On 8/18/2012 8:51 PM, අයි. ඩී. චාමින්ද ඉන්ද්රජිත් wrote:
> Thank you very much for your help...
>
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>> I have configured Enkive Mail Archive Server and pointed Messages of
>>> my mail server to Enkive as follows.
>>>
Thank you very much for your help...
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema wrote:
Dear All,
I have configured Enkive Mail Archive Server and pointed Messages of
my mail server to Enkive as follows.
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o con
On 08/18/12 15:23 , Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> No. However, if you know that a domain is hosted by GoDaddy,
> then you can make a transport map:
>
> example.com smtp:[smtp.secureserver.net]
>
> and Postfix will bundle all recipients in those domains.
Thank-you, for the explanation and t
Henry Stryker:
> I have defined a few custom smtp transports to limit deliveries to
> certain large domains such as Yahoo and Hotmail. These are applied via
> the transport map file to match recipient address domains.
>
> There are a large number of recipients I would like to use a custom
> trans
Please do not hijack threads. When starting a new thread on list, you
should do a "new message" rather than a "reply to list". Thank you.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 02:32:45PM -0700, Henry Stryker wrote:
> I have defined a few custom smtp transports to limit deliveries to
> certain large domains su
I have defined a few custom smtp transports to limit deliveries to
certain large domains such as Yahoo and Hotmail. These are applied via
the transport map file to match recipient address domains.
There are a large number of recipients I would like to use a custom
transport for, but whose actual
tobi:
> So I thought that must be solved somehow easier and more automatically.
> My basic idea is to regularly scan the mailq for mails defered by
> "overquota". From these mails in queue I fetch the recipients and add
> them to a recipient-restriction file for postfix. So postfix can reject
> suc
Hello list
I need your experience here to see if "my" solution is good or bad :-)
Background:
We have a postfix setup which can only check users quota after postfix
accepted the message. As you can imagine we produce a lot of
backscatter. Until now the procedure was to manually check mailq and
del
On 8/17/2012 8:50 PM, James wrote:
>
> I apologize if this does show up on the list as a duplicate (it is not in the
> archive (yet)).
> I wasn't a member of the list when I sent it (I was rejoining).
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: restrict submission
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 20
