Ori Bani:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:11:57AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >
> >> I recently saw Exim reject/not deliver mail based on this old, expired
> >> draft:
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
> >>
> >>
Hi list,
Sorry again for being out-of-subject. Since I posted to this ML in last
resort (as GLD seems to be mainly related to Postfix), I thought that a
few readers using it but not having the clues to answer my question
(since I got no answer) could still be interested.
Other users, feel free to
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:11:57AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>> I recently saw Exim reject/not deliver mail based on this old, expired draft:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
>>
>> What ever became of that one?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 21/6/12 0:59, Noel Jones wrote:
> Anybody know a reliable online resource for English/Spanish
> technical terms?
The Spanglish mailing list (spangl...@uma.es)[1] is dedicated to
English/Spanish technical translations and it has many knowledgea
[Off Topic]
A teacher/colleague of mine is hoping to travel to South America to
teach some technical courses (VMware and Cisco). His Spanish is
good (he says; I'm not qualified to judge), but he is having trouble
finding the proper Spanish technical terms.
Anybody know a reliable online resource
On 6/20/2012 4:27 PM, Matt Van Mater wrote:
> However, it strikes me as strange that developers went through the
> trouble of automatically configuring "smtpd_use_tls = yes" for
> client/servers that support STARTTLS, when that setting has little
Be assured that postfix does *not* set "smtpd_use_
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:27:24PM -0400, Matt Van Mater wrote:
> However, it strikes me as strange that developers went through the
> trouble of automatically configuring "smtpd_use_tls = yes" for
> client/servers that support STARTTLS, when that setting has little
> value if the smtp_tls_securit
Matt Van Mater:
> However, it strikes me as strange that developers went through the
> trouble of automatically configuring "smtpd_use_tls = yes" for
> client/servers that support STARTTLS, when that setting has little
This is false.
As documented the Postfix SMTP server does not by default
accep
>> However, my main point of confusion was surrounding the use of
>> "smtp_tls_security_level", where I believe the documentation says the
>> default for this setting is 'none'.
>
> As documented in TLS_README and other places, the default is "no
> TLS" for both server and client, and I do not expe
Matt Van Mater:
> However, my main point of confusion was surrounding the use of
> "smtp_tls_security_level", where I believe the documentation says the
> default for this setting is 'none'.
As documented in TLS_README and other places, the default is "no
TLS" for both server and client, and I do
> Correction:
>
> "smtpd_use_tls = yes" turns on TLS when the remote SMTP client
> sends the STARTTLS command.
>
> This the recommended configuration for MX hosts that also
> must be able to receive plaintext mail.
That makes sense since I did not explicitly set the smtpd_use_tls
setting, somethin
Wietse Venema:
> Matt Van Mater:
> > My interpretation is that setting smtpd_use_tls = yes only "allows" you to
> > use TLS, but you need to have smtp_tls_security_level set to something
> > OTHER than none to actually work over an encrypted channel. Perhaps I am
>
> Nope, that is false.
>
> As
Matt Van Mater:
> My interpretation is that setting smtpd_use_tls = yes only "allows" you to
> use TLS, but you need to have smtp_tls_security_level set to something
> OTHER than none to actually work over an encrypted channel. Perhaps I am
Nope, that is false.
As documented, "smtpd_use_tls = ye
Hi all,
Don't you love it when you can struggle with something for 2 days, 'give
up' and post to a mailing list only to look like a fool and solve the
problem a few minutes later? Yeah, that's me.
But for posterity/mailing list's sake:
In addition to the info below, all I had to do was add
`smtp
Den 2012-06-20 16:00, Nicolás skrev:
Surprisingly on the server side (mail.domain.es) there's no log
activity.
check syslog is not eathing it
Any ideas of why is this happening?
see recipient logs, or senders logs, depending of the problem with
syslogs
El 20/06/2012 17:12, Dennis Guhl escribió:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:00:44PM +0100, Nicolás wrote:
Hi there!
[..]
The whole postconf -n command on the client, nagios.domain.es:
config_directory = /etc/postfix
relayhost = [domain.es]
Is it intentional that you turned MX lookups off? See
htt
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:00:44PM +0100, Nicolás wrote:
> Hi there!
[..]
> The whole postconf -n command on the client, nagios.domain.es:
>
> config_directory = /etc/postfix
> relayhost = [domain.es]
Is it intentional that you turned MX lookups off? See
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#r
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:11:57AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I recently saw Exim reject/not deliver mail based on this old, expired draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
>
> What ever became of that one?
