On 25/07/2012 23:00, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/25/2012 8:02 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
I am trying to gets stats so that I can tweak:
smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
smtpd_client_message_rate_limit
smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit
Or you could use postfwd. But in practice I don't see wh
just missed to add berkdb in use flag to get it to work, this leads to
my question:
will it be possible at all to drop berkdb now ?
2.9.3 is the first that have berkdb optional in gentoo
changed to opendkim aswell, where i hope my signer works
--
Benny Pedersen
On 7/25/2012 8:02 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> I am receiving massive amounts of incoming mail (freakin status updates)
> from facebookmail.com and was hoping to check the connection rate via
> anvil in the logs.
> However, there are no suck entries in the log.
> I am trying to gets stats so that I
Eric Smith:
> to=<|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post fres...@fruitcom.com>, \
Sorry, with Postfix, "|command" is never a valid email address.
That was a security hole before many people on this list were born.
Destinations such as "|command" are allowed ONLY in alias_maps
(NOT: virtual_alias_m
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 08:55:52 PM Eric Smith wrote:
> Thanks Robert (Scott)
>
> I have upgraded, checked and followed the Ubuntu docs.
> transport in master.cf corrected (I had a typo that gave the
> error with the user expansion), now it is like this;
>
> [root@pepper ~] $ grep -A1 mailman
Thanks Robert (Scott)
I have upgraded, checked and followed the Ubuntu docs.
transport in master.cf corrected (I had a typo that gave the
error with the user expansion), now it is like this;
[root@pepper ~] $ grep -A1 mailman /etc/postfix/master.cf
mailman unix - n n -
On Jul 24, 2012, at 18:24, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> This works for us;
>
> $ ls -ald /etc/postfix
> drwxr-x--- 5 root postcfg 4096 Jul 24 18:05 /etc/postfix
>
> The postfix user is a member of the 'postcfg' group. Any admin accounts
> that need access to the contents can also be added if needs
Hi,
Short version: Is there a way to apply recipient canonical mappings (or
any other mappings that rewrite the envelope recipient) for specific
SMTP client machines in a null client/central mailhub environment?
Background: In our development infrastructure we have a few mail hubs
which accept an
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:29:44AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > the main config AFAIK needs 644
>
> Correct, the main.cf and master.cf files should be world-readable.
>
> > sensible files can be done with proxymap and so restricted
> >
> > http://www.postfix.org/proxymap
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:29:44AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> the main config AFAIK needs 644
Correct, the main.cf and master.cf files should be world-readable.
> sensible files can be done with proxymap and so restricted
>
> http://www.postfix.org/proxymap.8.html
Proxymap does not matter h
Tom Kinghorn:
> Good afternoon
>
> Apologies for the question but it is baffling me.
> does Anvil record all connections?
As documented anvil counts the events within a time window. Once
the end of the time window is reached, the counters are reset to
zero and the next time window begins.
> I am
Good afternoon
Apologies for the question but it is baffling me.
does Anvil record all connections?
I am receiving massive amounts of incoming mail (freakin status updates)
from facebookmail.com and was hoping to check the connection rate via
anvil in the logs.
However, there are no suck ent
Please take your debate about password selection policies elsewhere.
It has nothing to do with postfix.
On 2012-07-25 Mark Blackman wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2012, at 10:09, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> Please re-read what I wrote, particularly the second half of it. Is
>> "Joseph Zebediah Average 4/1/1999" really a strong password?
>
> It is a strong password, unless you believe attackers would regard
> that
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 02:36:40 PM Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 25.07.2012 14:30, schrieb Eric Smith:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have the following versions mailman 1:2.1.14-3 on postfix 2.9.1-5 and
> > Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
> >
> > My installation is for lists on virtual domains
> > NOT foobar.fruitcom.c
Am 25.07.2012 14:30, schrieb Eric Smith:
> Hi
>
> I have the following versions mailman 1:2.1.14-3 on postfix 2.9.1-5 and
> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
>
> My installation is for lists on virtual domains
> NOT foobar.fruitcom.com
> but complete virtual domains, in this example
> foobar.com
>
> When I con
Hi
I have the following versions mailman 1:2.1.14-3 on postfix 2.9.1-5 and Ubuntu
12.04 LTS
My installation is for lists on virtual domains
NOT foobar.fruitcom.com
but complete virtual domains, in this example
foobar.com
When I configure with the following instructions such as this one:
http:/
Look at rsyslog -- it's a syslog daemon (that you might use and not know, it's
the native one in a lot of distros). It can log directly to MySQL..
