KSB wrote:
> On 2012.09.11. 15:20, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >Yes. I am perfectly happy when Postfix solves 90% well. Especially
> >because those 90% are not just the easy problems.
> I like Posftix so this is a hard decision to switch to other MTA to
> not h
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:26:07PM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
>
> > domain3_destination_rate_delay = 30s
> > domain3_destination_recipient_limit = 1
>
> This combination is unlikely to yield the results you expect. When
> a transport's recipi
Thanks for the help everyone, All is now working fine.
Used this guide to update to 2.9.4
(http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/)
Thanks Naval for giving me the solution.
OVE JK. EVENSEN | CHIEF ENGINEER
-Original Message-
From: o
On 11/9/2012 11:33 πμ, Rob Sterenborg wrote:
Simon J. Mudd creates RHEL RPM packages:
http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.9/
The above doesn't seem to have any CentOS 6 RPMs/SRPMs.
I currently only know of:
http://centos.alt.ru/pub/repository/centos/6/SRPMS/postfix-2.9.4-1.el6.src.rpm
http://cent
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:26:07PM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
>
> > domain3_destination_rate_delay = 30s
> > domain3_destination_recipient_limit = 1
>
> This combination is unlikely to yield the results you expect. When
> a transport's recipient limit is set to 1, its concurrency
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:26:07PM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
> domain3_destination_rate_delay = 30s
> domain3_destination_recipient_limit = 1
This combination is unlikely to yield the results you expect. When
a transport's recipient limit is set to 1, its concurrency is
measured *per-mailbox*, not
DN Singh:
> I had a doubt about concurrency. Can it be that there are multiple
> connections to the destination? Although documentation suggests otherwise.
The logging shows that the connections in my real-life example are
separated by 5 seconds. The logging also shows that the messages
were submi
On 2012.09.11. 15:20, Wietse Venema wrote:
Yes. I am perfectly happy when Postfix solves 90% well. Especially
because those 90% are not just the easy problems.
Wietse
I like Posftix so this is a hard decision to switch to other MTA to not
have to cut down features for clients...
Il 11/09/2012 14:15, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Basic Internet email: no whitespace before a header label. Wietse
Thank you for your support, now works as expected
Best regards
--
Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> DN Singh:
> > > > > > What is the output from:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > postmap -q rediffmail.com hash:/etc/postfix/transport
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > The command gives below output:
> > > > ==
> > > > domain3:
> > > > ==
KSB:
> On 2012.09.11. 13:56, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > Your specialized niche problem is not in the 90% of the problem
> > space that Postfix solves. Postfix does not have to solve all
> > problems.
>
> So You suggest to stick with other MTA?
Yes. I am perfectly happy when Postfix solves 90% w
Andrea Cappelli:
> Il 11/09/2012 12:58, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> > First, test with "postconf -b". If the result is right then something
> > down-stream is messing up Postfix's bounces. Wietse
>
> The test with postconf -b shows no error and expand the variable
> $myhostname to the right val
DN Singh:
> > > > > What is the output from:
> > > > >
> > > > > postmap -q rediffmail.com hash:/etc/postfix/transport
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > The command gives below output:
> > > ==
> > > domain3:
> > > ==
> >
> > What is the output from:
> >
> > postconf | grep '^
On 2012.09.11. 13:56, Wietse Venema wrote:
Your specialized niche problem is not in the 90% of the problem
space that Postfix solves. Postfix does not have to solve all
problems.
Wietse
So You suggest to stick with other MTA?
__
KSB
Il 11/09/2012 12:58, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
First, test with "postconf -b". If the result is right then something
down-stream is messing up Postfix's bounces. Wietse
The test with postconf -b shows no error and expand the variable
$myhostname to the right value, but Charset and and other t
Andrea Cappelli:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about bounce template.
>
> My problem is that when the bounce is sent Charset, From, Subject and
> Postmaster (as indicated in http://www.postfix.org/bounce.5.html) are
> inserted in the body of mail and not used for the respective funciont on
>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Domain Singh:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:13 PM, DN Singh wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sep 10, 2012 7:02 PM, "Wietse Venema" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > DN Singh:
> > > > > Sep 10 *18:15:34* ho
KSB:
> On 2012.09.10. 16:46, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > They just read it from the victim's mail folder.
> >
> > Simson Garfinkel collected hundreds of second-hand disk drives, and
> > a good way to identify the user of the disk was to look for the
> > most frequent email address.
> > http://www.d
Domain Singh:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:13 PM, DN Singh wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sep 10, 2012 7:02 PM, "Wietse Venema" wrote:
> > >
> > > DN Singh:
> > > > Sep 10 *18:15:34* hostname postfix/master[1227]: reload -- version
> > 2.9.3,
> > > > configu
Hi all,
I have a question about bounce template.
My problem is that when the bounce is sent Charset, From, Subject and
Postmaster (as indicated in http://www.postfix.org/bounce.5.html) are
inserted in the body of mail and not used for the respective funciont on
the sent mail.
I only configu
On 2012.09.10. 16:46, Wietse Venema wrote:
They just read it from the victim's mail folder.
Simson Garfinkel collected hundreds of second-hand disk drives, and
a good way to identify the user of the disk was to look for the
most frequent email address.
http://www.dfrws.org/2006/proceedings/10-G
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ove JK. Evensen
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:09 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Postscreen Error: /usr/libexec/postfix/postscreen: No
> such file
Am 11.09.2012 10:08, schrieb Ove JK. Evensen:
> OK, last question:
> I am looking here: http://www.postfix.org/packages.html and then -> here for
> centos http://ramix.jp/~ramsy/postfix.html
>
> And it says the last version is a 2.6 so clearly that is the reason why I get
> this in centos:
>
>
OK, last question:
I am looking here: http://www.postfix.org/packages.html and then -> here for
centos http://ramix.jp/~ramsy/postfix.html
And it says the last version is a 2.6 so clearly that is the reason why I get
this in centos:
Setting up Install Process
Package 2:postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x
Thanks, feel a bit stupid now..
OVE JK. EVENSEN | CHIEF ENGINEER
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
Sent: 11 September 2012 09:07
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postscreen Erro
Am 11.09.2012 09:54, schrieb Ove JK. Evensen:
> /usr/libexec/postfix/postscreen: No such file or directory
have a look there
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
* Ove JK. Evensen :
> Hi All
>
> Just want to say thanks for having a look at my problem!
> So here goes:
>
> Trying to setup a postfix with postscreen, mailscanner, calmav and mailwatch
> (Running on Centos 6.3)(postfix 2.6.6)
http://www.postfix.org/postscreen.8.html
HISTORY
This servi
Hi All
Just want to say thanks for having a look at my problem!
So here goes:
Trying to setup a postfix with postscreen, mailscanner, calmav and mailwatch
(Running on Centos 6.3)(postfix 2.6.6)
Everything is working fine, so now when I want to do the last thing and
activate postscreen on postfi
41 matches
Mail list logo
