RE: Putting all outgoing mail on hold?

2012-03-17 Thread Vishal Agarwal
Hi, I have read somewhere that if you put "/^Received:/ HOLD" in header checks; then all the message will be in queue and will be waiting for delivery. In such case after getting all the message hold, you can use postsuper -H [-H queue_id (un-hold)] to deliver selected messages. Thanks/regard

Re: Putting all outgoing mail on hold?

2012-03-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Jesper Dybdal: > Is there a simple way to put all outgoing mail (i.e., everything that > would normally be processed by the default "smtp" instance) into the > HOLD queue? # postconf -e 'default_transport = retry:waiting for remote server upgrade' Wietse

Re: Putting all outgoing mail on hold?

2012-03-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/17/2012 9:48 AM, Jesper Dybdal wrote: > Is there a simple way to put all outgoing mail (i.e., everything that > would normally be processed by the default "smtp" instance) into the > HOLD queue? > > The reason I would like to do that is that the IP address on which I run > my little server is

Re: Redundant cleanup mail to one user with different extensions

2012-03-17 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 16:00:26 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes: > > On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote: > > >> I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local > >> delivery. Messages for me+sms

Putting all outgoing mail on hold?

2012-03-17 Thread Jesper Dybdal
Is there a simple way to put all outgoing mail (i.e., everything that would normally be processed by the default "smtp" instance) into the HOLD queue? The reason I would like to do that is that the IP address on which I run my little server is about to change, and I would like outgoing mail to be

Re: Building Postfix RHEL RPMs with custom LDAP packages

2012-03-17 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 16/3/2012 11:21 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote: I'll test this hypothesis anyway, but it's good to know others' experience on such matters. So, I've upgraded on a test server with a vanilla postfix (standard settings, as installed on CentOS 5, i.e. ) which had been upgraded in the past to 2.8.2

Re: check_sender_access - allowed actions

2012-03-17 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:58:16AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > After modifying my config to work the way I want it to after the > switch from webroot to postini, I have a "funny" Postini story to tell. Recently I made inquiry about features of the service, and in the web form I carefully and

Re: Redundant cleanup mail to one user with different extensions

2012-03-17 Thread Pavel Gulchouck
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes: > On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote: >> I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local delivery. >> Messages for me+sms goes to sms, for me+xmpp - to jabber etc. >> >> But if I want to receiv

Re: Redundant cleanup mail to one user with different extensions

2012-03-17 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote: > I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local delivery. > Messages for me+sms goes to sms, for me+xmpp - to jabber etc. > > But if I want to receive a message both to xmpp and sms, I have a problem, > because cleanu

check_sender_access - allowed actions

2012-03-17 Thread Charles Marcus
Hello all, After modifying my config to work the way I want it to after the switch from webroot to postini, I'd like a sanity check on my modified restrictions to make sure I didn't make some glaring mistake that is going to bite me (full postconf -n at the end of this message)... Here are m

Re: problem with locks

2012-03-17 Thread Wietse Venema
PSTM: > /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling > Mar 16 21:33:52 vs2706 postfix/smtpd[20259]: fatal: select lock: > Cannot allocate memory > Mar 16 21:34:34 vs2706 postfix/tlsmgr[29292]: fatal: cannot lock PRNG > exchange file /var/lib/postfix/prng_exch: Cannot allocate mem

Redundant cleanup mail to one user with different extensions

2012-03-17 Thread Pavel Gulchouck
Hi. I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local delivery. Messages for me+sms goes to sms, for me+xmpp - to jabber etc. But if I want to receive a message both to xmpp and sms, I have a problem, because cleanup decides that me+xmpp and me+sms is the same user, and leaves onl

problem with locks

2012-03-17 Thread PSTM
Hello, I have a problem when postfix is running: Mar 16 21:32:52 vs2706 postfix/master[8710]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 16241 exit status 1 Mar 16 21:32:52 vs2706 postfix/master[8710]: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling Mar 16 21:33:52