* Reindl Harald :
> > Look into greylisting it. You'll find that greylisting could very
> > well deal with most of the bots that things like zen.spamhaus.org
> > would normally deal with. And strictly speaking, you're not filtering
> > it -- just making a policy decision to not accept the transac
On 2/18/2012 8:49 AM, Chad M Stewart wrote:
>
> I am using postfix as a relay MTA, i.e. the MX points at it, it applies
> various filters and then relays the mail to final systems.
>
> Is it possible to configure postfix such that say some header checks are
> applied to certain domains that rel
I am using postfix as a relay MTA, i.e. the MX points at it, it applies various
filters and then relays the mail to final systems.
Is it possible to configure postfix such that say some header checks are
applied to certain domains that relay mail and not apply those checks to other
domains?
Am 18.02.2012 10:55, schrieb Jean Bruenn:
> A better approach _might_ be to reject all mails to postmaster@ with a
> message pointing to a contact-form. That way you could also make sure
> that users with problems will provide "useful" information (as you can
> configure the fields of the contact
> what i do not understand is that i get three days the same idiot spam
> mail about administration part-time job for 3000$ per month to always
> the same post-master address in exactly 3 different variants
>
> guess it is the best to setup a sieve-filter trahsing this diretly
> on the server by e
Zitat von john :
We need to ensure that emails sent by some of our users are
encrypted (medical records, reports, etc) before they are sent.
We only accept out going mail from our local users by submission (port 587).
I realize that this is really the job of the MUA, but I would like
to ch
