Re: free antivirus scanner ?

OK thanks to you guys, I have enough information Le 03/01/2012 16:26, Frank Bonnet a écrit : Hello I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix. Any infos/links/advices welcome Thanks and happy new year.

Re: sender delivery status notification not working

* Yep the mistake i did was that i was grepping for smtp_discard instead of smtpd_discard postconf | grep smtp_disc smtp_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps = smtp_discard_ehlo_keywords = postconf | grep smtpd_disc postscreen_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps = $smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address

FreeBSD port for the experimental release [was Re: post-install, IPv6-only: could not find any active network interfaces (again)]

I do not usually announce FreeBSD port version bumps here, but in this case, I felt it appropriate. Sorry to those for whom this is not relevant. I have updated the development port to Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20120102 and removed the erroneous conf/post-install patch that was discussed earlier in th

Re: Multiple Instances inheriting default instance settings

I didn't see it in the documentation, that's why I asked. I double checked my execution of the postconf command. I ran postconf with the -c option and I also ran postconf with postmulti both returned the same results. Of course, now I can't reproduce what I observed before. I realize now that I

Re: Multiple Instances inheriting default instance settings

On 2012-01-03 23:16, David DeFranco wrote: I read through the "Multi Instance ReadMe" and didn't see an answer for my question so I thought I'd just ask. When I specify a configuration in the default instance of Postfix that setting seems to be inherited by the other instances. I think you

Re: Multiple Instances inheriting default instance settings

David DeFranco: > I read through the "Multi Instance ReadMe" and didn't see an answer for my > question so I thought I'd just ask. > > When I specify a configuration in the default instance of Postfix that > setting seems to be inherited by the other instances. Where does Postfix documentation pr

Re: Aliases on local submissions only

On 2012-01-03 04:33, Philip Prindeville wrote: On 1/2/12 7:08 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 01/02/2012 02:00 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote: I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain. It merely serves to

Multiple Instances inheriting default instance settings

I read through the "Multi Instance ReadMe" and didn't see an answer for my question so I thought I'd just ask. When I specify a configuration in the default instance of Postfix that setting seems to be inherited by the other instances. For example: I set message_size_limit on the default instance

Re: Illegal block?

On 1/3/2012 3:37 PM, Tolga wrote: > Hi, > > I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to > me: > > Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: > reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service > unavailable; Client host [85.95.233.13] blocked u

Re: Illegal block?

Am 03.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Tolga: > Hi, > > I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to me: > > Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT > from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 > Service unavailable; Client host [85.95.233.13] blocke

Re: feature request: %x in sql/ldap tables

/dev/rob0: > %x When the input key is an address of the form > user+extension@domain, %x is replaced by the SQL > quoted recipient_delimiter and extension of the > local part of the address. Otherwise, %x is > empty. If the localpart is empty, the query is > suppressed and r

Re: Illegal block?

* Tolga : > Client host [85.95.233.13] blocked using sbl.spamhaus.org; ... > reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org, ...

Illegal block?

Hi, I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to me: Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [85.95.233.13] blocked using sbl.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org

feature request: %x in sql/ldap tables

%x When the input key is an address of the form user+extension@domain, %x is replaced by the SQL quoted recipient_delimiter and extension of the local part of the address. Otherwise, %x is empty. If the localpart is empty, the query is suppressed and returns no results. and

Re: Aliases on local submissions only

On 1/3/12 12:36 AM, Lorens Kockum wrote: > On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:00:46PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it >> doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain. >> >> It merely serves to check messages for

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

Am 03.01.2012 21:21, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > On 1/3/2012 12:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: >> >>> To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers >>> switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't >>> r

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

On 1/3/2012 12:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > >> To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers >> switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't >> recall the last time I saw a viral email attachment.

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

* Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Charles Marcus : > > On 2012-01-03 1:18 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > >Also blocking "unwanted" attachments and double extensions (with > > >mime_header_checks or amavis) leaves only little stuff for clamav to > > >eat. > > > > Care to share your header_checks for block

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

* Charles Marcus : > On 2012-01-03 1:18 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >Also blocking "unwanted" attachments and double extensions (with > >mime_header_checks or amavis) leaves only little stuff for clamav to > >eat. > > Care to share your header_checks for blocking 'double extensions' (if > you'r

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

Am 03.01.2012 19:42, schrieb Charles Marcus: > On 2012-01-03 1:18 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> Also blocking "unwanted" attachments and double extensions (with >> mime_header_checks or amavis) leaves only little stuff for clamav to >> eat. > > Care to share your header_checks for blocking 'do

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

On 2012-01-03 1:18 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Also blocking "unwanted" attachments and double extensions (with mime_header_checks or amavis) leaves only little stuff for clamav to eat. Care to share your header_checks for blocking 'double extensions' (if you're doing it with header checks)?

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

* /dev/rob0 : > On Tuesday 03 January 2012 09:26:57 Frank Bonnet wrote: > > I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source > > antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix. > > > > Any infos/links/advices welcome > > One link, Google, would have easily found cla

Re: Where's ORIGINAL_RECIPIENT?