It never became a standard, but it is "practiced" informally. I
Wael MANAI:
> Yes I know that. Look this is the mailer-daemon sent by postfix (bold
> line at the end of the message). In the notification only "552
> Requested ..." must appear, why 250-PIPELINING too?
By the multiline rule of RFC 5321:
1) The EHLO reply is:
250 whatever
2) The MAIL FROM r
Adrian Gibanel :
> So I understand:
>
> transport:
> ---
>
> hotmail.com hotmailratelimit:
> yahoo.com yahooratelimit:
> my.domain.com localratelimit:
You don't need an entry for my.domain.com.
With my.domain.com in mydestination, it will be delivered with the
"local" transport. T
On 20/06/2012 16:13, François Yuul wrote:
Hello,
I use Postfix as a relay SMTP to send bulk mail (newsletter).
And I would like to regulate them according to the domain name of the
recipient.
For example, if I have to send 100 emails to domainA and 100 mails to
domainB
I would like Postfix regula
Hi,
If you can manage to rewrite your problem on: "Number of messages sent per
hour" or better even "The messages sent to the same domain have to be send each
X seconds" you might be interested in my: How to handle local mail when
throttling? thread:
http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=13395
Hello,
I use Postfix as a relay SMTP to send bulk mail (newsletter).
And I would like to regulate them according to the domain name of the recipient.
For example, if I have to send 100 emails to domainA and 100 mails to domainB
I would like Postfix regulate those mails by sending in a first
So I understand:
transport:
---
hotmail.com hotmailratelimit:
yahoo.com yahooratelimit:
my.domain.com localratelimit:
main.cf:
--
# ...
hotmailratelimit_destination_rate_delay = 15s
yahooratelimit_destination_rate_delay = 15s
localratelimit_destination_rate_delay = 0s
Yes I know that. Look this is the mailer-daemon sent by postfix (bold
line at the end of the message). In the notification only "552
Requested ..." must appear, why 250-PIPELINING too?
"Received: by relay.com (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 9E06D8E87A; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:33:58 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Wael MANAI wrote:
I read the thread but I don't understand if it's possible to have Bcc
parameter in the header of the message.
You do understand that the B in BCC means BLIND, right? It wouldn't be
very blind if the BCC information were included in the message data.
Th
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 05:11:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I recently saw Exim reject/not deliver mail based on this old, expired draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
>
> What ever became of that one?
I think it died from lack of momentum and people were worried about
M
Am 20.06.2012 16:10, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Wael MANAI:
>> What do you mean "security software"? It's postfix which adds
>> 250-PIPELINING...
>
> You are mistaken.
>
> The "security" software sends
>
> 250 whatever
> 250-PIPELINING
> 552 whatever
>
> The 250-PIPELINING is NOT P
Wael MANAI:
> What do you mean "security software"? It's postfix which adds
> 250-PIPELINING...
You are mistaken.
The "security" software sends
250 whatever
250-PIPELINING
552 whatever
The 250-PIPELINING is NOT PART OF THE EHLO RESPONSE.
In RFC 5321, section "4.2.1. Reply Code Sev
Am 20.06.2012 15:57, schrieb Wael MANAI:
> I read the thread but I don't understand if it's possible to have Bcc
> parameter in the header of the message.
no because BCC is never in the headers
this would break BCC per definition what BCC is
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
What do you mean "security software"? It's postfix which adds
250-PIPELINING...
Here is postfconf -n output:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alternate_config_directories = /etc/postfix_out
always_add_missing_headers = no
append_at_myorigin = no
append_dot_mydomain = no
best_mx_transport = d
Hi there!
I'm having some trouble configuring one postfix as a client to send
mails through my mail server. So I have 2 servers, one of them running
as the postfix server with virtual users using MySQL (everything ok
there), let's call it mail.domain.es and another one, let's call it
nagios.d
I read the thread but I don't understand if it's possible to have Bcc
parameter in the header of the message.
