That won't work for me. SNI support is the only solution for my scenario
sinceI can't use just one SSL certificate. I haven't used Google Apps to know
what you are talking about.
And I've got a feeling that the "250 response" part of your reply is just wrong
- which 250 response? Certificate
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:26:27AM CEST, Alfonso Reyes said:
> But it handles the mail boxes and deliver to them, thats why I was confused.
> As
> far as I know dovecot only read the information con them.
>
> But it's ok I will contact the dovecot mailing list, sorry for the email.
It depend
On 07/05/12 14:21, Fiona Hines wrote:
> How do I get TLS SNI support in Postfix? I can't find any documentation
> on the subject except a few discussions that are several years old.
> I've got TLS working with one domain but I want to expand it to an
> unknown number of domains and I don't care i
How do I get TLS SNI support in Postfix? I can't find any documentation on the
subject except a few discussions that are several years old. I've got TLS
working with one domain but I want to expand it to an unknown number of domains
and I don't care if the mail client lacks support for SNI.
This is now updated.
Wietse
Other measures to off-load zombies
The postscreen(8) daemon, introduced with Postfix 2.8, provides
additional protection against mail server overload. One postscreen(8)
process handles all connections from "new" SMTP clients, and allows
only well-behaved clien
Le 06/05/2012 13:58, Marc SCHAEFER a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have two scenarii where I would like to know how an e-mail address
> delivers. One of those scenarii is:
>
> I extract e-mail address from various databases for the various
> services of our system (ranging from the USENET news server to
>
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 6 May 2012 16:22:48 -0500
> Von: Chad M Stewart
> An: Steve
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: a header check rule to do <= or >=
>
> On May 3, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Below the untested code but I thin
But it handles the mail boxes and deliver to them, thats why I was
confused. As far as I know dovecot only read the information con them.
But it's ok I will contact the dovecot mailing list, sorry for the email.
Ing. Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez
On May 6, 2012 5:19 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrot
it can not be a postfix problem because
postfix is only a MTA and has nothing to
do with IMAP or POP3 in any form
Am 06.05.2012 23:34, schrieb Alfonso Reyes:
> thanks and Im sorry But Im not sure if it's a dovecot issue or postfix
> issue.
>
> Thats why I sent that email.
>
> Regards.
>
> I
thanks and Im sorry But Im not sure if it's a dovecot issue or postfix
issue.
Thats why I sent that email.
Regards.
Ing. Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez
On May 6, 2012 4:32 PM, "Wietse Venema" wrote:
> Alfonso Reyes:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > I'm trying yo set up postfix with dovecot imap, e
Alfonso Reyes:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I'm trying yo set up postfix with dovecot imap, everything works fine.
Questions about Dovecot configuration are better asked on the
Dovecot mailing list.
Wietse
On May 3, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Steve wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Below the untested code but I think it should work:
>>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>> if /^X\-DSPAM\-Confidence\:\s+/
>>> /^X\-DSPAM\-Confidence\:\s+(0\.[7-9]\d+)$/ DISCARD DSPAM confidence
>> ${1} greater than 0.700
>>> endif
>>> =-
* DTNX Postmaster :
> On May 4, 2012, at 13:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067
> >
> > The evidence section lists "inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255", yet
> > spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)!
> >
> > 93.218.0.0/15 includes large part
On Sun, 6 May 2012 03:39:19 -0400
Sahil Tandon articulated:
>I could not find references to this issue in the archives, and I know
>others manage much higher-volume sites, so I suspect it just indicates
>a severely borked system (FreeBSD 8.3) on my side.
Ever since updating to FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE,
Sahil Tandon:
> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 19:49:18 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Sahil Tandon:
> > > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: CONNECT from
> > > [88.23.204.109]:40294 to [69.147.83.52]:25
> > > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[45237]: addr 88.23.204.109 listed by
> > >
Sahil Tandon:
> May 5 10:00:26 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: warning: psc_dnsbl_request:
> connect to private/dnsblog service: Connection refused
> May 5 10:00:26 mx1 last message repeated 8 times
When does FreeBSD report ECONNREFUSED on an open socket? I thought
it would do that only when t
Hi,
I have two scenarii where I would like to know how an e-mail address
delivers. One of those scenarii is:
I extract e-mail address from various databases for the various
services of our system (ranging from the USENET news server to
fax to e-mail gateway) then create a (Mailman) mailing-list w
On May 6, 2012, at 09:39, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Is there anything I should/could do to prevent these type of
> occurrences? My understanding is that postscreen(8) temporarily
> struggles to contact dnsblog(8) and in the meantime,
> postscreen_greet_wait elapses before DNSBL lookup results are ava
Is there anything I should/could do to prevent these type of
occurrences? My understanding is that postscreen(8) temporarily
struggles to contact dnsblog(8) and in the meantime,
postscreen_greet_wait elapses before DNSBL lookup results are available
for this client.
May 5 10:00:26 mx1 postfix/p
On 5/6/2012 1:16 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 19:49:18 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> If this discrepancy is reproducible let me know. Otherwise I
>> will not lose sleep over this.
>
> Fair enough; I will not report back unless I am able to reproduce it.
Hi Sahil,
Have you c
20 matches
Mail list logo
