Re: message-id discarded on send?

Awesome! That was it. I assumed my PERL library was doing the <> for me. I'm hearing the when you assume speech coming on. Thank you!! On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 3/8/2012 10:48 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > If I submit a message with the following message-id to the po

Re: message-id discarded on send?

On 3/8/2012 10:48 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > If I submit a message with the following message-id to the postfix > sendmail interface using */usr/sbin/sendmail -r...@here.com > -t -oi -oem* > Message-Id: *58faf4a4-8e6f-4b60-af87-173efa7d3...@here.com >

message-id discarded on send?

If I submit a message with the following message-id to the postfix sendmail interface using */usr/sbin/sendmail -r...@here.com -t -oi -oem* Message-Id: *58faf4a4-8e6f-4b60-af87-173efa7d3...@here.com* The Postfix sendmail interface receives the message with the specified message-id: Mar 9 03:49:05

Re: complex policy -- how best to implement in Postfix?

Ben Rosengart: > If, upstream, I separate the recipients into different transports, > will this cause the upstream Postfix to "split the envelope" and send > the mail in >1 transaction, even though both transports are implemented > with smtp(8) and the nexthop is the same? Each transport in a (tra

Re: complex policy -- how best to implement in Postfix?

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:06:25PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:26:09PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote: > > > > I want to rewrite *sender addresses* (preferably headers only) when > > these conditions are _all_ met: > > > > 1. Client is not in an ACL, > > 2. Sender m

Re: complex policy -- how best to implement in Postfix?

Ben Rosengart: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:26:09PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote: > > > > Apologies. I'm thinking parts of this over and if I reanimate the > > thread, I will be sure to provide full context. > > Let me try this again. > > I want to rewrite *sender addresses* (preferably headers o

Re: postscreen scalability

Dan Lists: > How much traffic can postscreen handle? Each mail server in our > cluster handles 800,000 to 1,000,000 messages per day. We typically This is mainly limited by the whitelist database latency: the time needed to decide that a client is OK, and to hand off the connection to a real SM

Re: complex policy -- how best to implement in Postfix?

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:26:09PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote: > > Apologies. I'm thinking parts of this over and if I reanimate the > thread, I will be sure to provide full context. Let me try this again. I want to rewrite *sender addresses* (preferably headers only) when these conditions are

Re: How to delete a key via postconf

On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 2:05 PM -0500 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 1:11 PM -0500 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > Hi Wietse, > > I noted in my initial email why this is not desirable solution.

postscreen scalability

How much traffic can postscreen handle? Each mail server in our cluster handles 800,000 to 1,000,000 messages per day. We typically have 60-120 smptd processes, with peaks as high as 320. Adding a greeting delay will result in a lot of open connections. Can postscreen handle this volume even w

Re: Strange behavior of Postfix?

Leslie Le?n Sinclair: > The two sessions, below... > > 1) Show one maillog example of a "good" session. > > Mar 8 14:58:40 apolo postfix/pickup[26492]: C7A5356B4: uid=33 > from= Please DO NOT send debug logging unless asked to do so. This mail is not received via SMTP. > > 2) Show one maillog

Re: Strange behavior of Postfix?

Am 08.03.2012 20:58, schrieb Leslie León Sinclair: >> 2) Show one maillog example of a "bad" session. > > Mar 8 14:52:59 apolo postfix/smtpd[24202]: Read 52 chars: MAIL > FROM: > Mar 8 14:52:59 apolo postfix/smtpd[24202]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > unknown[10.8.xxx.yyy]: 550 5.1.1 > : Reci

Re: Strange behavior of Postfix?

The two sessions, below... 1) Show one maillog example of a "good" session. Mar 8 14:58:40 apolo postfix/pickup[26492]: C7A5356B4: uid=33 from= Mar 8 14:58:40 apolo postfix/qmgr[2706]: C7A5356B4: from=, size=553, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 8 14:58:42 apolo postfix/smtpd[24204]: < localhost

Re: Strange behavior of Postfix?

On 3/8/2012 12:43 PM, Leslie León Sinclair wrote: > A childhood friend of mine have this problem: > > He can send mails to his mailing list server only with RoundCube, > but with another Client[Squirrelmail, Thunderbird, ClawsMail or > Micro$oft Outlook doesn´t], and I don´t know what´s happening.

Re: Strange behavior of Postfix?

Leslie Le?n Sinclair: > A childhood friend of mine have this problem: > > He can send mails to his mailing list server only with RoundCube, but > with another Client[Squirrelmail, Thunderbird, ClawsMail or Micro$oft > Outlook doesn?t], and I don?t know what?s happening. I post below his On the

Strange behavior of Postfix?

A childhood friend of mine have this problem: He can send mails to his mailing list server only with RoundCube, but with another Client[Squirrelmail, Thunderbird, ClawsMail or Micro$oft Outlook doesn´t], and I don´t know what´s happening. I post below his main.cf. Mailman if configured and wor

Re: Question with Postfix and SPF

Marcelo Vieira: > Hello, > > I have a question related with Postfix and SPF. > > I have a server configured to check SPF MTA. Two domains uses that MTA. > > When I receive an e-mail from outside (gmail / hotmail etc ...) the > verification of > SPF is ok. When sending an e-mail from a domain th

Re: Question with Postfix and SPF

On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:44:55 PM Marcelo Vieira wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question related with Postfix and SPF. > > I have a server configured to check SPF MTA. Two domains uses that MTA. > > When I receive an e-mail from outside (gmail / hotmail etc ...) the > verification of > SPF i

Re: Filters : How to change subject based on body?

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 04:49:24PM +0100, Denis BUCHER wrote: > I need to be able to change subject based on message body. > I would be very glad if someone had some advice on how to do > that with postfix ? You cannot. And from reading the rest, I think you should not. > More precisely, what I w

Re: Question with Postfix and SPF

Am 08.03.2012 16:44, schrieb Marcelo Vieira: > I have a question related with Postfix and SPF. > I have a server configured to check SPF MTA. Two domains uses that MTA. > > When I receive an e-mail from outside (gmail / hotmail etc ...) the > verification of > SPF is ok. When sending an e-mail fr

Filters : How to change subject based on body?

Dear all, I need to be able to change subject based on message body. I would be very glad if someone had some advice on how to do that with postfix ? More precisely, what I want to do is : 1. Only emails for postmas...@mydomain.com should be concerned (headers filter) 2. Then based on body

Question with Postfix and SPF

Hello, I have a question related with Postfix and SPF. I have a server configured to check SPF MTA. Two domains uses that MTA. When I receive an e-mail from outside (gmail / hotmail etc ...) the verification of SPF is ok. When sending an e-mail from a domain that exists in the MTA to another,

Re: How to delete a key via postconf

s. There is no postconf(1) > command to perform the reverse operation. Changed to -X for safety reaons. The action may result in loss of information and therefore should require a two-finger action. Updated feature patch (on source code mirrors): postfix-release/experimental/feature-p

Re: Keeping a copy of all mail, and then removing headers from outbound

Lars Preben S?rsdahl: > What I'm trying to achieve is for Postfix to deliver a copy to a > local IMAP account, and then remove our internal/private headers > before passing the mail on to the relay host. The idea is for some > custom software to read the copy from the IMAP account, using the > inte

Re: Keeping a copy of all mail, and then removing headers from outbound

> > What I'm trying to achieve is for Postfix to deliver a copy to a local > IMAP > > account, and then remove our internal/private headers before passing the > > mail on to the relay host. The idea is for some custom software to read > the > > copy from the IMAP account, using the interal/private