Here is an extract of the message sent (wireshark tcp stream):
220 relay.com ESMTP Postfix (2.8.7)
EHLO origin.gprs
250-relay.com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 1024
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-ENH
Adrian Gibanel :
> > > 5) Create transport_regexp file like:
> > >
> > > /@hotmail.com$/ hotmailratelimit:
> > > /@yahoo.com$/ yahooratelimit:
> > > !/@my.domain.com$/ slowratelimit:
>
> > Don't use regular expressions for this. Hash-based transport maps
> > already match the domain portion of the
Wael MANAI:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my problem. I try to send one message which is refused by remote
> mailer (at MAIL FROM Level) with error:
>
> 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation
>
> wireshark tcp stream:
>
> 220 81.52.180.21 ESMTP
> EHLO relay.com
> 250 81.52.180.21[
Am 20.06.2012 15:28, schrieb Wael MANAI:
> where 250-PIPELINING concerns EHLO command.
> Why for an error on MAIL FROM, postfix adds EHLO reply?
nobody knows because you do not submit logs nor output
of postconf -n so nobody is able to guess what is
happening on a foreign machine
signature.as
- Mensaje original -
> De: "Wietse Venema"
> Para: "Postfix users"
> Enviados: Miércoles, 20 de Junio 2012 15:15:24
> Asunto: Re: How to handle local mail when throttling?
> Adrian Gibanel :
> > 5) Create transport_regexp file like:
> >
> > /@hotmail.com$/ hotmailratelimit:
> > /@yahoo
Hi,
Here is my problem. I try to send one message which is refused by remote
mailer (at MAIL FROM Level) with error:
552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation
wireshark tcp stream:
220 81.52.180.21 ESMTP
EHLO relay.com
250 81.52.180.21[relay.com] Please to meet you
250-P
Wael MANAI:
> Hi,
>
> I use Postfix in MMS sending/receiving and some MMS can contain Bcc
> parameter. I have configured Postfix to send all the messages to an
> external program (using pipe mechanism) which treat the MMS. The problem
> is when the MMS sent has one or more Bcc, Postfix delete them
Adrian Gibanel :
> 5) Create transport_regexp file like:
>
> /@hotmail.com$/ hotmailratelimit:
> /@yahoo.com$/ yahooratelimit:
> !/@my.domain.com$/ slowratelimit:
Don't use regular expressions for this. Hash-based transport maps
already match the domain portion of the email address.
http://w
Hi,
I use Postfix in MMS sending/receiving and some MMS can contain Bcc
parameter. I have configured Postfix to send all the messages to an
external program (using pipe mechanism) which treat the MMS. The problem
is when the MMS sent has one or more Bcc, Postfix delete them (pipe
output data do no
Hi,
Just to thank everybody, now I received all the mailer-daemon and I can
control the messages sent.
Le mardi 12 juin 2012 à 12:38 -0500, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 6/12/2012 11:47 AM, Wael MANAI wrote:
> > with internal_mail_filter_classes and header_checks I can redirect
> > the message to my
Ok. I think I've managed to do it with this IDEA 1.
Basically what I have done is:
1) Remove: default_destination_rate_delay = 15s from main.cf
2) Add: slowratelimit_destination_rate_relay = 15s to main.cf
3) Replace: transport_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/transport_regexp in main.cf
4) Remove
I am configuring policyd for my mail server .i have configured policyd server
as follows
my /etc/policyd/cluebringer.conf file...
# Server configuration
#
[server]
# Protocols to load
protocols=< AccessControl: enabled
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE: => CheckHelo: enabled
[2012/0
I recently saw Exim reject/not deliver mail based on this old, expired draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
What ever became of that one?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenb
IDEA 1
-
- Remove the
default_destination_rate_delay = 15s
line.
- Instead of adding:
my.domain.com relayratelimit:
to the /etc/postfix/transport file adding:
REGEXP slowratelimit:
where REGEXP is a regular expression that says: "Everything except whatever
ends with @my.dom
* kibirango moses :
> Please find attached the Postfix configuration :
> root@xxx-xx:/# postconf -n
> alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
> alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
> command_directory = /usr/sbin
> config_directory = /etc/postfix
> content_filter = amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024
please do not top-post after get a reply
at the bottom - i am too lazy to fix the
thread now
> content_filter = amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024
you specify a content-filter on 127.0.0.1
> delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed
> out
i bet amavis hangs, postfi
Please find attached the Postfix configuration :
root@xxx-xx:/# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/p
Am 20.06.2012 09:42, schrieb kibirango moses:
> Hullo Users,
> I am using postfix Version 2.8.4 and i am getting the following error when
> sending out mail
>
> delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed
> out while sending end of data --
> message may be sen
Hullo Users,
I am using postfix Version 2.8.4 and i am getting the following error when
sending out mail
delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]
timed out while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once
Any body with a solution to the error .
Thanks
51 matches
Mail list logo