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/set-up-rsyslog-to-store-syslog-messages-in-mysql/1174
---
Aaron Bennett
Manager of Systems Administrati
On 7/25/2012 4:09 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> Indeed there isn't much disagreement on what forms a strong password (in
> principle). I do fail to see how this could be enforced on a technical
> level, though.
Use a plugin such as:
http://www.html-form-guide.com/web-form-widget/web-form-password-
On 7/24/2012 6:24 PM, mouss wrote:
> anvil is not an anti-spam solution. it's measure against "clients gone
> crazy".
Precisely. And that's how I advised the OP to us it: Plug the artery
until surgery can be performed. Surgery in this case being disabling
the account and setting a strong passw
Am 25.07.2012 11:06, schrieb Naval saini:
>
> I have configured postfix mail server and i use it for sending mails from my
> clients. when they send mails some mails are delivered, some are
> bounced,deferred,expire. and they report me that mails are not delevering.
> Now i want if we can store to
On 25 Jul 2012, at 10:09, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> Mark,
>
>
> Please re-read what I wrote, particularly the second half of it. Is
> "Joseph Zebediah Average 4/1/1999" really a strong password?
It is a strong password, unless you believe attackers would regard that
format as a promising format
Mark,
On 2012-07-25 Mark Blackman wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2012, at 08:20, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> On 2012-07-25 mouss wrote:
>>> oh come on! the "users" excuse is wa too old. if your software accepts
>>> weak passwords, then the problem is with the software, not the user.
>>
>> I'd have to disagree
I have configured postfix mail server and i use it for sending mails from my
clients. when they send mails some mails are delivered, some are
bounced,deferred,expire. and they report me that mails are not delevering.
Now i want if we can store to,from address and status of mails in database
and ca
Am 25.07.2012 10:33, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 25.07.2012 10:17, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>
>>
>> Am 25.07.2012 04:02, schrieb Marky Yehezkiel [SNC]:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Recently I got request if our mail server can notify the receiver if there
>>> is email spam and if the receiver feel
>>> it ge
Am 25.07.2012 10:17, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 25.07.2012 04:02, schrieb Marky Yehezkiel [SNC]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently I got request if our mail server can notify the receiver if there
>> is email spam and if the receiver feel
>> it genuine email then they can release it by them self. Does
Am 24.07.2012 18:58, schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
> Thanks, I actually tried this but ran into a problem:
>
> Jul 24 01:45:50 localhost postfix/sendmail[26795]: fatal: open
> /etc/postfix/main.cf: Permission denied
>
> That alone is easy to fix (allow $authorized_submit_users read access to
>
Am 25.07.2012 04:02, schrieb Marky Yehezkiel [SNC]:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I got request if our mail server can notify the receiver if there is
> email spam and if the receiver feel
> it genuine email then they can release it by them self. Does postfix can do
> this? Or does anyone has implement t
On 25 Jul 2012, at 08:20, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2012-07-25 mouss wrote:
>> Le 24/07/2012 08:37, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
>>> You'd think humans beings would be smart enough to follow directions
>>> and use strong passwords, AV software, etc, and not fall for phishing
>>> scams. Your adversar
On 2012-07-25 mouss wrote:
> Le 24/07/2012 08:37, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
>> You'd think humans beings would be smart enough to follow directions
>> and use strong passwords, AV software, etc, and not fall for phishing
>> scams. Your adversary in this war isn't the spammers, it's not the
>> technol
30 matches
Mail list logo
