Re: relocation of virtual_transport settings to master.cf service

2012-03-18 Thread mouss
Le 14/03/2012 03:53, b...@bitrate.net a écrit : > On Mar 13, 2012, at 17.01, mouss wrote: > >> Le 13/03/2012 19:07, b...@bitrate.net a écrit : >>> i've been experimenting with delivery for the virtual domain class to >>> dovecot via lmtp - e.g. >>> postconf virtual_transport >>> virtual_tran

Re: Building Postfix RHEL RPMs with custom LDAP packages

2012-03-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Sahil Tandon: > > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > > var_flock_tries=40 > > ... > > I guess that the "var_flock_tries" parameter (which I had added > > according to: > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/277428) > > might not be availabl

Re: Building Postfix RHEL RPMs with custom LDAP packages

2012-03-18 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 16:46:24 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > ... > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/master.cf: unused > ... > "fallback_relay parameter has been removed" is no more available in v2.9 ? % grep -A 2 fallback_relay RELEASE_NOTES-2.3 [Incompat 20051208] The fallback_relay

Re: check_sender_access - allowed actions

2012-03-18 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:32:33PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-03-17 10:20 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > >On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:58:16AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > >>smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > >> > >> # these two maps only have REJECTs, no OKs allowed > >>check_recipient_acc

Re: Redundant cleanup mail to one user with different extensions

2012-03-18 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 11:26:57 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote: > ... > Sorry, I thought it's simple to reproduce. I've install postfix to > clean debian-6 system, add alias gul-test to "gul+1, gul+2", set > procmail as local delivery agent, send test email to the alias and got > only one copy in mai

Re: SMTP commands Auth

2012-03-18 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 06:51:03PM +, Rachid Abdelkhalak wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012, Reindl Harald wrote: > >Am 18.03.2012 19:27, schrieb Rachid Abdelkhalak: > If it's not possible, Is there any additional filters can i > apply authenticate users trying to use SMTP Commands to send

Re: SMTP commands Auth

2012-03-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.03.2012 19:51, schrieb Rachid Abdelkhalak: >> you are NOT prompted if the RCPT is in your own domains >> this is because you are not try to relay >> that way mail delivery works from other MTA's > > The RCPT is not in my domain. > > For example, if i connect to my server > > telnet myser

Re: SMTP commands Auth

2012-03-18 Thread Rachid Abdelkhalak
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.03.2012 19:27, schrieb Rachid Abdelkhalak: If it's not possible, Is there any additional filters can i apply authenticate users trying to use SMTP Commands to send emails from the server using Telnet port 25? there is simply no differnce bet

Re: SMTP commands Auth

2012-03-18 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Rachid Abdelkhalak : > Can i force users to SMTP-Auth when they use SMTP commands (Telnet > 25 port of my server) to send emails from my domain? Yes, you can. The SASL_README mentions filters around smtpd_sender_login_maps. Also, if you can, you may simply split incoming and ougoing traffic by

Re: SMTP commands Auth

2012-03-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.03.2012 19:27, schrieb Rachid Abdelkhalak: >>> If it's not possible, Is there any additional filters can i apply >>> authenticate users trying to use SMTP Commands to >>> send emails from the server using Telnet port 25? >> >> there is simply no differnce between telnet and any other MUA >

Re: SMTP commands Auth

2012-03-18 Thread Rachid Abdelkhalak
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.03.2012 19:14, schrieb Rachid Abdelkhalak: Hello List, Can i force users to SMTP-Auth when they use SMTP commands (Telnet 25 port of my server) to send emails from my domain? If it's not possible, Is there any additional filters can i appl

Re: SMTP commands Auth

2012-03-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.03.2012 19:14, schrieb Rachid Abdelkhalak: > > Hello List, > > Can i force users to SMTP-Auth when they use SMTP commands (Telnet 25 port of > my server) to send emails from my > domain? > > If it's not possible, Is there any additional filters can i apply > authenticate users trying t

SMTP commands Auth

2012-03-18 Thread Rachid Abdelkhalak
Hello List, Can i force users to SMTP-Auth when they use SMTP commands (Telnet 25 port of my server) to send emails from my domain? If it's not possible, Is there any additional filters can i apply authenticate users trying to use SMTP Commands to send emails from the server using Telnet po

Re: check_sender_access - allowed actions

2012-03-18 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-03-17 10:20 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:58:16AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = # these two maps only have REJECTs, no OKs allowed check_recipient_access ${hash}/moved-employees, check_recipient_access ${hash}/x-employees, Fi

Re: Putting all outgoing mail on hold?

2012-03-18 Thread Jesper Dybdal
I wrote: >Is there a simple way to put all outgoing mail (i.e., everything that >would normally be processed by the default "smtp" instance) into the >HOLD queue? Thanks for the responses. Considering the disadvantages of using the HOLD state that Noel describes, I think I'll use Wietse's sugges

Re: Redundant cleanup mail to one user with different extensions

2012-03-18 Thread Pavel Gulchouck
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:01:49AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes: > On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 16:00:26 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes: > >> On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote: >> > >>> I use recipient_delimiter feat