On Tuesday 03 January 2012 08:49:30 Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: > I could sure use it! > > TMDA when generating challenge messages sends a 'From:' based on TMDA is challenge/response, which basically means: to fight your own spam, you spam innocent victims. As much as I dislike spam, I would ne

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers > switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't > recall the last time I saw a viral email attachment. our barracuda saw 2929 in the last year compared wi

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

On Tuesday 03 January 2012 11:28:09 Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-01-03 12:09 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > Info/advice: with postscreen(8), sane HELO restrictions, and good > > DNSBLs, clamav is not going to get much use. > > Clamav, with the sane-security sigs, most certainly does block a > lot of

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

On 1/3/2012 11:09 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Tuesday 03 January 2012 09:26:57 Frank Bonnet wrote: >> I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source >> antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix. >> >> Any infos/links/advices welcome > > One link, Google, would h

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

On 2012-01-03 12:09 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: Info/advice: with postscreen(8), sane HELO restrictions, and good DNSBLs, clamav is not going to get much use. Clamav, with the sane-security sigs, most certainly does block a lot of phising scams that would not otherwise be blocked. And most of post

Re: Relay for many local systems, but restrict internet forwarding?

From: Jeroen Geilman adaptr.nl> Subject: Re: Relay for many local systems, but restrict internet forwarding? Date: 2011-12-30 21:39:45 GMT (3 days, 18 hours and 26 minutes ago) >LR> Currently, we have a Postfix V

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

On Tuesday 03 January 2012 09:26:57 Frank Bonnet wrote: > I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source > antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix. > > Any infos/links/advices welcome One link, Google, would have easily found clamav. Info/advice: with post

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

You can also try amavis http://www.amavis.org/ and comine it with clamav. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:26:57PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote: > > > I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source > > antivirus scanner for

Re: free antivirus scanner ?

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:26:57PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote: > I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source > antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix. You probably want this: http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/ -- Mason Loring Bliss ma...@bl

free antivirus scanner ?

Hello I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix. Any infos/links/advices welcome Thanks and happy new year.

Re: Internal+external mailrelay

* Michael Maymann : > Hi Ralf, > > Thanks again :-) !, > > If I keep relayhost there, it will still be possible to send mails to > others than my "whitelisted" transport_maps, yes > or will transport_maps make relayhost irrelevant (not working / > commented out) ? no. -- Ralf Hildebrandt

Where's ORIGINAL_RECIPIENT?

I could sure use it! TMDA when generating challenge messages sends a 'From:' based on the $RECIPIENT variable. Unfortunately, my primary addresses are all aliases, where I'd like those to be canonical, and $RECIPIENT is post-expansion. With the documented ORIGINAL_RECIPIENT to hand, this isn'

Re: Internal+external mailrelay

Hi Ralf, Thanks again :-) !, If I keep relayhost there, it will still be possible to send mails to others than my "whitelisted" transport_maps, or will transport_maps make relayhost irrelevant (not working / commented out) ? I guess my smtp: should also be: relay: as my postfix server is not d

Re: Internal+external mailrelay

* Michael Maymann : > Hi Ralf, > > Thanks - I now have... > --- > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > # transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport > relayhost = [our_isp_mailrelay] > > /etc/postfix/transport: > # smtp: > # relay: > # relay: > # relay: > # relay: > # relay: > --- > When i put this to produc

Re: Internal+external mailrelay

Hi Ralf, Thanks - I now have... --- /etc/postfix/main.cf: # transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport relayhost = [our_isp_mailrelay] /etc/postfix/transport: # smtp: # relay: # relay: # relay: # relay: # relay: --- When i put this to production, my config should be like this, right: --- main.c

Re: Internal+external mailrelay

* Michael Maymann : > Hi List, > > I have a internal mailrelay, that I would like to provide following service: > 1. mail to our own domain is send directly to our externally hosted > (outsourced) mailserver > 2. mail to external domains are relayed through ISP-mail-relay only for > specific domai

Re: Internal+external mailrelay

On Jan 3, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Michael Maymann wrote: > Hi List, > > I have a internal mailrelay, that I would like to provide following service: > 1. mail to our own domain is send directly to our externally hosted > (outsourced) mailserver > 2. mail to external domains are relayed through ISP-ma

Internal+external mailrelay

Hi List, I have a internal mailrelay, that I would like to provide following service: 1. mail to our own domain is send directly to our externally hosted (outsourced) mailserver 2. mail to external domains are relayed through ISP-mail-relay only for specific domains I have the following in my mai

Re: sender delivery status notification not working

pritam raote: > ehlo localhost > 250-AAA-AAD..com > 250-PIPELINING > 250-SIZE 31457280 > 250-VRFY > 250-ETRN > 250-STARTTLS > 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN > 250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN > 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES > 250 8BITMIME There is no DSN announcement, therefore, the mail client will not reque