Re: using header_checks for custom transport

2012-03-16 Thread mouss
Le 16/03/2012 15:06, Pim Zandbergen a écrit : > On 16-3-2012 14:18, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >>> /^X-Mailing-List:/REDIRECT some@address >> DO NOT do this. If a particular recipient wants his list traffic left >> a local mailbox, and the rest forwarded, that's up the to user's >> LDA, say procmai

Re: problem with rejecting helo

2012-03-16 Thread mouss
Le 16/03/2012 18:22, Jack a écrit : > Hello All, > > > > I'm having a problem where I am rejecting messages from one of our servers, > but I'm not clear as to why. > > > > We are using: > > check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_access > > > > We have in helo_access the following: >

dynamicmaps patch?

2012-03-16 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Just wondering if someone can post an URL to download dynamicmaps patch for 2.9+ :LD

Re: problem with rejecting helo

2012-03-16 Thread Fernando Maior
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Jack wrote: > Hello All, > > ** ** > > I’m having a problem where I am rejecting messages from one of our > servers, but I’m not clear as to why. > > ** ** > > We are using: > > check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_access > > ** ** > > We have

problem with rejecting helo

2012-03-16 Thread Jack
Hello All, I'm having a problem where I am rejecting messages from one of our servers, but I'm not clear as to why. We are using: check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_access We have in helo_access the following: ourdomain.comREJECT Helo Check helo_access ourdomain.net

Re: postscreen and ldap

2012-03-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Stanislas LEVEAU: > Hi > > I've an ldap error with postscreen when the recipient is not in the ldap > (a bad recipient) : > > Error : > > Mar 16 15:13:09 relais1 postfix/smtpd[23031]: warning: > dict_ldap_connect: Unable to bind to server ldap://ldap.domain.fr:389 > with dn uid=binduser,o=dom

postscreen and ldap

2012-03-16 Thread Stanislas LEVEAU
Hi I've an ldap error with postscreen when the recipient is not in the ldap (a bad recipient) : Error : Mar 16 15:13:09 relais1 postfix/smtpd[23031]: warning: dict_ldap_connect: Unable to bind to server ldap://ldap.domain.fr:389 with dn uid=binduser,o=domain,c=fr: -1 (Can't contact LDAP ser

Re: using header_checks for custom transport

2012-03-16 Thread Pim Zandbergen
On 16-3-2012 14:18, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: /^X-Mailing-List:/REDIRECT some@address DO NOT do this. If a particular recipient wants his list traffic left a local mailbox, and the rest forwarded, that's up the to user's LDA, say procmail(1), or similar. This must not be done at the message lev

Re: using header_checks for custom transport

2012-03-16 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:37:21PM +0100, Pim Zandbergen wrote: > I am routing all mail for a domain to another SMTP server using the > transport map rule > > adomain.comrelay:other.server Good. > But I would like to exclude mailing lists, and have them processed locally, > using header_che

Re: New default settings for "submission" service?

2012-03-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Ed W: > Therefore I'm suggesting that the out of the box config matches the > *RFC*. Then if the mail owner wants to lock it down to some non RFC > suggested spec they can read the instructions. Wietse: > SHOULD does not forbid mandatory TLS; only a twisted mind will read > this as "support for p

Re: New default settings for "submission" service?

2012-03-16 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-03-16 6:41 AM, Ed W wrote: You are arguing in circles. The original point of this thread was to suggest the defaults better match sensible out of the box defaults. The specs say "may" offer TLS (not required). No, they say *should*, which, in my book, is the best argument for the de

Re: New default settings for "submission" service?

2012-03-16 Thread Ed W
On 16/03/2012 11:57, Wietse Venema wrote: Ed W: Therefore I'm suggesting that the out of the box config matches the *RFC*. Then if the mail owner wants to lock it down to some non RFC suggested spec they can read the instructions. SHOULD does not forbid mandatory TLS; only a twisted mind will

Re: New default settings for "submission" service?

2012-03-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Ed W: > Therefore I'm suggesting that the out of the box config matches the > *RFC*. Then if the mail owner wants to lock it down to some non RFC > suggested spec they can read the instructions. SHOULD does not forbid mandatory TLS; only a twisted mind will read this as "support for plaintext i

using header_checks for custom transport

2012-03-16 Thread Pim Zandbergen
I am routing all mail for a domain to another SMTP server using the transport map rule adomain.comrelay:other.server But I would like to exclude mailing lists, and have them processed locally, using header_checks entries like this: /^X-Mailing-List:/FILTER local: Here, "local" is the

Re: New default settings for "submission" service?

2012-03-16 Thread Ed W
On 16/03/2012 07:06, Robert Schetterer wrote: I forget the exact issue now, but note that I'm not saying that it *can't* work. What I'm saying is that I have a bunch of "normal" non technical users. "Johnny" runs through the wizard on his favourite device and then costs me money in tech support

Re: Building Postfix RHEL RPMs with custom LDAP packages

2012-03-16 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 15/3/2012 11:30 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote: One set of config files will produce the same result ONLY if you use it with the same Postfix version. ... Postfix actually updates config files so that they keep producing the same result as with your older Postfix version, to the extent that this

Re: New default settings for "submission" service?

2012-03-16 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 16.03.2012 00:02, schrieb Ed W: > On 15/03/2012 13:01, Victoriano Giralt wrote: >> >> DTNX/NGMX Postmaster wrote: >> >>> I don't know about Android, but we have not seen any issues with the >>> iPhone/iPad. Works fine with TLS 'encrypt' in our setups, as suggested >>> above. >> In my experience