On Jan 6, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/6/2012 3:05 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
>> [root@myhost postfix]$ dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. any
> ...
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.2
>> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org.
Thx for all answers. Setting sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail -t -i -C
/etc/postfix-third in httpd.conf did the trick. Now mails have correct
ip/domain information.
2012/1/6 Wietse Venema
> damian freelance:
> > Hi, i have a problem with my 2 postfix instances. 2 separate IP's and
> > coressp
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:46:40 +0200, Tolga wrote:
if not all is well, but you know that x.x.0.0/16 is alot of
client/mta ips ?
I'll take that out. I don't use it in anyway and I don't know where
that came from.
some users / scripts with root access changed it, or just redhat ? :)
will be usefu
--On Friday, January 06, 2012 10:19 PM +0200 Eray Aslan
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:23:02AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, January 06, 2012 11:05 AM +0200 Eray Aslan
wrote:
> There are reports of broken PLAIN and LOGIN mechs with cyrus-sasl
> 2.1.25. But I can't reprod
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:23:02AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, January 06, 2012 11:05 AM +0200 Eray Aslan
> wrote:
> > There are reports of broken PLAIN and LOGIN mechs with cyrus-sasl
> > 2.1.25. But I can't reproduce it.
>
> That is what I'm seeing. :/ Where else did you
damian freelance:
> Hi, i have a problem with my 2 postfix instances. 2 separate IP's and
> coressponding domain names are setup on networking, they are working fine.
> I want second mail message (below) to have
> `Received: from firstInstanceDomain.com (firstInstanceDomain.com.
> [second.domain.
On 1/6/2012 12:01 PM, damian freelance wrote:
> Hi, i have a problem with my 2 postfix instances. 2 separate IP's
> and coressponding domain names are setup on networking, they are
> working fine. I want second mail message (below) to have
> `Received: from firstInstanceDomain.com (firstInstanceD
Hi, i have a problem with my 2 postfix instances. 2 separate IP's and
coressponding domain names are setup on networking, they are working fine.
I want second mail message (below) to have
`Received: from firstInstanceDomain.com (firstInstanceDomain.com.
[second.domain.ip])`
instead of
`Receiv
--On Friday, January 06, 2012 9:23 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
There are reports of broken PLAIN and LOGIN mechs with cyrus-sasl
2.1.25. But I can't reproduce it.
That is what I'm seeing. :/ Where else did you see these reports?
Ok, found that one on the cyrus-sasl list. Doesn't
--On Friday, January 06, 2012 11:05 AM +0200 Eray Aslan
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:46:08PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Thus my question as to whether or
not anyone has gotten 2.1.25 to work with Postfix at all. If someone
can confirm they have SMTP auth working with a Cyrus-SAS
On 1/6/2012 3:05 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> [root@myhost postfix]$ dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. any
...
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.2
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.10
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spam
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> disable_mime_output_conversion can be used to disable the 8bit->7bit
> conversion while sending mails to mailers not annnouncing "8BITMIME"
> after EHLO.
>
> But is the a way of seeing how often this conversion is actually being
> used?
The Postfix SMTP client does not provide
On Jan 5, 2012, at 2:33 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/4/2012 10:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> You could consolidate all of your restrictions into
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Unless you need complex whitelisting,
>> it's usually easier that way, to only maintain one set of
>> restriction
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:46:08PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Thus my question as to whether or
> not anyone has gotten 2.1.25 to work with Postfix at all. If someone can
> confirm they have SMTP auth working with a Cyrus-SASL 2.1.25 linked
> Postfix, then it gives me other avenues to
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
> ...
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>
> BTW "client" != "recipient", in case that is what you meant by
> duplicated settings. They are different settings, but functionally
> similar. Yo
On 01/03/2012 11:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Tolga:
Hi,
I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to me:
Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1
Service unavailable
On 01/06/2012 03:23 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:37:16 +0200, Tolga wrote:
Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client
host [85.95.233.13] blocked using sbl.spamhaus.org;
http:
17 matches
Mail list logo
