Hi,
I have read somewhere that if you put "/^Received:/ HOLD" in header
checks; then all the message will be in queue and will be waiting for
delivery. In such case after getting all the message hold, you can use
postsuper -H [-H queue_id (un-hold)] to deliver selected messages.
Thanks/regard
Jesper Dybdal:
> Is there a simple way to put all outgoing mail (i.e., everything that
> would normally be processed by the default "smtp" instance) into the
> HOLD queue?
# postconf -e 'default_transport = retry:waiting for remote server upgrade'
Wietse
On 3/17/2012 9:48 AM, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
> Is there a simple way to put all outgoing mail (i.e., everything that
> would normally be processed by the default "smtp" instance) into the
> HOLD queue?
>
> The reason I would like to do that is that the IP address on which I run
> my little server is
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 16:00:26 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes:
> > On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
>
> >> I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local
> >> delivery. Messages for me+sms
Is there a simple way to put all outgoing mail (i.e., everything that
would normally be processed by the default "smtp" instance) into the
HOLD queue?
The reason I would like to do that is that the IP address on which I run
my little server is about to change, and I would like outgoing mail to
be
On 16/3/2012 11:21 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I'll test this hypothesis anyway, but it's good to know others'
experience on such matters.
So, I've upgraded on a test server with a vanilla postfix (standard
settings, as installed on CentOS 5, i.e. ) which had been upgraded in
the past to 2.8.2
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:58:16AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> After modifying my config to work the way I want it to after the
> switch from webroot to postini,
I have a "funny" Postini story to tell. Recently I made inquiry
about features of the service, and in the web form I carefully and
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes:
> On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
>> I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local delivery.
>> Messages for me+sms goes to sms, for me+xmpp - to jabber etc.
>>
>> But if I want to receiv
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
> I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local delivery.
> Messages for me+sms goes to sms, for me+xmpp - to jabber etc.
>
> But if I want to receive a message both to xmpp and sms, I have a problem,
> because cleanu
Hello all,
After modifying my config to work the way I want it to after the switch
from webroot to postini, I'd like a sanity check on my modified
restrictions to make sure I didn't make some glaring mistake that is
going to bite me (full postconf -n at the end of this message)...
Here are m
PSTM:
> /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
> Mar 16 21:33:52 vs2706 postfix/smtpd[20259]: fatal: select lock:
> Cannot allocate memory
> Mar 16 21:34:34 vs2706 postfix/tlsmgr[29292]: fatal: cannot lock PRNG
> exchange file /var/lib/postfix/prng_exch: Cannot allocate mem
Hi.
I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local delivery.
Messages for me+sms goes to sms, for me+xmpp - to jabber etc.
But if I want to receive a message both to xmpp and sms, I have a problem,
because cleanup decides that me+xmpp and me+sms is the same user, and
leaves onl
Hello, I have a problem when postfix is running:
Mar 16 21:32:52 vs2706 postfix/master[8710]: warning: process
/usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 16241 exit status 1
Mar 16 21:32:52 vs2706 postfix/master[8710]: warning:
/usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
Mar 16 21:33:52
13 matches
Mail list logo