RE: Autoresponse for Postfix problem

2012-04-14 Thread Vishal Agarwal
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of J Gao Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 12:48 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Autoresponse for Postfix problem On 12-04-13 11:35 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: On 13-04-12 20:24, J Gao wrote: We

Re: Invoking Maildrop and Amavis-New

2012-04-14 Thread Schiz0
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 4/14/2012 12:16 PM, Schiz0 wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> I currently have a working setup with Postfix 2.9.1 with av and spam >> filtering with ClamAV and spamassasin, respectively. They are >> intergrated via amavis-new using a post-queue cont

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-14 Thread Wietse Venema
b...@bitrate.net: > - i'm drawn to ADDRESS_CLASS_README because of the context of the > proposed note, but is there another place in the documentation > where it might be better served that i'm not considering? Text about table lookups for a particular address class belongs in the text that descri

Re: Weird behavior

2012-04-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/14/2012 12:39 PM, Raven wrote: > On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 12:17 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: >> On 4/14/2012 2:49 AM, Raven wrote: >>> postconf -n: >> ... >>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, >>> permit_sasl_authenticated, >> >> reject_unauth_destination should go here unless

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-14 Thread btb
On Apr 14, 2012, at 13.19, Wietse Venema wrote: > This proposes to add text under VIRTUAL ALIAS domains, that is > "important" for people who are looking for documentation about > LOCAL/VIRTUAL MAILBOX/RELAY domains. They will never find it. > > Wietse maybe as a note for address classes in

Re: Weird behavior

2012-04-14 Thread Raven
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 12:17 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > On 4/14/2012 2:49 AM, Raven wrote: > > > > > What I don't get is why was the message accepted for relay. > > "virtual_mailbox_domains" only lists "domain2.com", definitely not > > "mail.domain2.com". Also, "localu...@domain2.com" is valid but

Re: Invoking Maildrop and Amavis-New

2012-04-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/14/2012 12:16 PM, Schiz0 wrote: > Hello list, > > I currently have a working setup with Postfix 2.9.1 with av and spam > filtering with ClamAV and spamassasin, respectively. They are > intergrated via amavis-new using a post-queue content filter. > > I would like to add maildrop into the mix

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-14 Thread Wietse Venema
b...@bitrate.net: > On Apr 11, 2012, at 07.06, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > No. virtual_alias_maps is ALWAYS consulted, without any "unless" > > conditions. > > > > Wietser > > urg, yes, thank you for the patient reminder. i think my approach may have > been backwards with respect to my goal

Re: Weird behavior

2012-04-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/14/2012 2:49 AM, Raven wrote: > > What I don't get is why was the message accepted for relay. > "virtual_mailbox_domains" only lists "domain2.com", definitely not > "mail.domain2.com". Also, "localu...@domain2.com" is valid but > "localu...@mail.domain2.com

Invoking Maildrop and Amavis-New

2012-04-14 Thread Schiz0
Hello list, I currently have a working setup with Postfix 2.9.1 with av and spam filtering with ClamAV and spamassasin, respectively. They are intergrated via amavis-new using a post-queue content filter. I would like to add maildrop into the mix. I have maildrop installed, and I would like to kn

Re: virtual_alias_domains/maps and address classes

2012-04-14 Thread btb
On Apr 11, 2012, at 07.06, Wietse Venema wrote: > No. virtual_alias_maps is ALWAYS consulted, without any "unless" > conditions. > > Wietser urg, yes, thank you for the patient reminder. i think my approach may have been backwards with respect to my goal. this patch hopefully better ref

Re: Autoresponse for Postfix problem

2012-04-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.04.2012 22:35, schrieb Tom Hendrikx: > Note that Reindls point is true: anyone with a valid sasl account would > be able to activate an autoresponder for any other user. If a web gui is > the right solution depends on your use case, but issues will arise > without more restrictions. not o

Weird behavior

2012-04-14 Thread Raven
Hi all. I have a postfix instance which is top-priority MX for domain2.com (domain2.com. 86400 IN MX 0 srv.domain.com.) There also is an A record "mail.domain2.com" pointing at the postfix server. Today this happened: Apr 14 06:37:20 srv postfix/smtpd[11880]: connect from mail-ey0-f179.google.co