On 8/5/2012 11:24 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote:
On 8/5/2012 10:13 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote:
The client would be on my local network only /192.168.0.*/ and for
any email sending I configure postfix so that it tries to use TLS if
the client support it.
So to sum up I want the user /maintenance/ to be abl
On 8/5/2012 10:54 PM, email builder wrote:
> I seek clarification about reject_unlisted_recipient and
> smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient
>
> If smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient is enabled, WHEN does this check take
> place in the scheme of smtpd_*_restrictions?
Think of it as being silently adde
On 8/5/2012 11:24 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote:
>
>> On 8/5/2012 10:13 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote:
>>> The client would be on my local network only /192.168.0.*/ and for
>>> any email sending I configure postfix so that it tries to use TLS if
>>> the client support it.
>>>
>>> So to sum up I want the user /ma
On 8/5/2012 10:13 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote:
The client would be on my local network only /192.168.0.*/ and for
any email sending I configure postfix so that it tries to use TLS if
the client support it.
So to sum up I want the user /maintenance/ to be able to send any
email only from /192.168.0.*
I seek clarification about reject_unlisted_recipient and
smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient
If smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient is enabled, WHEN does this check take place
in the scheme of smtpd_*_restrictions? I'm not sure, but it looks like it
might happen only if and after a PERMIT in the recip
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 07:48:56AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 8/4/2012 10:08 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> >> postscreen_client_connection_count_limit = 10
> >
> > I'm not sure why you did this. Some MTAs, notably qmail, are
> > likely to assault you with many simultaneous connections. This
>
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 04:41:25PM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2012, at 10:08 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > I'm not addressing the subject of the post, but just picking
> > over the configuration snippet.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:48:45PM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> >> [root@mt
On 8/5/2012 10:13 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote:
>
> The client would be on my local network only /192.168.0.*/ and for
> any email sending I configure postfix so that it tries to use TLS if
> the client support it.
>
> So to sum up I want the user /maintenance/ to be able to send any
> email only from /
* Adam NEVERT:
I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
I can tell it is a user because it is in my alias_maps
take a deep breath!
you c
Am 05.08.2012 22:45, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Reindl Harald :
>> Am 05.08.2012 22:27, schrieb Adam NEVERT:
> Hello,
>
> I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
> authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
>
>> How can you tell we
* Reindl Harald :
> Am 05.08.2012 22:27, schrieb Adam NEVERT:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
> >>> authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
> >>>
> How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not
> authen
Hello,
I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
I can tell it is a user because it is in my alias_maps
take a deep breath!
you can tell
Adam,
* Adam NEVERT :
> >>I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
> >>authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
> >>
> >>>How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
> >>I can tell it is a user because it is in my alias_maps
> >t
Am 05.08.2012 22:27, schrieb Adam NEVERT:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
>>> authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
>>>
How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
>>> I can tell it is a user
Hello,
I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
I can tell it is a user because it is in my alias_maps
take a deep breath!
you can tell NO
Am 05.08.2012 21:03, schrieb Adam NEVERT:
>
>> On 05/08/12 19:51, Adam NEVERT wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
>>> authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
>>>
>> How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not au
On 05/08/12 19:51, Adam NEVERT wrote:
Hello,
I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
I can tell it is a user because it is in my alias_m
On 05/08/12 19:51, Adam NEVERT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
> authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
>
How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
Hello,
I need to have a unical user who can send emails without authentication
and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
On 8/4/2012 10:08 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> postscreen_client_connection_count_limit = 10
>
> I'm not sure why you did this. Some MTAs, notably qmail, are likely
> to assault you with many simultaneous connections. This non-default
> setting might cause difficulty at times in receiving legitimate
20 matches
Mail list logo