On 2/23/2012 1:50 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
I have a postfix-2.8.7 system with fedora15 and amavisd-new-2.6.6.
Lately I have been experiencing significant delays before receiving
the initial postfix 220 greeting from all remote hosts. I've verified
>>>
>>> What is the output from:
>>>
>> > Here are my compilation command list:
>> > ---
>> > installDir=/usr/local/postfix-2.10
>> > make CCARGS='-DNO_DB' tidy
>> > make makefiles CCARGS="-DNO_DB -I/usr/local/ldap/include -DHAS_LDA
>
> > Here are my compilation command list:
> >
> ---
> > installDir=/usr/local/postfix-2.10
> > make CCARGS='-DNO_DB' tidy
> > make makefiles CCARGS="-DNO_DB -I/usr/local/ldap/include -DHAS_LDAP
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 21:33:30 -0500, Gamet A. wrote:
> Here are my compilation command list:
> ---
> installDir=/usr/local/postfix-2.10
> make CCARGS='-DNO_DB' tidy
> make makefiles CCARGS="-DN
I removed the DEBUG= to continue with the compilation and the compilation
stopped at the following in both 2.9 and 2.10 versions:
gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -DNO_DB -I/usr/local/ldap/include
-DHAS_LDAP -DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=/usr/local/postfix-2.10/etc
-DDEF_COMMAND_DIR=/usr/local/postfix-2.10/sbi
Here are my compilation command list:
---
installDir=/usr/local/postfix-2.10
make CCARGS='-DNO_DB' tidy
make makefiles CCARGS="-DNO_DB -I/usr/local/ldap/include -DHAS_LDAP
-DDEF_CONFIG_DIR='$inst
Gamet A.:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting errors when trying to use "-DNO_DB" option (both from 2.9.1
> and 2.10.x)
>
> # make makefiles CCARGS="-DNO_DB"
> make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles
> (echo "# Do not edit -- this file documents how Postfix was built for your
> machine."; /bin/sh makedefs
Hello,
I am getting errors when trying to use "-DNO_DB" option (both from 2.9.1
and 2.10.x)
# make makefiles CCARGS="-DNO_DB"
make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles
(echo "# Do not edit -- this file documents how Postfix was built for your
machine."; /bin/sh makedefs) >makedefs.tmp
No include
On 2/24/2012 4:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > That is the part I didn't understand. What exactly triggers the other
>> > rejections I see with NOQUEUE? I thought each message would be rejected
> What other rejections? You have shown nothing.
Yes, for I have failed to post all that I have referen
On 2012-02-24 4:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
That is explained in my two sentences above. I am not a pervert
who has a better explanation but refuses to share it.
Maybe not, but you definitely have one of the driest senses of humor
I've ever seen... thanks for making me spill my tea all over m
Le 24/02/2012 17:28, Kaleb Hosie a écrit :
> I'm trying to enable postfix to use an SSL certificate for sending email but
> when I enable SMTP on my outlook client,
> I get this message:
> "Send test e-mail message: Your server does not support the connection
> encryption type you have specified.
Robert Fitzpatrick:
> But unlike other domains that we transport for, I do not see the NOQUEUE
> reject log entries for this user address, I do see the deliveries for
> >>>
> >>> If you don't save the probe result, then the result is thrown away.
> >>> Telepathic computing is not yet comm
Robert Fitzpatrick:
> On 2/24/2012 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > There is also is some logic to prevent a negative probe result from
> > replacing a positive result. This is needed because Postfix will
> > try to refresh a probe result before it expires.
>
> Just read this after my last post.
On 2/24/2012 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> There is also is some logic to prevent a negative probe result from
> replacing a positive result. This is needed because Postfix will
> try to refresh a probe result before it expires.
Just read this after my last post. Perhaps this explains, the addre
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:28:01PM +, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> I'm trying to enable postfix to use an SSL certificate for sending
> email but when I enable SMTP on my outlook client, I get this
> message:
You are misled by the confusing overloading of the various terms
relating to transport layer
On 2/24/2012 3:40 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert Fitzpatrick:
>> On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert Fitzpatrick:
(maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
>>> ...
Feb 24 08:33:
Wietse Venema:
> Robert Fitzpatrick:
> > On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Robert Fitzpatrick:
> > >> (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
> > >> where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
> > > ...
> > >> Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/sm
Robert Fitzpatrick:
> On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Robert Fitzpatrick:
> >> (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
> >> where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
> > ...
> >> Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/smtp[6812]: 8024C2E2BD:
> >> to
Robert Fitzpatrick:
> (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
> where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
...
> Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/smtp[6812]: 8024C2E2BD:
> to=, relay=x.x.x.x[x.x.x.x]:25, delay=10,
> delays=0.01/0.01/5.1/5, dsn=5.1.1, status=u
Having a problem understanding where my issue is with AV for this one
(maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
mx1# grep 8024C2E2BD /var/log/maillog
Feb 24 08:33:45 mx1 postfix/cleanup[7752]: 8024C2E2BD:
message
I'm trying to enable postfix to use an SSL certificate for sending email but
when I enable SMTP on my outlook client, I get this message:
"Send test e-mail message: Your server does not support the connection
encryption type you have specified. Try changing the encryption method. Contact
your ma
On 2/24/2012 8:04 AM, Bányász Botond wrote:
> What means this 1-element cache? it caches the last lookup?
>
Right. The cache is not specific to mysql, but is a feature of the
trivial-rewrite transport lookup.
This is only likely to be noticed when you use mysql-based
transport_maps and a high
What means this 1-element cache? it caches the last lookup?
Banyasz Botond
Phone:0740138717
Ymes:banyasz_b
From: Noel Jones
To: Bányász Botond ; "postfix-users@postfix.org"
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: postfix mysql lookup table has
On 2/24/2012 2:04 AM, Bányász Botond wrote:
> Hy,
>
> I want to setup a system who warmes the sending ip`s, so i made a
> mysql transport map where per domain i can add how much % to relay
> from main ip pool to the warmup ip pool. The problem is that if
> manually I change in the database for ex
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:21:03PM +, Luca Pacor wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> First of all I tell you that this is my first postfix installation
> so please be patient...
>
> I have following scenario:
>
> fetchmail --> postfix --> amavis-new --> postfix --> exchange 2010.
> Everything -except
Hy,
I want to setup a system who warmes the sending ip`s, so i made a mysql
transport map where per domain i can add how much % to relay from main
ip pool to the warmup ip pool. The problem is that if manually I change in the
database for example yahoo.com domain
from 0 percent to 100 percent
26 matches
Mail list logo
